Author Topic: Ultra Low Noise Reference 2DW232, 2DW233, 2DW23x  (Read 243773 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline branadic

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2390
  • Country: de
  • Sounds like noise
Re: Ultra Low Noise Reference 2DW232, 2DW233, 2DW23x
« Reply #550 on: September 08, 2018, 10:35:14 am »
Found almost zero t.c. current for that specimen at about 3.29mA which equals a 1.2k resistor on 10V.

-branadic-
Computers exist to solve problems that we wouldn't have without them. AI exists to answer questions, we wouldn't ask without it.
 
The following users thanked this post: BravoV

Offline branadic

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2390
  • Country: de
  • Sounds like noise
Re: Ultra Low Noise Reference 2DW232, 2DW233, 2DW23x
« Reply #551 on: September 08, 2018, 10:54:33 pm »
Quote
OT: what would happen if you feed the diode with a simple 2xPNP 5mA current mirror?

Why should you? My goal is to use a circuit as shown in the first post of this thread, thus the boosted zener ouput voltage (10V on the opamp output) is feeding the zener itself through the current setting resistor. This is why I try to find to optimal current setting resistor while powering everything from a low noise 10V source for now. Next step is to calculate the optimal resistor values of the boost stage to get 10V.

-branadic-
Computers exist to solve problems that we wouldn't have without them. AI exists to answer questions, we wouldn't ask without it.
 
The following users thanked this post: iMo

Offline branadic

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2390
  • Country: de
  • Sounds like noise
Re: Ultra Low Noise Reference 2DW232, 2DW233, 2DW23x
« Reply #552 on: September 11, 2018, 04:28:36 pm »
Measured a little bit more at the italian sample and found, that this device shows excess popcorn noise. Attached are measurements of multiple temperature runs with 1k2 (3.29mA) and 1k247 (~3.16mA) as well as a 10h measurement at 3.29mA.
Need to investigate that a little deeper.

-branadic-
Computers exist to solve problems that we wouldn't have without them. AI exists to answer questions, we wouldn't ask without it.
 

Offline Kleinstein

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 14181
  • Country: de
Re: Ultra Low Noise Reference 2DW232, 2DW233, 2DW23x
« Reply #553 on: September 11, 2018, 04:51:42 pm »
The popcorn noise looks really nasty / high amplitude. Give that these references are not that expensive, I would consider this one defective.
If at all it might be a candidate to investigate / demonstrate popcorn noise.
 

Offline SZA263

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 16
  • Country: it
Re: Ultra Low Noise Reference 2DW232, 2DW233, 2DW23x
« Reply #554 on: September 11, 2018, 05:35:54 pm »
The noise seems too high in amplitude and too regular in frequency. The jumps seems to appear every '500' of your time scale, and seems to not appear during cooling phase.
IMHO is a residual switching noise from the heater. Try to rerun a cycle with heater switched off, disregarding the absolute voltage variation, only to see if the noise is still present.
 

Offline branadic

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2390
  • Country: de
  • Sounds like noise
Re: Ultra Low Noise Reference 2DW232, 2DW233, 2DW23x
« Reply #555 on: September 11, 2018, 05:57:19 pm »
No, you can see the jumps in the temperature cycling measurements during cooling phase, which takes much longer then heating phase and includes a temperature lag between case temperature of the reference diode and the actual die temperature. The heater is simply turned on and heats up to ~38°C. I then wait a while for everything to temperature stabilize and I then turn of the heater. Because of the thermal mass and thermal capacity (aluminium rod) the setup slowly cools down. It's not a controlled cooling, but a cooling due to convection into free air. So there is no switching noise of the heater.

In the 10h measurement (last picture) the temperature was almost stable at about 38°C (heater was turned on for the whole time). So I don't think it is a heater switching, since the heater is not switching but regulating.

EDIT: I currently have a measurement at higher current (~5mA) with heater on (~38°C) running and up to now can't see any jumps, which also seems to prove that it is popcorn noise. The disadvantage is, that a better temperature stability is necessay, as this operating point is on the positive side of the t.c. curve with ~7ppm/K.

-branadic-
« Last Edit: September 11, 2018, 06:54:32 pm by branadic »
Computers exist to solve problems that we wouldn't have without them. AI exists to answer questions, we wouldn't ask without it.
 

Offline branadic

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2390
  • Country: de
  • Sounds like noise
Re: Ultra Low Noise Reference 2DW232, 2DW233, 2DW23x
« Reply #556 on: September 12, 2018, 09:52:28 am »
Measuring long enough at 5.1mA (770R) proves there is (almost?) no popcorn noise visible and disproves the theory that the noise is due to the heater.

-branadic-
Computers exist to solve problems that we wouldn't have without them. AI exists to answer questions, we wouldn't ask without it.
 

Offline SvanGool

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 135
  • Country: nl
Re: Ultra Low Noise Reference 2DW232, 2DW233, 2DW23x
« Reply #557 on: September 12, 2018, 10:42:40 am »
If I look at the discussion here and further: https://www.eevblog.com/forum/metrology/ultra-low-noise-reference-2dw232-2dw233-2dw23x/msg1054431/#msg1054431, you are unfortunate because you are not measuring a device which has the zero TC and low noise point close to each other. I would quickly test some other devices that you have (hint  ;) ).
« Last Edit: September 12, 2018, 10:44:11 am by SvanGool »
# Don't hurry, the past will wait. #
 

Offline branadic

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2390
  • Country: de
  • Sounds like noise
Re: Ultra Low Noise Reference 2DW232, 2DW233, 2DW23x
« Reply #558 on: September 12, 2018, 05:30:09 pm »
No, I'm not unfortunate, it's simply scientifics everyday, sometimes you loose and sometimes others are winning :)
I repeated the 10h measurement at 3.29mA and again can see excess popcorn noise so it's neither the heater influence nor a measuring artefact, but fact.

So the only option is to use this device at 5mA and because of positive t.c. with a more stable oven. Work in progress...

Meanwhile I can again take a look at the samples I received from the netherlands ;)

-branadic-
« Last Edit: September 14, 2018, 03:31:47 pm by branadic »
Computers exist to solve problems that we wouldn't have without them. AI exists to answer questions, we wouldn't ask without it.
 

Offline Andreas

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3244
  • Country: de
Re: Ultra Low Noise Reference 2DW232, 2DW233, 2DW23x
« Reply #559 on: September 12, 2018, 08:35:21 pm »
Hello branadic,

according to data sheet the zero T.C. point is more at 65 deg C than at room temperature.
Perhaps worth a try.

with best regards

Andreas
 

Offline branadic

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2390
  • Country: de
  • Sounds like noise
Re: Ultra Low Noise Reference 2DW232, 2DW233, 2DW23x
« Reply #560 on: September 12, 2018, 08:57:33 pm »
Well, with respect to blackdog even shorting the resistor on the crystal heater would only give 50°C.

Quote
The oven
The first problem is the temperature of the QH40A, which is about 41C and too low for my application.
The components that I mount on it also generate heat and then it goes roughly at 35 to 36 degrees, I estimate.
That means that kidney can be arranged more properly.
So ... that is "Reverse Engeneration" and that is successful, the circuit is very simple.
An opamp and a bridge circuit with a PTC of 2K in one leg.
The manufacturer has probably already taken into account a different temperature.
After I had drawn the diagram and what had counted on it turned out pretty simpe.
There is a 560 Ohm resistor in a part of the bridge, if you short-circuit it he will cut to about 52C.
Exactly what I needed to have him arrange reasonably on a summer day.



So for 65°C it needs a different oven design. Where did you find 65°C? I had in mind that a t.c. value of 5ppm/k between 25°C and 75°C is given in the datasheet.

-branadic-
« Last Edit: September 12, 2018, 09:09:01 pm by branadic »
Computers exist to solve problems that we wouldn't have without them. AI exists to answer questions, we wouldn't ask without it.
 

Offline Kleinstein

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 14181
  • Country: de
Re: Ultra Low Noise Reference 2DW232, 2DW233, 2DW23x
« Reply #561 on: September 13, 2018, 05:58:02 am »
Hello branadic,

according to data sheet the zero T.C. point is more at 65 deg C than at room temperature.
Perhaps worth a try.

with best regards

Andreas

The TC depends on temperature and current.  A relatively small change in current is sufficient to shift the temperature for zero first order TC. The curve in the DS is just an example curve.
 

