| Electronics > Projects, Designs, and Technical Stuff |
| Codewarrior V4.7 can no longer load projects |
| (1/4) > >> |
| AndersJ:
Suddenly after a long period of perfect operation Codewarrior fails to read the cpu bean from the project file(s). This happened today, the first day after the holidays. I get the same problem on ”other” computers as well. I have tried various older generations taken from backups. Therefore I do not believe I have corrupted files. Could there be a date related issue with licensing, CW, Windows or something else? What may cause this error message: ”Error during loading beans ”bean-name” from project file. Attempting to open the non initialized bean, I get: ”Internal error: CPU database initialization failed (previous initilization attempt failed)” What may trigger these error messages? Everything has worked flawlessly for over 10 years. Now all of a sudden this happens. What has changed? - Year changed from 2019 to 2020? - Windows update? Suggestions are extremely welcome... |
| RoGeorge:
I don't know, it might be something JavaBeans related. To check if it's related with the date/time, I would try first to change the clock of a computer back to 2019. |
| Tomorokoshi:
I just ran my CodeWarrior 5.7 with ColdFire 6.4 and it compiled fine. FlexLM network license. Check the license manager. There may be some information in the "license.dat" file. |
| AndersJ:
--- Quote ---To check if it's related with the date/time, I would try first to change the clock of a computer back to 2019. --- End quote --- I tried that, but CW detects it, and refuses to start. NXP support calls it ”fraud detection”. I have asked how that can be disabled. Remains to be seen if they will reveal the secret. |
| AndersJ:
--- Quote from: Tomorokoshi on January 07, 2020, 08:15:27 pm ---I just ran my CodeWarrior 5.7 with ColdFire 6.4 and it compiled fine. FlexLM network license. Check the license manager. There may be some information in the "license.dat" file. --- End quote --- I see no irregularities in the license file. Nothing stands out compared to the file from CW V6.3 that still works fine. On the other hand I do not know how to interpret the file syntax. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |