Poll

Help me pick my next soldering station please...

Hakko FX951 - $245
5 (13.5%)
Pace  ADS200 - $388
8 (21.6%)
JBC CD-1BQF - $449
24 (64.9%)

Total Members Voted: 34

Author Topic: Soldering station - Hakko, JBC, or Pace??  (Read 16764 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline thm_w

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7808
  • Country: ca
  • Non-expert
Re: Soldering station - Hakko, JBC, or Pace??
« Reply #50 on: October 06, 2022, 10:12:50 pm »
I haven't ever tried the 500 kHz options but my Metcal has never had a problem with connections over many 1000 of joints and use by 5 different employees.  I also got it very second hand... if the 500 kHz versions are better I'd he interested to see,  I always assumed they were just the budget end.

They are the budget end yes, but still perform well.
The later units have two ports, so I'm sure they had a few complaints about the time taken to plug and unplug the connector properly.

Profile -> Modify profile -> Look and Layout ->  Don't show users' signatures
 

Offline Electro Fan

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3333
Re: Soldering station - Hakko, JBC, or Pace??
« Reply #51 on: February 25, 2025, 09:49:59 pm »
Old thread, I know.

Any chance the poll results in this thread might change in favor of Hakko if the 951 is replaced with the 971?  At $330 before tips the 971 is about $260 less than JBC CD.

Hakko has less power but maybe enough for all but large soldering jobs.  Hakko has tip changing similar to JBC.  Hakko has separate stand which might or might not be preferred to JBC integrated stand.  Hakko has so-so but maybe ok UI, plus some maybe useful software features.

Pace ADS200 Plus looks good overall but I’m kinda enthusiastic about the quick change slots with JBC and Hakko 971.

Mostly looking to move up from a Hakko 888 to something with modern cartridge style tips.  Thx
 

Offline thm_w

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7808
  • Country: ca
  • Non-expert
Re: Soldering station - Hakko, JBC, or Pace??
« Reply #52 on: February 25, 2025, 10:24:34 pm »
No one has used it here so no one can really comment. But from what we know, started in a thread by yourself: https://www.eevblog.com/forum/reviews/hakko-fx-971-fx-972/ there is likely not a major difference from 951 to 971.

Quick change slot is not really a big deal, with Pace (or JBC and hakko) you can just grab the tip with a silicone pad to remove it. Which is what I usually do.
Profile -> Modify profile -> Look and Layout ->  Don't show users' signatures
 

Offline Shock

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4358
  • Country: au
Re: Soldering station - Hakko, JBC, or Pace??
« Reply #53 on: February 28, 2025, 07:47:47 am »
Fried Chicken ended up ditching his FX971/972 plans for the older Hakko FM206 as it's multichannel. As I mentioned in the Pace thread no tweezer support on these, makes them a one and a half trick pony as far as I'm concerned with only a few small improvements.

If you are looking to get JBC consider a Metcal MX5210 for $300 more. You get an extra channel to add tweezers later and will have the best working distance and performance money can buy. Has also a better handpiece than both JBC and Hakko in my opinion.
Soldering/Rework: Pace ADS200, Pace MBT350
Multimeters: Fluke 189, 87V, 117, 112   >>> WANTED STUFF <<<
Oszilloskopen: Lecroy 9314, Phillips PM3065, Tektronix 2215a, 314
 

Offline jonpaul

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3701
  • Country: fr
  • Analog, magnetics, Power, HV, Audio, Cinema
    • IEEE Spectrum
Re: Soldering station - Hakko, JBC, or Pace??
« Reply #54 on: March 04, 2025, 12:03:29 pm »
Metcal smart heat

My design in 1990s.


The best and from USA not CCP

j
The Internet Dinosaur..
passionate about analog electronics since 1950s
 

Offline 2N3055

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7648
  • Country: hr
Re: Soldering station - Hakko, JBC, or Pace??
« Reply #55 on: March 04, 2025, 01:24:06 pm »
Metcal smart heat

My design in 1990s.


The best and from USA not CCP

j

Hakko is Japanese...
"Just hard work is not enough - it must be applied sensibly."
Dr. Richard W. Hamming
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf