-
I am interested in an IDE paid is fine to work on microchip/atmel sam parts. Any recommendations? I'm not after a ton of libraries, I am really just interested in an IDE that works without being a computer scientist and linux guru.
-
Have a look at platformio with Visual Code to see if it supports the micros you need. It automagically takes care of some of the setup for you https://platformio.org/
-
What's wrong with MPLABX?
-
If interested in the ARM-based ones, use Keil uVision 5.
-
What's wrong with MPLABX?
Don't even go there. I want commercial support, not one company blaming the bunch of hippies who's amateur project they decided to use to save themselves time instead of doing the job properly. I'm so close to instead investing the time in doing it all on the command line.... -
Quote
PlatformIO
MPLABX
Keil
Oof... Man... Someone come in and say some vendor's implementation on top of Eclipse for the fourth horseman. ffs, I'm sorry but I have used those three options and you couldn't pay me enough to go back to any of them. PIO is fine for their tutorials and terrible once you need to do a single thing outside the normal, Microchip known universally for their excellent software is a great idea and I can't possibly disagree, and Keil... Which is only 20 years behind any decent IDE although the CC compiler is fine it isn't supported like GCC.
I'm not great at embedded OP, but look.... I'm going to give you the best advice you'll get all day, feel free to ignore it.
VS Code, GCC, CMake, DevContainers. No paid, no off the shelf solution, no vendor, works everywhere. Man up, but know that you'll have a support group for you.
If you forced me to pay for something, maybe CLion, or Visual Studio actual-not-Code set up with GCC and those two options are they're the only two popular options that I don't have experience with or know enough to hate them yet
It would be a strong force to rip me away from VS Code.
-
Right. So everyone is banging on about CMSIS, sure, sure, best thing since sliced bread and it does all the work for you even your dishes. What does it actually do? Is this just CPU related stuff or is this supposed to be peripheral support as well. I have downloaded it I think as seeing for myself is faster than expecting any vendor to tell me and all I see is CPU related stuff. Is that correct?
-
I like Code::Blocks - As it's fast (written in C) - But no commercial support i think
https://www.codeblocks.org/
But also uses Eclipse, if i (absolutely) have to ...
I'm so "old school" that i often use makefiles, even in CB.
CB is just an IDE ... You have to install & add the (path to) compiler & libs your self
/Bingo -
what I lack is how to set up the entire tool chain. So I aim to learn to do it on the command line so that I understand the entire process. then I can go looking for another IDE an understand how to set it up. Looked at uVision 5 it's crap, it won't do uint8_t type, types, as soon as I include inttypes.h the compiler does not like it's contents.
Tried kiel cmsis under visual studio code and it failed to locate it's own cmsis header file that was sitting there in the project. I'm just so fed up with it all. I want to write code, not fix other peoples lousy IDE's.
I don't know if there are other options for SAMC or any micro controller under VSC that make any sense, the next bit of fun is debugging although at this point I am almost willing to write my own serial port code to debug with. -
You can still get
AtmelMicrochip Studio. It's based on Visual Studio rather than Eclipse, so pick your poison. Not sure what kind of support you'd get from Microchip for it, but it's all just arm-gcc under the hood and one install to get started, with full interactive debug etc.
It has some quirks, but IME most problems can be solved by deleting the .atsuo file from your project (it will be recreated automatically). -
Looked at uVision 5 it's crap, it won't do uint8_t type, types, as soon as I include inttypes.h the compiler does not like it's contents.
Tried kiel cmsis under visual studio code and it failed to locate it's own cmsis header file that was sitting there in the project. I'm just so fed up with it all. I want to write code, not fix other peoples lousy IDE's.
It is not inttypes.h, but <stdint.h> or <cstdint>.
Keil MDK6 on Visual Studio Code is still, at best, at beta stage. I am yet to first successfully compile with it any previous uVision 5 project. -
I am interested in an IDE [...]
Perhaps you should specify what you think of as an IDE, or what features/facilities you would expect. There are many variations on the theme, and without knowing what you're actually looking for people will propose whatever they like as The Solution.
As a for instance, when I did PIC stuff I loathed MPLab (and don't start on MPLabX, as you note) so I used it purely as a compiler. I used Slickedit for the IDE, which is far FAR better as an editor than any proprietary IDE editor. After all, most of my time is going to be editing, and I want multiple windows, object lookups, etc. The downside of that approach was I had to - horrors! - click on a different window to perform a compile. Even so, any errors could be picked up by Slickedit and drop me at the exact point in a file where I boobed (but, over time, I've realised that's not so important as it once was).
So there I'm using two 'IDEs' and I'm willing to bet that if I'd come on here asking what would suit me, no-one would ever come up with that solution.
