« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Nick Sayer: DFM: Building 10^n isn't the same as building one  (Read 2445 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SeanBTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 16276
  • Country: za
Nick Sayer: DFM: Building 10^n isn't the same as building one
« on: December 24, 2015, 05:42:27 pm »
Nick Sayer: DFM: Building 10^n isn't the same as building one



 A little detail from Hackaday, and why building a one off is a little easier than a thousand.
Logged
 

Offline pmbrunelle

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 183
  • Country: ca
  • lost mech. guy
Re: Nick Sayer: DFM: Building 10^n isn't the same as building one
« Reply #1 on: December 31, 2015, 04:46:47 am »
Not the same.

But like he said, the key is prototyping.

Before going into production, you want to assemble progressively larger batches of parts, with feedback from production at each iteration.

Hopefully with each refinement/iteration there is some sort of convergence going on...

The idea is also to debug/tune the production tooling jigs, and not only to refine the product design.
« Last Edit: December 31, 2015, 04:48:39 am by pmbrunelle »
Logged
 

Offline Kalvin

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2145
  • Country: fi
  • Embedded SW/HW.
Re: Nick Sayer: DFM: Building 10^n isn't the same as building one
« Reply #2 on: December 31, 2015, 02:47:40 pm »
It really doesn't hurt either to let someone else to assemble and test few boards as well.
Logged
 
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »

Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf

 


EEVblog Main Site EEVblog on Youtube EEVblog on Twitter EEVblog on Facebook EEVblog on Odysee