The voltage coefficient would be a problem. However the main nonlinearity is usually more a thermal thing and thus more a square law, not a linear part as implied by giving ppm/V. The thermal effect is a principle limitation for such a small case - for improved accuracy some better DMMs use additional heating to compensate. For the thermal effect it also make a difference which voltage is assumed (e.g. 500 V , 1000 V or maybe 1700 V). The RES11 data-sheet shows using a rather high voltage used for the test of the voltage coeffcient.
For the Vishay and Caddock resistors the voltage coeffient given in the data-sheets may be just the the linear part, so excluding the direct thermal effect on the TCR. A linear effect is possible from uneven heating and thermal EMF. So the numbers may not be comparable.
A problem with the high voltage dividers from Ti is there ESD rating - when used for a DMM input, they would need extra ESD protection ! Once damages by ESD the resistor may no longer be able to withstand a high voltage. So the dividers are really made to be used in a more fixed circuit, like a high voltage power supply or checking on the high voltage battery.
After all the divider is a rel. small and cheap part ($2 range), not really made for highest performance. The plastic case also makes it possibly sensitive to humidity effects. For high performance applications the divider ratio is also a bit large - one would like more 1:100 and I would even like 1:50.
It is still nice to see a new source for precision resistor arrays. The lower resistance versions like RES11 are mor something for high precision, though these are missing doubled pins (4 wire connections) at the ends.