Offline Andreas

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3244
  • Country: de
Re: Ultra Low Noise Reference 2DW232, 2DW233, 2DW23x
« Reply #562 on: September 13, 2018, 06:12:36 am »

So for 65°C it needs a different oven design. Where did you find 65°C? I had in mind that a t.c. value of 5ppm/k between 25°C and 75°C is given in the datasheet.


https://www.eevblog.com/forum/metrology/ultra-low-noise-reference-2dw232-2dw233-2dw23x/?action=dlattach;attach=509624

See figure 1 (Typical curve)

ok its more 55 - 60 deg C for the flat top.

But it is a typical curve (so some reserve in temperature range cannot be bad).

with best regards

Andreas
 

Offline Kleinstein

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 14181
  • Country: de
Re: Ultra Low Noise Reference 2DW232, 2DW233, 2DW23x
« Reply #563 on: September 13, 2018, 03:20:09 pm »
With changing the current one can adjust the linear TC and thus the Temperature where the zero crossing will occur.  With a just slightly different current one can usually (if the unit is OK)  get it at any point in the usual temperature range (e.g. -50 V to +150 C). There is nothing special about 55-60 C

So it is OK to first design the oven part for a suitable temperature and than adjust the TC via the current.  The oven temperature has to take into account the self heating that can be quite a bit if 20 mA are needed. 50-60 C could be a suitable temperature if high ambient is allowed for. With a moderate ambient it could be 45 C.
 

Offline branadic

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2390
  • Country: de
  • Sounds like noise
Re: Ultra Low Noise Reference 2DW232, 2DW233, 2DW23x
« Reply #564 on: September 13, 2018, 06:16:36 pm »
Even though it's not directly related to the topic I use this place to correct for the circuit of the QH40A heater here, as I've already linked to the circuit.

Quote
So it is OK to first design the oven part for a suitable temperature and than adjust the TC via the current.  The oven temperature has to take into account the self heating that can be quite a bit if 20 mA are needed. 50-60 C could be a suitable temperature if high ambient is allowed for. With a moderate ambient it could be 45 C.

Well, that's only half of the truth... for a portable reference you want low current, but also zero t.c. so you need to find a sample with zero t.c. at idealy room temperature on lowest current. Furthermore you have to watch for popcorn noise at this low current and prove that it's low noise. At the end it's a trade-off between temperature, current and noise.

-branadic-
Computers exist to solve problems that we wouldn't have without them. AI exists to answer questions, we wouldn't ask without it.
 

Offline branadic

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2390
  • Country: de
  • Sounds like noise
Re: Ultra Low Noise Reference 2DW232, 2DW233, 2DW23x
« Reply #565 on: September 17, 2018, 07:53:16 am »
Did some measurements on the 5x 2DW232 samples from the netherland this weekend...

-branadic-
« Last Edit: September 17, 2018, 11:02:33 am by branadic »
Computers exist to solve problems that we wouldn't have without them. AI exists to answer questions, we wouldn't ask without it.
 

Offline iMo

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4766
  • Country: nr
  • It's important to try new things..
Re: Ultra Low Noise Reference 2DW232, 2DW233, 2DW23x
« Reply #566 on: September 17, 2018, 01:33:21 pm »
Above diodes: that means 50-60ppm/C in an average?
 

Offline Kleinstein

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 14181
  • Country: de
Re: Ultra Low Noise Reference 2DW232, 2DW233, 2DW23x
« Reply #567 on: September 17, 2018, 04:20:53 pm »
The later diodes (no 2-5) seem to need a considerably lower current for low TC.
So these samples seem to be very much on the low current side opposed to the samples from the other source.

It is quite annoying having so much scattering. I thing they should do a little more binning / sorting in china, so one would know wether one gets a diode good for operation a 1 mA in series mode for a low power reference or one good for 5 mA in series mode if power is not an issue or one good for 1-2 mA in Zener only mode for a 5.2 V reference (to divide down to 5 V with little errors from the resistors). All 3 cases can be interesting, but different applications and normally different part numbers.
 

Offline GigaJoe

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 485
  • Country: ca
Re: Ultra Low Noise Reference 2DW232, 2DW233, 2DW23x
« Reply #568 on: October 05, 2018, 10:05:11 pm »
this one , made in the 17th century, I think,   covered with patina.
for over 100 years,  it should be pretty stable
« Last Edit: October 05, 2018, 10:40:54 pm by GigaJoe »
 

Offline branadic

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2390
  • Country: de
  • Sounds like noise
Re: Ultra Low Noise Reference 2DW232, 2DW233, 2DW23x
« Reply #569 on: October 06, 2018, 04:09:28 pm »
Measured a lil' bit on a first sample 2DW233 from the netherlands. With 10ppm/K @ 7.5mA it's still not meating my understanding of t.c. given in the datasheet. So maybe Andreas is right and the spec means, if you draw a line between 25°C point and 75°C point this line has a slope of 5ppm/K. Such a value would be useless as it ignores everything in between, so I take it as a marketing gag.
However, I can find an operating point at a current of 4.3mA so I can operate it heated with my crystal heater. Need to look for noise.

Still have another 4 samples for testing.

-branadic-
Computers exist to solve problems that we wouldn't have without them. AI exists to answer questions, we wouldn't ask without it.
 
The following users thanked this post: SvanGool

Offline Kleinstein

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 14181
  • Country: de
Re: Ultra Low Noise Reference 2DW232, 2DW233, 2DW23x
« Reply #570 on: October 06, 2018, 04:26:53 pm »
The scattering in parameters seem to be rather large. So compare the 2DW232 more too an 1N821 than 1N829.  If the current for zero TC is still in a good range (like 3-10 mA) this is not such a big problem. To get a low TC one would need an individually matched current anyway. A small search range helps a little, but not that much.

The bad ones are those that need more than 10 mA in series mode, which would be quite a lot of self heating. These might still be of some use in a different mode (e.g. zener only or 2 zeners + 1 diode).
 

Offline GigaJoe

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 485
  • Country: ca
Re: Ultra Low Noise Reference 2DW232, 2DW233, 2DW23x
« Reply #571 on: October 07, 2018, 04:08:04 am »
Well, i have 233
and connecting in parallel 2 internal diode, simply. TC is "U" shape ; if temp UP  and low current  V down,  high current V up.  to  find a neutral spot is a time and patience,  my record approx. +0.15ppm/C. 

so from that above, that has a month in 120-150C and current 25ma im building 6 in parallel,  in assumption that some has negative and some positive TC,  due to current , and able to self compensate.

btw feeding by precise 10V a low TC spot offer 1023 Ohm resistor. after month it 880 ohm,  so parameters  i assumed drifted significantly.
233 2 diodes in parallel approx 4ma. for low TC, to adjust low TC spot i use 20ohm multi-turn trimmer.   using an owen even more fun as possible to compensate even  current resistors drift, due to positive or negative diode TC.  just adjust the current
 
"after month" - I mean 30 days, under 140C and 25ma.

they oxidize significantly,  even legs lost some coating and to tinned it back i have to use some crazy flux.
« Last Edit: October 07, 2018, 05:29:30 am by GigaJoe »
 

Offline IconicPCB

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1534
  • Country: au
Re: Ultra Low Noise Reference 2DW232, 2DW233, 2DW23x
« Reply #572 on: October 07, 2018, 04:49:09 am »
Giga Joe,

What is the spread of currents ( resistors at nominally 10V )?
 

Offline GigaJoe

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 485
  • Country: ca
Re: Ultra Low Noise Reference 2DW232, 2DW233, 2DW23x
« Reply #573 on: October 07, 2018, 05:16:32 am »
Uh ... I'm actually just started building the  board,  so all this measurements and so ..  And tell precisely later what happens ... But as I can recall spread from 4.1ma to 4.6 ma per diode in parallel I think i played with 4-5 of them. The biggest trouble to use it , was an internal resistance,  60-80 ohm,  means even slightest current change and everything changed. Like in comparison LM399 0.1 ohm but yes it not  a pure zener. 


 

Offline Kleinstein

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 14181
  • Country: de
Re: Ultra Low Noise Reference 2DW232, 2DW233, 2DW23x
« Reply #574 on: October 07, 2018, 07:28:37 am »
The higher differential resistance is a downside of using it at a lower current.  60-80 Ohms is really quite high for a current around 4 mA.
The LM399 is not a fair comparison here, as it includes an internal amplifier and current source. One should more compare it to zener references like the 1N825 which gives <10-15 Ohms  at 7.5 mA.  So yes it needs a reasonable stable resistor.

Operating in the 4-5 mA range is nice, as it limits self heating to a reasonable level. I don't think one would use several in parallel of these, as the noise level should already be low enough for most practical applications. More like using 2 in series (or a bridge circuit) to get a reference of around 10.5 V and than divide down to 10.
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf