Many of these wood substitute products dramatically lose strength if they are soaked for any length of time, in other words, immersed in water. A good example is houses that fronted on beachfront during Hurricane Sandy. There was a kind of failure where suddenly the walls of the lower part of a house that were made with this stuff would lose lateral strength and the house would fall onto often backwards, into their foundations, inward. Entire blocks in San Francisco and a row of identical Craftsman cottages, small homes, on the coast near Santa Cruz, closer to the Loma Prieta quake, did that.
Its a real problem in areas prone to soil liquefaction.
This failure mode of housing resembles something I had seen a lot in California during the two large earthquakes I have lived through. There it had not gotten wet, it was just the huge strain put on it when the earth became liquid like. Just remember to replace it completely if it ever gets soaked. even if it looks okay. One cant prevent earthquakes, they just happen. I hope that its clear that I am talking about two unrelated phenomena, simply because the aftermath of both look similar.
Just keep it dry.. if it ever gets wet its never as strong after that ..
Also these products are much more prone to getting moldy if they get wet for any length of time than wood. Wood is much more resistant to mold than wood substitute products.
The web site buildingscience.com is a very good resource for info on this phenomenon. I live in an old house that does not use that stuff and thats what I prefer. They outvent formaldehyde if they get wet too. And it irritates the eyes as well as being unhealthy.
Many new buildings make extensive use of these products and smell so much that I cant spend a lot of time in them. It makes me sick. Its some kind of vascular spasm in my brain that reliably, without fail, gives me a nasty migraine headache.