Electronics > Projects, Designs, and Technical Stuff

Common diodes frequency?

<< < (2/2)

SiliconWizard:
One of the typical germanium diodes you could still find (but not everywhere) is the 1N34. Its specs are unimpressive (Vfd, reverse leakage current...), but it has a junction capacitance < 1pF, whereas the diode you posted has a typical 17pF.

In an old analog meter in AC, which I kind of doubt was designed for high-frequency anyway, it's not likely to matter one bit IMO. (But we'd have to know more about this meter though.)

capt bullshot:

--- Quote from: 001 on October 24, 2019, 01:59:46 pm ---
--- Quote from: capt bullshot on October 24, 2019, 01:52:27 pm ---
The UF400x is of the fast rectifier kind, not really suitable as an (power) line rectifier (that would be the 1N400x)

--- End quote ---

Some people "upgrade" 1N400x with UF400x and caps across it. Why?  :-//

--- End quote ---

As long as the peak current doesn't exceed the rating, one can use the UF400x as an line frequency rectifier. Upgrading and paralleling a cap reduces active and passive EMI in certain cases, there's some interesting reading about the purpose of the capacitors in parallel to the diodes (no matter if UF or 1N kind), especially interesting if you're dealing with HF in your lab or if you're a HAM radio operator. Can't provide a link, just remember having read about that, not where.

SiliconWizard:

--- Quote from: 001 on October 24, 2019, 01:59:46 pm ---
--- Quote from: capt bullshot on October 24, 2019, 01:52:27 pm ---
The UF400x is of the fast rectifier kind, not really suitable as an (power) line rectifier (that would be the 1N400x)

--- End quote ---

Some people "upgrade" 1N400x with UF400x and caps across it. Why?  :-//

--- End quote ---

Don't know. The UF series have a much lower typical reverse recovery time than their 1N counterparts. But paralleling a cap would kind of defeat that? You should tell us the context.
A typical use of paralleling caps with diodes is in bridge rectifiers to reduce noise. The whole point would NOT be to improve the performance at high frequency (kind of the opposite).

I don't really see a big difference between UF and 1N expect the recovery time, and I'm not sure it would really make a difference in the above case, so I don't really see the "upgrade" factor here.

Kleinstein:
The junction capacitance and reverse recovery time are 2 properties not directly related. The capacitance depends on the size and doping levels. The reverse recovery time depends on the minority carrier lifetime - fast recovery usually comes with a higher leakage current, as a small life time also increases leakage.
The cheap, slow rectifier diodes may not be tested for low leakage, but the typical leakage tends to be lower than with comparable size  fast diodes. Fast diodes may have a smaller die and thus lower peak current.

For the rectifier at a meter, it depends on the use: for protection (e.g. in parallel to the meter movement) the UF400x or 1N400x should be OK. For a rectifier to measure AC one would better use germanium or Schottky diodes because of the low forward voltage.

Cliff Matthews:
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/beginners/why-would-someone-use-10nf-capacitors-in-parallel-with-each-diode-of-a-fwr/

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page

There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
Go to full version
Powered by SMFPacks Advanced Attachments Uploader Mod