I'm not saying that's how you should work; I am saying that if you don't specify what you want/need/expect then you might as well ask for link to random application downloads. -
Keil MDK6 on Visual Studio Code is still, at best, at beta stage. I am yet to first successfully compile with it any previous uVision 5 project.
If you absolutely had to have a paid compiler, this seems like a good option.
I'm sure they still find a way to get their failed PACK system into this, right? The system that no one supports anymore and you're going to be on your own quickly anyhow so why bother? But still... At least you're dumping the worst part of Kiel their ancient IDE in favor of the world's best text editor.
I feel like some of these other responses are bizzaro-world.
OP, time to learn. Yea, it sucks to set up your first tool chain. But it's not like there aren't a ton of guides to do this. If you find someone using dev containers, just get a copy of their devcontainer.json and their dockerfile.... Done! Now you have a fully running system.
OR.... Go purchase something and then wind up where I'm telling you to go now, just in a 3-5 years of lost time. -
I am still mostly using Atmel Studio for ATSAMC21 / ATSAME51, now called Microchip Studio.
This is because everytime I tried to use MPLAB-X it ended badly and I know that Microchip made the Includes used in MPLAB-X incompatible, so I could not really re-use the code I already have anyways.
I am considering to use a different controller from a different manufacturer before switching over to MPLAB-X.
PlatformIO, as much as like to use it with VSCode, it does not really work for me with ATSAM since platform-atmelsam does not support Baremetal / CMSIS, at least not the official and "supported" version on https://github.com/platformio/platform-atmelsam - it supports either Arduino or Zephyr.
There was a pull-request for CMSIS support and it works, but it completely got ignored.
And this is typical for PlatformIO, often enough you get Arduino support only, another example would be Raspberry Pi RP2040.
Needing to use a different controller than already is supported is another issue, I have two STM32 Nucleo boards that I can not use
with PlatformIO and I am waiting for support to catch on for over a year now.
Sometimes things break in PlatformIO, because of whatever and searching for the issue leads to tickets that are generally several years old,
at this point it is a good idea to remove PlatformIO and re-install it.
Ok, less ranting, more positivity.
Another option might be Segger Embedded Studio.
I have not tried to use it with ATSAM and recently had issues trying to use it with TIs TM4C, but did not get very far.
I just installed the ATSAMC21 and ATSAME51 support packges and setup a project for the ATSAME51.
And at least this results in a project that compiles.
But I am facing the same issue as with the TM4C, that main.c is exactly the same and there is nothing that is target specific and no hint how to go from there.Code: [Select]#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
int main(void) {
int i;
for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
printf("Hello World %d!\n", i);
}
do {
i++;
} while (1);
}
Now what?
I want to program a micro-controller, not a x86 DOS box.
Microchip-Studio adds a #include "sam.h" which gives you all the includes for the controller.
And this seems to work for Segger Embedded Studio as well - I could not find any hint in regards of that though.
And most of the code with registers I imported into the main.c does not work, likely because Microchip f*cked up the includes.
Oh, yes: "Copyright (c) 2023 Microchip Technology Inc. and its subsidiaries.", splendid.
The packages are installed here:
C:\Users\****\AppData\Local\SEGGER\SEGGER Embedded Studio\v8\packages
And now I saw that for TM4C I probably need to include SEGGER_TM4C.h.
Apart from issues with the includes which Segger could help with by adding more target specific examples,
Segger Embedded Studio looks like an alternative to the Microchip Studio now.
The pain with the ATSAM includes though is entirely on Microchip and something I likely do not forgive Microchip. -
But I am facing the same issue as with the TM4C, that main.c is exactly the same and there is nothing that is target specific and no hint how to go from there.Code: [Select]#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
int main(void) {
int i;
for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
printf("Hello World %d!\n", i);
}
do {
i++;
} while (1);
}
Now what?
maybe add a putc() routine to tell it what to do with that printf ?
-
@simon,
I have a couple of suggestions.
Segger Embedded Studio
Rowley crossworks for ARM
both are based on gcc and the usual suspects, however they might just offer the thing you are looking for - support.
I have used rowley briefly but I seem to recall good things about it. keep in mind, its interface is not "modern". Not that its a bad thing, just the way it is.
SES is excellent but expensive.. IIRC it is free upto 32K or so. Again, the interface is nothing to crow about.
Please keep in mind both of them come with their share of learning curves, but its more or less a one time investment as the IDEs do support a variety of devices across manufacturers.
I have not used Atmel SAM series, but I have used SES for other stuff - nrf chips, silabs efm chips and stm32 stuff..
SES has ozone which is hands down the best debugger ( GUI types ) for debugging.
Having said that, I still use gcc + makefiles + gdb for my professional and personal work . :-D -
Did you try IAR Embedded workbench? ($$$)
-
Did you try IAR Embedded workbench? ($$$)
You mean the people that want to know all about you before they will even quote? just to make sure the charge enough. -
A little heads up on Microchip IDE. First catogory under dev tools.Code: [Select]
24011 DEV1 : Next Generation MPLAB® IDE
The next-generation MPLAB IDE is based on Microsoft Visual Studio Code and Eclipse Theia™, providing existing VS Code® users with a familiar development environment.
This class will provide a hands-on experience on how to use VS Code extensions for MPLAB IDE to create, build and debug embedded applications.
https://techtrain.microchip.com/usmasters/classes.aspx
-
Another commercial one is VisualGDB which is build on the real visual studio (didn't use it, so can't comment more)
Alternatively a plain old eclipse CDT + MCU on eclipse plugin. Not a single click installation and it's still eclipse with it's annoying 20+ yo bugs, but works.Right. So everyone is banging on about CMSIS, sure, sure, best thing since sliced bread and it does all the work for you even your dishes. What does it actually do? Is this just CPU related stuff or is this supposed to be peripheral support as well. I have downloaded it I think as seeing for myself is faster than expecting any vendor to tell me and all I see is CPU related stuff. Is that correct?
Theoretically it's just basic headers common to all cortex-m + a bit of device specific headers (startup code, definitions of registers, bitfields etc.).
In reality "CMSIS" is most often used to refer to a ST SPL or in some instances, ST HAL. -
lol.... Rowley and Segger Embedded Studio.... Corporate wants you to find the difference in these two pictures. They're the exact same product.
Oh man, I feel bad that at one point I searched on this exact topic. I thought I needed "support". And I got all the same info.
IAR, Keil, Rowley, MPLab... wow embedded moves slowly.
Good luck OP. -
A little heads up on Microchip IDE. First catogory under dev tools.
Code: [Select]24011 DEV1 : Next Generation MPLAB® IDE
The next-generation MPLAB IDE is based on Microsoft Visual Studio Code and Eclipse Theia™, providing existing VS Code® users with a familiar development environment.
This class will provide a hands-on experience on how to use VS Code extensions for MPLAB IDE to create, build and debug embedded applications.
https://techtrain.microchip.com/usmasters/classes.aspx
You mean they have seen the light and will release a new MPLAB based on visual studio? -
A little heads up on Microchip IDE. First catogory under dev tools.
Code: [Select]24011 DEV1 : Next Generation MPLAB® IDE
The next-generation MPLAB IDE is based on Microsoft Visual Studio Code and Eclipse Theia™, providing existing VS Code® users with a familiar development environment.
This class will provide a hands-on experience on how to use VS Code extensions for MPLAB IDE to create, build and debug embedded applications.
https://techtrain.microchip.com/usmasters/classes.aspx
You mean they have seen the light and will release a new MPLAB based on visual studio?
You mean that humongous IDE that is unable to open more than one project at once? Or the glorified text editor full of telemetry (also basically unable to keep more than one project at once in the same window)? If you want that experience there is the VSLABX plugin that transforms VSCode in a glorified editor for microchip projects, but you need to keep MPLABX on the side to create, program, debug anyway
We'll probably see in september after the MASTERs
-
Looked at uVision 5 it's crap, it won't do uint8_t type, types, as soon as I include inttypes.h the compiler does not like it's contents.
Tried kiel cmsis under visual studio code and it failed to locate it's own cmsis header file that was sitting there in the project. I'm just so fed up with it all. I want to write code, not fix other peoples lousy IDE's.
It is not inttypes.h, but <stdint.h> or <cstdint>.
Keil MDK6 on Visual Studio Code is still, at best, at beta stage. I am yet to first successfully compile with it any previous uVision 5 project.
So I used µVision 5, this is the old one you can use for free, the idea was to evaluate for the paid version. But there is this MDK6 that is the new version. Does that mean that µVision 5 is not the actual program that we would purchase? -
A little heads up on Microchip IDE. First catogory under dev tools.
Code: [Select]24011 DEV1 : Next Generation MPLAB® IDE
The next-generation MPLAB IDE is based on Microsoft Visual Studio Code and Eclipse Theia™, providing existing VS Code® users with a familiar development environment.
This class will provide a hands-on experience on how to use VS Code extensions for MPLAB IDE to create, build and debug embedded applications.
https://techtrain.microchip.com/usmasters/classes.aspx
So they're finally gonna trash away that horrific Netbeans?
If true, I can stick to Microchip Studio and forget about transitioning to MPLABX