« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: i.MX1064....  (Read 1860 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ali_asadzadehTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1906
  • Country: ca
i.MX1064....
« on: November 10, 2018, 07:23:10 am »
Hi,
Is NXP on fire? I just have completed the first PCB design of i.MX1050 part, and yet they have released a lot of parts, like this new 1064 and 600 parts, I wonder if 1064 are pin compatible to the 1050, also when we should expect 1GHz parts ^-^ ^-^ ^-^

Also today I have downloaded segger embedded studio, is it good to work with i.MX parts, since they would let you use their good stuff free for non-commercial use.
Logged
ASiDesigner, Stands for Application specific intelligent devices
I'm a Digital Expert from 8-bits to 64-bits
 

Offline krho

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 223
  • Country: si
Re: i.MX1064....
« Reply #1 on: November 10, 2018, 02:11:03 pm »
They might be with parts that nobody wants. However the im,x7ULP has been marked as in PREPRODUCTION for the past 18 months. ANd when it will be out it will be "obsolete"
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: ali_asadzadeh

Offline ehughes

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 409
  • Country: us
Re: i.MX1064....
« Reply #2 on: November 12, 2018, 07:49:56 pm »
You haven't seen anything yet :-)
Logged
 

Offline ali_asadzadehTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1906
  • Country: ca
Re: i.MX1064....
« Reply #3 on: November 13, 2018, 05:46:17 am »
Quote
You haven't seen anything yet :-)
what have you seen? :D ;D ^-^ ^-^ ^-^ share with us ;)
Logged
ASiDesigner, Stands for Application specific intelligent devices
I'm a Digital Expert from 8-bits to 64-bits
 

Offline Marco

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6723
  • Country: nl
Re: i.MX1064....
« Reply #4 on: November 13, 2018, 06:41:43 am »
Quote from: krho on November 10, 2018, 02:11:03 pm
They might be with parts that nobody wants. However the im,x7ULP has been marked as in PREPRODUCTION for the past 18 months. ANd when it will be out it will be "obsolete"
Is anyone actually shipping a FD-SOI  ARM SOC?
Logged
 

Offline brabus

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 326
  • Country: it
Re: i.MX1064....
« Reply #5 on: November 13, 2018, 08:14:41 am »
One vital advice if you work with Freescale: Check the ERRATA sheet.

You may end up writing one yourself. :-D
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: JPortici

Offline ehughes

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 409
  • Country: us
Re: i.MX1064....
« Reply #6 on: November 14, 2018, 02:11:43 pm »
Quote
Is anyone actually shipping a FD-SOI  ARM SOC?

Yes.

The i.MX8 quad max is FD-SOI as well as the i.MX RT (MCU).   

I have an MEK with the i.MX7ULP with B0 silicon.   It definitely exists.   Keep in mind that most of these chips are 1st produced for a large volume customer.      This particular chip has gone through an extended test cycle with key customers.   It is a nice little chip for the right application.   

Logged
 

Offline Marco

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6723
  • Country: nl
Re: i.MX1064....
« Reply #7 on: November 14, 2018, 03:54:36 pm »
Quote from: ehughes on November 14, 2018, 02:11:43 pm
The i.MX8 quad max is FD-SOI as well as the i.MX RT (MCU).   

Of the MX8 series only the MX8M is in production, the factsheet of the MX8 says FDSOI ... the one for MX8M does not. Same for RT, the only they explicitly say is FDSOI is the RT600, pre-production again.

They might have planned more of those lines to be FDSOI long ago, but I think they transitioned as it became clear it wasn't going to work. The 0.9V supply voltage for that MX8M isn't really that low and the one for the RT1050 is min 1.15 ... I doubt that's even 28nm.
Logged
 
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »

Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf

 


EEVblog Main Site EEVblog on Youtube EEVblog on Twitter EEVblog on Facebook EEVblog on Odysee