Author Topic: Making Resistance Standards Similar to Leeds and Northrop Standards  (Read 4380 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Gyro

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 10405
  • Country: gb
Re: Making Resistance Standards Similar to Leeds and Northrop Standards
« Reply #25 on: October 13, 2024, 01:01:58 pm »
That's a comma, not a decimal point isn't it? same in the datasheet. Yes the cheaper 5695 is 1ppm to 400Hz, I don't think we have an image of the winding construction of that one.

Hard to think they would specify single digit Hz to 3 decimal places in the datasheet. It just seems more plausible when you're talking 1592Hz.
Best Regards, Chris
 

Offline ArdWar

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 721
  • Country: sc
Re: Making Resistance Standards Similar to Leeds and Northrop Standards
« Reply #26 on: October 13, 2024, 01:12:30 pm »
1592 Hz was (allegedly) from 10000 / 2π, making rad/s values in neat decades.
It is one of the common measuring frequency for artefact metrology alongside the usual 1kHz.
« Last Edit: October 13, 2024, 01:17:45 pm by ArdWar »
 
The following users thanked this post: Gyro, Victorman222

Offline Overspeed

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 596
  • Country: fr
Re: Making Resistance Standards Similar to Leeds and Northrop Standards
« Reply #27 on: October 13, 2024, 01:15:20 pm »
Hello

Ok that a comma and not a point so a typical UK/US system

I never use AC so as far that OK for DC /Pulsed DC that OK for me

a xdev webpage with some ( all ? ) Tinsley models

https://xdevs.com/review/tinsleyres/

85 and 95 are no the same , not the same connectors not the same housing ...
Regards
OS
« Last Edit: October 13, 2024, 02:28:00 pm by Overspeed »
 
The following users thanked this post: ZGoode

Online TimFox

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 9754
  • Country: us
  • Retired, now restoring antique test equipment
Re: Making Resistance Standards Similar to Leeds and Northrop Standards
« Reply #28 on: October 13, 2024, 02:26:11 pm »
1592 Hz was (allegedly) from 10000 / 2π, making rad/s values in neat decades.
It is one of the common measuring frequency for artefact metrology alongside the usual 1kHz.

My Wayne-Kerr B221 admittance bridge operates at 1592 Hz for that reason.
An early 1950s model, the manual for which includes a table of reciprocals for those missing their sliderule.
The bridge shows negative capacitance when measuring an inductance:  it is the capacitance that would resonate that inductance at 1592 Hz.
 
The following users thanked this post: Gyro

Offline Victorman222

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 58
  • Country: ua
Re: Making Resistance Standards Similar to Leeds and Northrop Standards
« Reply #29 on: October 13, 2024, 06:46:11 pm »
What about the kind of wire that the standard is wound with?

For the materials, as i see it, there are two main kinds: the manganin like materials (manganin, constantan) and the nichrome style materials (nichrome, evanohm). The nichrome materials cant be soldered so they don't seem to be very suitable for diy. A shame since evanohm alloys seem to have better TC and temperature range than manganin.

Then choosing between manganin and constantan, it is said that manganin is more susceptible to mechanical stress than constantan, but constantan has a huge thermal EMF with copper of about 40 uV/K. Maybe the TEMF issue could be fixed by having the constantan wires soldered to copper wires at a point that equalizes their temperatures, for example a ceramic chip (like it's done in low TEMF reed relays).

After we chose our wire material, there is the question of what kind of insulation to get. There are three main kinds avilable: bare wire (no insulation), enameled wire, and enameled wire with silk over it. Bare wire seems only suitable for lower resistance values. Enameled wire is good but with smaller diameters like 0.05mm manganin is easy to rip by hand. On the other hand the silk insulation 0.05mm wire is stronger, but there may be a problem with humdity dependence as the silk expands/contracts as described in the NBS circular 470.

Also sometimes there are different anneal? grades, for example with the soviet wires there are: MT MM MС - manganin hard, manganin soft, and manganin stabilized.

It would be very interesting to hear your thoughts. Have you had any experience with the different wire materials and insulation types? Have i misunderstood or missed something important?

« Last Edit: October 13, 2024, 07:18:56 pm by Victorman222 »
 
The following users thanked this post: ZGoode

Offline shabaz

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 745
Re: Making Resistance Standards Similar to Leeds and Northrop Standards
« Reply #30 on: October 13, 2024, 08:00:41 pm »
The nichrome materials cant be soldered so they don't seem to be very suitable for diy.

They can be ferruled though : ) Although whether you'd want to do that or not, I have no idea, since once it is done, you'd have to find some alternate way of trimming since it's not a very reversible thing.

Photo shows ferrules on resistance wire (manganin; I didn't try soldering it directly), but this wasn't a resistance standard, it was just intended to be a dummy 4-ohm/8-ohm load which worked for several hundred watts. I didn't notice any change in resistance after subjecting it to that, but again I wasn't looking out for the same performance as a resistance standard so I can't comment on that. I doubt I checked beyond a few digits but I can't recall. For a standard, I imagine you'd want to protect from even faint oxidization, so possibly it wouldn't be good to have bare wire like this in free air. But I'm speculating, I'm not an expert.
 
The following users thanked this post: Mickle T., ZGoode

Online ZGoodeTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 261
  • Country: us
  • Grad student by day, equipment nerd also by day
Re: Making Resistance Standards Similar to Leeds and Northrop Standards
« Reply #31 on: October 14, 2024, 03:11:22 pm »
I wasn't expecting this many responses to my question, lol
These are all great tidbits of information!  Since I already have some basic nichrome on hand, I'm going to try and practice some of the techniques I see here before I try and replicate them using expensive manganin or evanohm wire.  This might be the excuse I have been looking for to buy one of those small jewelry welding torches
 

Offline bsdphk

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 216
  • Country: dk
Re: Making Resistance Standards Similar to Leeds and Northrop Standards
« Reply #32 on: October 14, 2024, 04:53:46 pm »
I read a personal recollection of the history of resistance standards some years back.  (Possibly one of the founders of ESI?)

One of the first thing he mentions is that people thought they had soldered connections, but what they really had was a blob of solder holding a loose wire in proximity with the terminal.

He mentioned point-welding as the solution, and that's certainly inside the DYI perimeter.
 
The following users thanked this post: Victorman222, ZGoode

Offline Conrad Hoffman

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2136
  • Country: us
    • The Messy Basement
« Last Edit: October 14, 2024, 05:41:08 pm by Conrad Hoffman »
 
The following users thanked this post: ZGoode


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf