Author Topic: 3458A and ADC drift  (Read 7576 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Kleinstein

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 14249
  • Country: de
Re: 3458A and ADC drift
« Reply #25 on: July 24, 2019, 06:55:42 am »
In industry there is little need for 8 digit resolution. The big point of the 3458 there is more in getting good resolution (5-7 digits) fast. However in this area some modern meters like the Keithley DMM7510 can be nearly as good and an optional scanner is a big plus.
The real need for 8.5 digits is essentially only in metrology, e.g. to check other meters / calibrations and similar. So it's a niche market and it's much about reputation.

At least from the specs the 2 new Fluke 8.5 digit meters seem much lower noise than before. So this may very well be more than just a simple slight upgrade of the old Datron ADC.
 

Offline Dr. Frank

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2384
  • Country: de
Re: 3458A and ADC drift
« Reply #26 on: July 24, 2019, 07:48:59 am »
Well, the upcoming '3458A - Black Edition' will probably contain nearly the same schematics inside as the latest version, but most of its components will be transferred to SMD and RoHS technology only, therefore smaller PCBs, plus replacement of several terminated parts. Hopefully, they did not touch the magic inside the original layout..

Everything might be compatible to the old instruments, as HP /agilent already did that during the last 30 years.

Maybe there will be an improved specification, as KS surely has to go through a new validation / qualification process, which  might be the reason, why the updated instrument is not yet available.

I also assume, there will be no firmware change. It'll have the same GPIB interface only... HP did also not want to touch the rock solid firmware of the HP48 calculators, later on.

KS simply does not have these 'eggheads' anymore, who either left the company (towards Keithley), retired, or already passed away (poor Mr. Swerlein).

Some remainders of the original team just designed the 34465A/470A, but the knowledge about that 3458A magic surely passed away also, and I really doubt that this had been documented well enough.

Although there would be some details to be improved, like this mistreated LTZ1000 reference, the thermal handling, the poor Ohm mode, or some components which have too big a drift.. but why change a near perfect design, especially this unsurpassed A/D converter, for no real advantage, no real perspective for noteworthy improvement, due to probable physical limitations?

Frank
« Last Edit: July 26, 2019, 07:07:54 am by Dr. Frank »
 

Offline iMo

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4798
  • Country: pm
  • It's important to try new things..
Re: 3458A and ADC drift
« Reply #27 on: July 24, 2019, 08:39:33 am »
.. but why change a near perfect design..
Why ElonM and his SpaceX does not use the Sojuz or Proton rockets then?  :)
 
The following users thanked this post: e61_phil

Offline niner_007Topic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 256
  • Country: us
Re: 3458A and ADC drift
« Reply #28 on: July 24, 2019, 08:53:12 am »
Proton and Soyuz rockets are far from perfection
 
The following users thanked this post: iMo

Online Zucca

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 4320
  • Country: it
  • EE meid in Itali
Re: 3458A and ADC drift
« Reply #29 on: July 24, 2019, 09:39:32 am »
Well, the upcoming '3458A - Black Edition'

we should start a separate thread only about the Beast Edition 3458A. Right now we have some informations spreaded in different places.
Can't know what you don't love. St. Augustine
Can't love what you don't know. Zucca
 
The following users thanked this post: niner_007, Grandchuck

Offline Gandalf_Sr

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1729
  • Country: us
Re: 3458A and ADC drift
« Reply #30 on: October 20, 2019, 12:12:35 pm »
.. but why change a near perfect design..
Why ElonM and his SpaceX does not use the Sojuz or Proton rockets then?  :)
Elon Musk has ALL the key stuff designed and built in-house; from fuel tanks to triple-redundant avionics.  For one thing, buying rockets from Russia would seem like a very dodgy proposition for a company that's contracted to deliver secret stuff into space for the US government and anyway, reliance on an external contractor is always a risk that you will struggle to contain.

I truly admire Musk for what he's achieved but I'm not sure I'd like to work for him.
If at first you don't succeed, get a bigger hammer
 
The following users thanked this post: iMo

Offline iMo

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4798
  • Country: pm
  • It's important to try new things..
Re: 3458A and ADC drift
« Reply #31 on: October 21, 2019, 12:43:48 pm »
FYI - my question above was rather a rhetorical one :)
 

Offline niner_007Topic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 256
  • Country: us
Re: 3458A and ADC drift
« Reply #32 on: October 22, 2019, 02:31:58 am »
FYI - my question above was rather a rhetorical one :)
yes we know, the SpaceX is Keysight here :)
 

Online maat

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 144
  • Country: de
Re: 3458A and ADC drift
« Reply #33 on: October 25, 2019, 05:22:38 pm »
Well, save the date, 1st of December:
https://www.meilhaus.de/en/3458a.htm
 
The following users thanked this post: niner_007

Offline iMo

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4798
  • Country: pm
  • It's important to try new things..
Re: 3458A and ADC drift
« Reply #34 on: October 25, 2019, 06:20:30 pm »
Any teardown seen?
 

Offline niner_007Topic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 256
  • Country: us
Re: 3458A and ADC drift
« Reply #35 on: October 25, 2019, 10:27:04 pm »
Well, save the date, 1st of December:
https://www.meilhaus.de/en/3458a.htm
The king is dead, long live the king :-) The beast is back.
 

Offline rogerymw

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 5
  • Country: hk
Re: 3458A and ADC drift
« Reply #36 on: November 22, 2021, 02:17:11 pm »
Hello Everybody,

I just testing an old "HP" Logo 3458A, the CAL? 72 data as attachment.

A is time : Mins
B is Temp? value
C is CAL? 72 value


Is that the drift too high?


 

Offline Kleinstein

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 14249
  • Country: de
Re: 3458A and ADC drift
« Reply #37 on: November 22, 2021, 02:56:24 pm »
I just testing an old "HP" Logo 3458A, the CAL? 72 data as attachment.

A is time : Mins
B is Temp? value
C is CAL? 72 value

Is that the drift too high?

It depends on the unit for the times scale:
For this is time in seconds the measurement is too short. If this is time in hours or days  :-DD , the dirft would be OK. For a time in minuts the drift is too high. It could still be just a settling effect after longer not using the meter - in this case it may still stabilze and need a little more time to tell.
 

Offline rogerymw

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 5
  • Country: hk
Re: 3458A and ADC drift
« Reply #38 on: November 22, 2021, 04:00:41 pm »
off about a month before.

how about yours? for how long it will drift less?

Thanks!
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf