Why do you need a 4-wire zero? The whole point of 4-wire measurements is that only the voltage across the resistor matters so why isn't it sufficient to short the sense inputs when taking a zero measurement? Is it to ensure that any common mode voltage caused by the current force circuit is also applied to the zero measurment?
I have a Datron 1081 and need to make a 4-wire zero source. Does anyone have a picture of one?
The diagrams in the manual don't make much sense to me:
What is the resistor shown? Why would it need to be shorted with a copper link for high resistance ranges but not lower ones? This seems to be the opposite of what I would expect.
That technique of 4W zero obviously mimics the real True Ohm function of the 1281 / 8508A, that is the Offset Compensation of the 3458A.
The purpose is to measure and cancel all effective e.m.f. thermo couples, which are in series inside the instrument, and at the DUT.
For high resistance DUTs, you get more noise, and you might get bias current effects, so that offset compensation might not work well.
That might be the reason, why they propose using an additional short.
Due to these problems, instruments with built in offset compensation, limited that technique to the 20kOhm, or to the 100kohm range.
Anyhow, this short at the DUT for high resistance makes no sense to me, at least it is quite an unclear situation, which e.m.f. is really measured, that of the DUT to the measuring cables, or of the short to the cables.
For low resistance values, neither noise, nor bias current are a problem, so the offset reading can be done using the DUT only.
It's more precise to connect the I+ to the I- source node. If you would simply short I+ and I- , the test current would create a voltage drop across the zeroing cable, introducing a considerable error.
At 100 Ohm for DUT, and 100 mOhm for the test cable, that might be a 0.1% error, for 10k DUT, it's still 10ppm, well observable on 6 1/2 digit DMMs.
Frank