Author Topic: Strange results measuring beta  (Read 7261 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline PCB.Wiz

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2072
  • Country: au
Re: Strange results measuring beta--new version of my beta tester
« Reply #125 on: December 18, 2024, 02:15:18 am »
It took me a while to solve the puzzle of how to supply both NPN and PNP base current without some complicated switching scheme.

A current regulator also makes this less supply dependent.

You can do it with a single current regulator, by just switching the current path, if you do not mind moving the meter.

It can be useful to also bring out the BASE terminal, to allow you to also measure VBE, as often that is of more interest when matching.
That also allow you to measure diodes, LEDs and Zeners at 10uA test ( 50uA zeners are becoming more common these days)
« Last Edit: December 18, 2024, 02:18:57 am by PCB.Wiz »
 

Offline Analog KidTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 895
  • Country: us
Re: Strange results measuring beta--new version of my beta tester
« Reply #126 on: December 18, 2024, 02:21:00 am »
It took me a while to solve the puzzle of how to supply both NPN and PNP base current without some complicated switching scheme.
You can do it with a single current regulator, by just switching the current path, if you do not mind moving the meter.

Yes, but I was trying to avoid that.
I figured out that I could eliminate the switch by using a different socket for PNP & NPN transistors, but I'd still need a switch, since the current-sense resistor needs to go to the collector (I'm measuring IC instead of IE). So this way worked the best.

Quote
It can be useful to also bring out the BASE terminal, to allow you to also measure VBE, as often that is of more interest when matching.
That also allow you to measure diodes, LEDs and Zeners at 10uA test ( 50uA zeners are becoming more common these days)

I'm going to be building a more complex test rig that does measure VBE as well, as part of my continuing exploration into the fascinating world of the transistor.
 

Offline PCB.Wiz

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2072
  • Country: au
Re: Strange results measuring beta
« Reply #127 on: December 18, 2024, 02:29:15 am »
I see the LM334 has a slight temperature variance.
TI give a circuit that reduces that, at the cost of 1 diode drop added.
 

Offline Analog KidTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 895
  • Country: us
Re: Strange results measuring beta
« Reply #128 on: December 18, 2024, 02:42:12 am »
You must mean this, yes? (from Nat'l Semicircular*)



* Someone I knew who worked at National used to call it that.
 

Online TimFox

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8905
  • Country: us
  • Retired, now restoring antique test equipment
Re: Strange results measuring beta
« Reply #129 on: December 18, 2024, 03:45:28 am »
Note that that ap note uses a 1N457 diode, which is quite different from a more popular 1N4148.
Pease had a discussion somewhere about the choice.
 

Offline David Hess

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 17375
  • Country: us
  • DavidH
Re: Strange results measuring beta
« Reply #130 on: December 19, 2024, 12:28:55 am »
Note that that ap note uses a 1N457 diode, which is quite different from a more popular 1N4148.
Pease had a discussion somewhere about the choice.

The significance of the 1N457 is that it is not gold doped, unlike the 1N4148.  A high conductance low leakage diode is called for here, with modern examples being the 1N458 (still available) and FDH300ATR.  A small signal transistor base-emitter or base-collector junction would also work well.
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf