And with that said, I'm not 100% sure what the OP's point is.
I think that's an
indicator.
Let's give another example: the chief officer of Finnish Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority, basically the watchdog, pensioned, and the very next day was hired to a Russian nuclear project. It is not illegal per se, but it's an
indicator. While French nuclear project was slowed down, and Russian one not, by authorities during his time in service, nothing illegal can't be
proven. It is also not illegal to switch the position from the watchdog into the industry overnight.
But it also
blatantly obvious to anyone these contacts did not emerge overnight, but the job opportunity at the industry was decided while working as regulatory watchdog,
very likely with some illegal bribing going on: give us some advantage, and we'll give you a well-paying, easy job.
Hence, it's an indicator, a red flag.
Similarly, many have suspected Pottering's contribution to linux being a purposed sabotage. They have been treated like tinfoil hats, but now as you see the same obvious red flag, an indicator that there
was economical and/or political
motivation and
possibility for such sabotage after all, it suddenly seems completely within imagination, even with no tinfoil hat on. Still, we don't know. But it's a real possibility, and I have stopped making fun of people who think that way.