Well, maybe we should start tinkering.
The device has two 4.0V batteries.
And a LD1117AG voltage dropper.
If we can replace these to higher values there is some hope.
Sure that it's worth improving this TE.
If you can raise the AC test voltage the TE provides at its outputs, you will also have to add some attenuation on the X axis channel of the display.
For these 'octopus' devices, the trace on the X axis (voltage axis) should always have the same width (which is close to the full screen width, or as wide as the graticule, if displayed). Of course, this is only true when there's no DUT connected to the output(s).
If there's enough room, try to add a DPDT switch, so you can select between two ranges : one circuit will change the feedback resistor of the LD1117AG. The second circuit inserts an attenuator (= basic resistive divider) in the X channel measurement path.
Update #1If the batteries (Li-ion I assume) are close to empty, you will have just a bit more than 5 VDC in the 2S configuration.
I don't know if an in deep circuit analysis is feasible but as ultimate goal, it would be interesting to be able to separate the power supply of the sine generator (so that measurement voltage can be raised to 10 VACpeak or perhaps even 20 VACpeak by using a
small booster) from the supply of the processing assembly (probably 3,3 VDC).
10 VACpeak (= 20 VACpp) sine waveform output is doable if the TL084 opamps are supplied with at least ± 15VDC (± 18VDC max).
For 20 VACpeak (= 40 VACpp) output, an additional
high voltage opamp is required. The low values series resistors must also be replaced by parts with higher power dissipation.*
Update #2We started a deeper analysis of the TE circuit below,
so several sentences in this post are no longer valid :
- LD1117AG is a fixed value regulator : it's output voltage cannot be changed as easily as indicated here.
- Presumably, there's a boost regulator after the Li-Ion batteries. So even close to empty, there should be enough voltage for the downstream circuits.