Author Topic: Yeah.. which micro?  (Read 18872 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline DrG

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • !
  • Posts: 1199
  • Country: us
Re: Yeah.. which micro?
« Reply #75 on: December 10, 2021, 11:20:03 pm »
As a result of this thread (and maybe because I am sick of selecting holiday gifts for others), I ordered this, from Espressif and through Amazon and it is scheduled to arrive in a few days...

https://www.amazon.com/Espressif-ESP32-C3-DevKitM-1-Development-Board/dp/B08W2J9B8J

Pretty quick delivery. Hey does this count as an 'unboxing'?  ;)

« Last Edit: December 10, 2021, 11:22:28 pm by DrG »
- Invest in science - it pays big dividends. -
 
The following users thanked this post: ssashton

Online tszaboo

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8568
  • Country: nl
  • Current job: ATEX product design
Re: Yeah.. which micro?
« Reply #76 on: December 12, 2021, 02:59:28 pm »
I wonder how they screwed up a simple ADC so badly? It's not exactly a new and exotic feature in the world of microcontrollers.

And it's not that simple either.
Many major vendors use ADC IPs they either carefully crafted over the years, or just buy existing IPs. Here they probably wanted to cut costs and had no prior experience with designing ADCs.

Typical microcontrollers run at ~80MHz, these ESP32s at 400. I guess they are using different process nodes, and they might have different analog characteristics. It could be as simple as too much ESR on an analog switch or leakage current too high on the SAR capacitors. You probably know this though.
 

Offline d-smes

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 101
  • Country: us
Re: Yeah.. which micro?
« Reply #77 on: December 12, 2021, 04:23:46 pm »
As a (big) step up from ATMEGA328 boards, I went with Teensy boards which are 32-bit ARM based (48 MHz Cortex-M0+ to 600 MHz Cortex-M7).  See https://www.pjrc.com/teensy/.  They have a Teensyduino add-on for the Arduino IDE which makes migration a no brainer.  And more libraries to take advantage of modern peripherals.
 

Offline Picuino

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1215
  • Country: es
    • Picuino website
Re: Yeah.. which micro?
« Reply #78 on: December 12, 2021, 06:17:25 pm »
You can use an arduino Pro Mini directly solded on your board. Cheap, tiny and accompanied by oscillator, voltage regulator, capacitors, reset button, power led.
https://www.aliexpress.com/item/32672852945.html
« Last Edit: December 12, 2021, 06:19:53 pm by Picuino »
 

Offline brucehoult

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5162
  • Country: nz
Re: Yeah.. which micro?
« Reply #79 on: December 12, 2021, 07:17:40 pm »
As a (big) step up from ATMEGA328 boards, I went with Teensy boards which are 32-bit ARM based (48 MHz Cortex-M0+ to 600 MHz Cortex-M7).  See https://www.pjrc.com/teensy/.  They have a Teensyduino add-on for the Arduino IDE which makes migration a no brainer.  And more libraries to take advantage of modern peripherals.

Only Teensy 3.0 and later are ARM. They started as AVR for the first few generations.

They are nice boards. They have a really slick Out-of-the-Box-Experience these days. Zero to blinky in a couple of minutes.
 

Online DavidAlfa

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6575
  • Country: es
Re: Yeah.. which micro?
« Reply #80 on: December 26, 2021, 09:15:18 pm »
Damn, I hate black PCBs....
Never understood that, they look cheap and dirty.
Hantek DSO2x1x            Drive        FAQ          DON'T BUY HANTEK! (Aka HALF-MADE)
Stm32 Soldering FW      Forum      Github      Donate
 

Offline james_s

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 21611
  • Country: us
Re: Yeah.. which micro?
« Reply #81 on: December 27, 2021, 11:04:26 pm »
I quite like them, I've used black PCBs in a few projects where the PCB was going to be visible and I think black looks quite nice. In this case though who cares? It's a development board, I struggle to think of a way the PCB color would be relevant at all.
 

Online westfw

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4414
  • Country: us
Re: Yeah.. which micro?
« Reply #82 on: December 28, 2021, 12:32:55 am »
Quote
It's a development board, I struggle to think of a way the PCB color would be relevant at all.
For some types of "development", it's nice to be able to see the tracks clearly, so you can trace signals and check against the way the circuit is supposed to be.I personally would avoid black, white, and other "opaque" soldermasks on boards where the board itself is being "developed."  (but I don't dislike them on "done" boards, unless I'm needing to reverse-engineer something.)
 

Offline Siwastaja

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 9779
  • Country: fi
Re: Yeah.. which micro?
« Reply #83 on: December 28, 2021, 04:19:36 pm »
Yeah, black is the worst in development boards because actual development often involves doing quick everyday reverse-engineering tasks (just quickly see where the traces go, that's quicker than trying to look if the manuals explain this), or even small modifications to the board.
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf