So yeah, tggzzz's comments can be not always the most adequated ones, but at least I have seen him stating he had been made aware he was wrong. That's something I have still not see coming from you. I'm sure you are able to simply state your goals, letting aside any aggresivity, probably originated from any perceived attack to the quality of your product. I for one would greatly appreciate that. Otherwise I'll stick with the people that isn't selling anything. just saying.
Where I'm not reasonably sure of something, I'll either not comment or I'll add caveats. When I realise I've made a mistake, I don't try to revise history, and I do try to apologise. IMHO constructive conversations cannot occur without that.
I'm very tolerant of beginners asking information, provided they
listen to the answers, and
think. Watching someone's capabilities improve is a profound pleasure.
We all make mistakes; that's part of learning. However, as I taught my daughter, "let's make
new mistakes".
I'm less tolerant of people who don't listen[3], or don't learn, or choose not to improve, or do who misrepresent other people's position[1], or who
continue to misrepresent their product[2] (typically to ignorant managers).
I've spent a lifetime being plagued by salesman/companies who make impossible claims for their products. I know others feel the same!
[1] often in the form of chosing to omitting relevant context, or with strawman arguments
[2] e.g. if their product does what they claim, then they've solved the Byzantine General's problem or the split brain problem, or broken the laws of thermodynamics etc.
[3] possibly due to the Dunning-Krueger syndrome