Electronics > Projects, Designs, and Technical Stuff
Battery pack with switches? Can it be done?
(1/2) > >>
mrburnzie:
Hi everyone!

I'm working on a project, where my electronics run off of 4.2V Li-ion batteries. The electronics are a couple of IC's and a 12V motor.

The IC's are powered by an LDO that drops the 4.2V to 3.3V, and the 12V is run by boosting the voltage from 4.2V to 12V.
My problem is that the efficiency isn't great when we look at the boost IC.

The reason I have a 4.2V battery pack (1S3P) is because I have a small solar panel that slowly charges the battery pack.

To solve the efficiency problem, I have come up with an idea of switching the wiring of the battery pack. Let me explain:



This is the wiring I have come up with (but for 1S2P it would be the same for 3P,4P ect).



This would be the wiring when I need 4.2V to power the electronics (which are in sleep mode) and the batteries are charging. 


This would be the wiring, when I switch off SW1 and SW3. The idea is that the electronics would be powered still off-of the first 4.2V battery, and the motor would be connected to the new 8.4V (or in 3S 12.6V) source.

Of course the switching order is crucial, so we don't short the batteries.

Is this a good solution, or should I go with the old solution (boosting the voltage for the motor)  :-/O ?

The motor would draw around 2A-3A.

Edit: the motor would be on for max 10s and would be switched over to the second image. So the 8.4V/12.6V source would be avaiable for only 10s.

Siwastaja:
No, next to impossible to get this work sanely.

Improve the boost efficiency by redesigning (use synchronous topology), or go for fixed 3s, and buck it down if you have some parts that require lower voltage than the motor. If the 3V3 consumption is low enough, even direct LDO from the raw 3s voltage might be just fine.
mikerj:
There is a good reason no-one does this, as Siwastaja says it's very difficult to make this work reliably.  With a mechanical switch you have to solve the contact timing problem, get it wrong and you'll likely weld the switch contacts together and catch the thing on fire.  Then you need to find a way to prevent plugging your 4.2v charger in when the switch is set to 3S mode...
mrburnzie:
okay, let's say that the switches are mosfets controlled by an MCU. The charger would be also connected through a mosfet, so we turn it off when it goes into 3s mode. What would the problem be then? (besides it being unreliable)
Siwastaja:
The cells would be hard to guarantee staying in balance, so separate voltage monitoring for each series cell (a full blown cell-level BMS, that is) would be necessary.

Then, do you know what happens when you connect two cells with different voltages in parallel? They blow up. So you need an active DC/DC equalizer which automatically transfers charge between cells before they can be hard-connected in parallel. This equalization would take minutes, so very slow switching. The end result is expensive as a space station and provides absolutely no benefit over any simple solution.

You actually can pull it off as you describe, but without many expensive and complex safety systems it's bound to fail catastrophically one day. Even if you were willing to take the risk, why bother? I totally fail to see any benefit it offers over a simple one-battery system. Voltage conversion is cheap and efficient today.

For example, instead of putting many protected, current-limited smart MOSFET switches, change your current boost converter to a higher current synchronous type and you're done.
Navigation
Message Index
Next page
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...

Go to full version
Powered by SMFPacks Advanced Attachments Uploader Mod