Author Topic: Ultra Precision Reference LTZ1000  (Read 1487050 times)

jpz and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Noopy

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2016
  • Country: de
    • Richis-Lab
Re: Ultra Precision Reference LTZ1000
« Reply #3325 on: January 11, 2025, 06:55:09 am »
I expect that AD generally treats any changes on any component following the Automotive rules, as their QA processes will not distinguish between the commercial and automotive business.

The companies have to invest some money and manpower to fulfill the automotive requirements. I don´t think they do it for all their parts.
They won´t have totally different QA processes but if you can cut corners without getting problems...
(In fact I assume it is the other way round: The consumer QA process is the baseline and then you put additional requirements on top of it if you have an automotive or military part.)


Are you also working @ Automotive?

Yes, for 15 years now. Are you in this area too?

Offline Dr. Frank

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2447
  • Country: de
Re: Ultra Precision Reference LTZ1000
« Reply #3326 on: January 11, 2025, 07:08:52 am »
I expect that AD generally treats any changes on any component following the Automotive rules, as their QA processes will not distinguish between the commercial and automotive business.

The companies have to invest some money and manpower to fulfill the automotive requirements. I don´t think they do it for all their parts.
They won´t have totally different QA processes but if you can cut corners without getting problems...
(In fact I assume it is the other way round: The consumer QA process is the baseline and then you put additional requirements on top of it if you have an automotive or military part.)


Are you also working @ Automotive?

Yes, for 15 years now. Are you in this area too?
Yes, since 29 years: First and shortly @ SQM for electronic parts in manufacturing, then in R&D, Component - Management, - Technologies, PCN, PTN, R&D processes, PLM, Maturity processes for components and products, Robust Design, and so forth.
Actually, the R&D assessment part of the ZVEI matrices were developed in my team, 20 years ago, and I'm still working on that PCN/PTN stuff.

Suppliers (Tier2's) usually stick to Automotive rules for all of their components, as soon as they deliver only one device to us.

Frank 
 

Offline Noopy

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2016
  • Country: de
    • Richis-Lab
Re: Ultra Precision Reference LTZ1000
« Reply #3327 on: January 11, 2025, 07:54:16 am »
Oh, cool!
I did a lot of R&D stuff but always hardware related, trying to avoid software wherever it was possible.  ;D
Since 2,5 years I'm now in our Robust Design department: consultant for R&D, (schematic and layout) reviews, hardware change management, validation, failure analysis, obsolescence management, supply security (the technical side),...
Who knows perhaps we will accidentally meet.  ;D

As you know at work we never ever want to see non-automotive parts. I was told you can never be sure what you get if you choose non-automotive. For sure it's not just black and white.
...I will ask the next application engineer I meet.  :)

Richard


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf