Author Topic: Connector sparking and damage due to inrush at "mating" time?  (Read 7356 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline zenerbjtTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • !
  • Posts: 69
  • Country: gb
Connector sparking and damage due to inrush at "mating" time?
« on: August 30, 2020, 09:46:55 pm »
Dear Engineers,

We are using the JST connector of Part number = S2B-XH-A. We are using it to connect our 48V battery to our 5Vout DCDC module. (as attached)
This comprises an 82uF capacitor at its input. Considering the inrush and sparking at the connector contacts due to the 82uF input capacitor, how long do you think this connector will last?
Say, after 10000 connections, what would then be the resistance of this connector?
Circuit attached showing where connector is.

It will be  connected once per day. Every day.

S2B-XH-A connector
https://docs.rs-online.com/f25e/0900766b81357f2f.pdf
« Last Edit: August 30, 2020, 09:50:10 pm by zenerbjt »
 

Offline NiHaoMike

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 9323
  • Country: us
  • "Don't turn it on - Take it apart!"
    • Facebook Page
Re: Connector sparking and damage due to inrush at "mating" time?
« Reply #1 on: August 30, 2020, 10:00:17 pm »
Add a small resistor or NTC in series to reduce the inrush. Since your load is small, the additional losses will be minimal.
Cryptocurrency has taught me to love math and at the same time be baffled by it.

Cryptocurrency lesson 0: Altcoins and Bitcoin are not the same thing.
 
The following users thanked this post: zenerbjt

Offline wizard69

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1184
  • Country: us
Re: Connector sparking and damage due to inrush at "mating" time?
« Reply #2 on: August 31, 2020, 12:18:51 am »
Silly question but why are you plugging in while powered up.   That seems like asking for trouble on a JST style connector.   You might not get a off by one error due to the shroud but those types of connectors tend to get rocked into place.    Plus you are exposing whomever is plugging in, to voltages over 24 VDC.   That might be a regulatory problem, I just know I've had a enough wire to board connectors, fail to retain the insert contact that I wouldn't like it.

Dear Engineers,

We are using the JST connector of Part number = S2B-XH-A. We are using it to connect our 48V battery to our 5Vout DCDC module. (as attached)
This comprises an 82uF capacitor at its input. Considering the inrush and sparking at the connector contacts due to the 82uF input capacitor, how long do you think this connector will last?
Say, after 10000 connections, what would then be the resistance of this connector?
Circuit attached showing where connector is.   

It will be  connected once per day. Every day.

S2B-XH-A connector
https://docs.rs-online.com/f25e/0900766b81357f2f.pdf
 
The following users thanked this post: zenerbjt

Offline Psi

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 10386
  • Country: nz
Re: Connector sparking and damage due to inrush at "mating" time?
« Reply #3 on: August 31, 2020, 12:23:38 am »
yeah, JST really aren't designed for hot plugging power, or hot plugging in general.

You could add a mosfet + and RC filter on its gate.
Have the mosfet pass through power after a delay from the connector insert. That way the inrush happens once the connector is fully seated not when a tiny area of the conductors first touch.
« Last Edit: August 31, 2020, 12:29:01 am by Psi »
Greek letter 'Psi' (not Pounds per Square Inch)
 
The following users thanked this post: zenerbjt

Offline temperance

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 687
  • Country: 00
Re: Connector sparking and damage due to inrush at "mating" time?
« Reply #4 on: August 31, 2020, 12:30:57 am »
Just to convince you that a some form of inrush current limiting will be required. The connector is not the only problem.

For aluminium electrolytic and film type capacitors: the pin to foil connection will fail.
For ceramic capacitors: because of electrostriction they will crack and cause a short and burn out your board before the fuse melts.
 
The following users thanked this post: zenerbjt

Offline wraper

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 17952
  • Country: lv
Re: Connector sparking and damage due to inrush at "mating" time?
« Reply #5 on: August 31, 2020, 12:33:19 am »
Say, after 10000 connections, what would then be the resistance of this connector?
Good luck with 10k mating cycles. These connectors are not really designed for large amount of mating cycles. If they survive 500 without significant wear even without any inrush, you will be lucky.
 
The following users thanked this post: brabus, zenerbjt

Offline oPossum

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1472
  • Country: us
  • Very dangerous - may attack at any time
Re: Connector sparking and damage due to inrush at "mating" time?
« Reply #6 on: August 31, 2020, 12:43:51 am »
You could try some 'spark resistant' XT-60 or XT-90 connectors. They have an integrated precharge resistor.

Like these: https://lunacycle.com/xt90-spark-resistant-connector-set/
 
The following users thanked this post: zenerbjt

Offline temperance

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 687
  • Country: 00
Re: Connector sparking and damage due to inrush at "mating" time?
« Reply #7 on: August 31, 2020, 12:47:00 am »
Indeed, most low cost connectors are rated for 20 mating cycles. FCI has some miniature connectors able to survive 1000 cycles...

What are you trying to do? Because someone plugging in those low cost connectors seems like a very unusual thing.
 
The following users thanked this post: zenerbjt

Offline zenerbjtTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • !
  • Posts: 69
  • Country: gb
Re: Connector sparking and damage due to inrush at "mating" time?
« Reply #8 on: August 31, 2020, 09:07:25 am »
Quote
Silly question but why are you plugging in while powered up.
Thanks but sorry i dont understand...we have a 48V battery which we plug into a circuit to power it, this circuit has an 82uF input capacitor, so we get inrush from the battery, through the JST  connector.

The JST connector has nothing in the datasheet which allows us to absolutely proove that the connector will be damaged by connecting it every day....so we wont get permission to re-do the circuit, as it will mean a PCB re-spin and will cost money.
 

Offline capt bullshot

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3033
  • Country: de
    • Mostly useless stuff, but nice to have: wunderkis.de
Re: Connector sparking and damage due to inrush at "mating" time?
« Reply #9 on: August 31, 2020, 10:45:40 am »
Quote
Silly question but why are you plugging in while powered up.
Thanks but sorry i dont understand...we have a 48V battery which we plug into a circuit to power it, this circuit has an 82uF input capacitor, so we get inrush from the battery, through the JST  connector.

The JST connector has nothing in the datasheet which allows us to absolutely proove that the connector will be damaged by connecting it every day....so we wont get permission to re-do the circuit, as it will mean a PCB re-spin and will cost money.

Never mind. It'll fail later at higher cost, most probably at someone else's expense / cost center.
Safety devices hinder evolution
 
The following users thanked this post: zenerbjt

Online tggzzz

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 21231
  • Country: gb
  • Numbers, not adjectives
    • Having fun doing more, with less
Re: Connector sparking and damage due to inrush at "mating" time?
« Reply #10 on: August 31, 2020, 10:55:14 am »
The JST connector has nothing in the datasheet which allows us to absolutely proove that the connector will be damaged by connecting it every day....so we wont get permission to re-do the circuit, as it will mean a PCB re-spin and will cost money.

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

I'll bet there is nothing in the data sheet that will "enable you to absolutely prove the connector will be damaged by" storage in H2SO4 or being hit with a shoe or...
There are lies, damned lies, statistics - and ADC/DAC specs.
Glider pilot's aphorism: "there is no substitute for span". Retort: "There is a substitute: skill+imagination. But you can buy span".
Having fun doing more, with less
 
The following users thanked this post: zenerbjt

Offline zenerbjtTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • !
  • Posts: 69
  • Country: gb
Re: Connector sparking and damage due to inrush at "mating" time?
« Reply #11 on: August 31, 2020, 11:43:46 am »
Thanks but relays have switching operation data (eg "10,000  operations") , so i am surprised that connectors dont have it.
 

Offline Jeroen3

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4209
  • Country: nl
  • Embedded Engineer
    • jeroen3.nl
Re: Connector sparking and damage due to inrush at "mating" time?
« Reply #12 on: August 31, 2020, 12:03:29 pm »
Did you request the manuals from JST webpage? They are behind a license agreement.

http://www.jst-mfg.com/product/detail_e.php?series=277

Either way, the point of discussion here is not the electrical life., but mechanical. I don't think they are non rated for live plugging in any case. They are just an easier way to deal with what otherwise would have been solderjoints of screw terminals.
I think that before you reach 100 mating cycles you'll have loose wires.
 
The following users thanked this post: tooki, zenerbjt

Offline ConKbot

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1400
Re: Connector sparking and damage due to inrush at "mating" time?
« Reply #13 on: August 31, 2020, 12:07:05 pm »
JST connectors like that are for cheap consumer appliances ("white goods")  So so they are meant to be plugged in once and left. I wouldn't be surprised if the rated cycle life was 20 cycles. (Edit: Molex picoblade is 30 cycles for comparison to something in a similar market segment)

I certainly wouldn't consider them for a 10k cycle application. Even if the contacts were ok, the wires would fatigue and snap off the back of the connector first.

Either add a soft start so its not popping every time its plugged in, pick a new connector with a long wipe what will have self cleaning action and some meat on the contacts, or both.

« Last Edit: August 31, 2020, 12:12:15 pm by ConKbot »
 
The following users thanked this post: BrianHG, zenerbjt

Offline langwadt

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4857
  • Country: dk
Re: Connector sparking and damage due to inrush at "mating" time?
« Reply #14 on: August 31, 2020, 12:09:58 pm »
Thanks but relays have switching operation data (eg "10,000  operations") , so i am surprised that connectors dont have it.

the connectors that are meant to be plugged and unplugged have it, e.g.  standard USB is rated for 1500 cycles and that is with a maximum capacity on 5V of 10uF
 
The following users thanked this post: zenerbjt

Offline Nusa

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2418
  • Country: us
Re: Connector sparking and damage due to inrush at "mating" time?
« Reply #15 on: August 31, 2020, 01:02:44 pm »
Any connector rated for 10K or more connections will have it in the datasheet, as well as prominently in their description, since it will be a strong selling point.

Ditto if it's designed for hot-plugging. Also a selling point.

Datasheets that don't mention it at all are probably rated in the 10s or 100s, depending on the material used for contacts and style of connector. If you are set on XH connectors, contact JST and ask them flat out. Whatever the numbers, special-ordering gold-plated contacts will get you the highest number on the list.
 
The following users thanked this post: zenerbjt

Offline Tomorokoshi

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1212
  • Country: us
Re: Connector sparking and damage due to inrush at "mating" time?
« Reply #16 on: August 31, 2020, 01:16:21 pm »
As a comparison look at a mid-range connector from Phoenix:

https://www.digikey.com/products/en?keywords=277-16346-ND

It's rated to 25 cycles. Now, that doesn't mean it disintegrates on cycle 26. It means that the datasheet values should be applicable if the connector was used within the ratings of the datasheet. Note that with these connectors the stress is applied to the wire, not the connector housing.

As others pointed out various standards may apply. A quick look at 61010 finds some areas of concern. There isn't enough information about the design, product, and application to really dig into it here. Commercial? Industrial? Internal test fixture?

Topics to ignore your boss about who is trying to make it faster and cheaper:
- Batteries. Lots of safety issues regarding batteries, particularly high-current lithium types.
- Environment. 48V lands right in the middle of dry compared to wet location concerns in 61010. Could this be a wet location?
- Access. User access to conductive terminals and wires with thin insulation.
- Connectors. Terminal spacing, wire size, etc.
- Misuse. Foreseeable issues.
- Faults. Single and multiple faults. Wire breakage.
 
The following users thanked this post: zenerbjt

Offline mikeselectricstuff

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 14117
  • Country: gb
    • Mike's Electric Stuff
Re: Connector sparking and damage due to inrush at "mating" time?
« Reply #17 on: August 31, 2020, 01:50:04 pm »
Measure the peak current on connection - likely tens of amps, way over the connector's rating
Youtube channel:Taking wierd stuff apart. Very apart.
Mike's Electric Stuff: High voltage, vintage electronics etc.
Day Job: Mostly LEDs
 
The following users thanked this post: zenerbjt

Online tggzzz

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 21231
  • Country: gb
  • Numbers, not adjectives
    • Having fun doing more, with less
Re: Connector sparking and damage due to inrush at "mating" time?
« Reply #18 on: August 31, 2020, 02:06:54 pm »
Thanks but relays have switching operation data (eg "10,000  operations") , so i am surprised that connectors dont have it.

Some do. Others don't.

In a similar vein, some aircraft specify that spin recovery will take up to X rotations when loaded within the limits. All the aircraft I've piloted do have such a specification, but Boeing 7x7 and Airbus 3xx don't.

Now why do you think that might be?
There are lies, damned lies, statistics - and ADC/DAC specs.
Glider pilot's aphorism: "there is no substitute for span". Retort: "There is a substitute: skill+imagination. But you can buy span".
Having fun doing more, with less
 
The following users thanked this post: zenerbjt

Offline bdunham7

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8178
  • Country: us
Re: Connector sparking and damage due to inrush at "mating" time?
« Reply #19 on: August 31, 2020, 02:16:19 pm »
Treez, is that you?  :-DD

JST connector and 10K mating cycles?  The same JST connectors that I carefully pry out with two plastic picks when I have to repair something and hope I don't hurt them?  Yes, they are commonly used for battery packs and the like, but the housings just aren't going to hold up to your long-term expectations.   

The amount of energy that it takes to charge up an 82uF cap is pretty small, even at 48VDC.  I doubt your JST life is going to be determined by how long it takes to arc the contacts down to a nub.  Just make sure that either the connector is accessible and repairable or that your product is disposable.  Or, you can just blame the inevitable problems on user abuse.
A 3.5 digit 4.5 digit 5 digit 5.5 digit 6.5 digit 7.5 digit DMM is good enough for most people.
 
The following users thanked this post: tooki, zenerbjt

Offline Gyro

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 10175
  • Country: gb
Best Regards, Chris
 
The following users thanked this post: zenerbjt

Online tggzzz

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 21231
  • Country: gb
  • Numbers, not adjectives
    • Having fun doing more, with less
Re: Connector sparking and damage due to inrush at "mating" time?
« Reply #21 on: August 31, 2020, 05:43:24 pm »
Of course it's treez, who else thanks every post regardless.  :-DD

Shush! He could easily change that characteristic tell-tale, thus making identification a little less trivial and obvious.

The evidence is that he can't change his posting style and content, though. :)
There are lies, damned lies, statistics - and ADC/DAC specs.
Glider pilot's aphorism: "there is no substitute for span". Retort: "There is a substitute: skill+imagination. But you can buy span".
Having fun doing more, with less
 
The following users thanked this post: Gyro, zenerbjt

Online silverback

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 27
  • Country: gb
Re: Connector sparking and damage due to inrush at "mating" time?
« Reply #22 on: August 31, 2020, 05:56:26 pm »
what about the poor old capacitor surge current
 
The following users thanked this post: zenerbjt

Offline jbb

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1265
  • Country: nz
Re: Connector sparking and damage due to inrush at "mating" time?
« Reply #23 on: August 31, 2020, 06:43:06 pm »
Sounds like your management subscribes to a time honoured management tradition: “We don’t have time to do it right but we do have time to do it twice.”

I suspect you won’t get near the lifetime you want, so I suggest you actually test it. Get yourself a fully charged battery and a board and cycle that sucker. Plug it in, unplug it, wait for 82uF cap to discharge, repeat (add a fair load to 5V output to discharge cap).

I suggest a pair of safety glasses in case it fails with sparks and some fine gloves so you don’t wear the skin off your fingertips.
 
The following users thanked this post: zenerbjt

Offline bson

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 2497
  • Country: us
Re: Connector sparking and damage due to inrush at "mating" time?
« Reply #24 on: August 31, 2020, 07:51:53 pm »
Add a small resistor or NTC in series to reduce the inrush. Since your load is small, the additional losses will be minimal.
In particular, put the NTC on the supply side of the connector to keep the voltage down and hence minimize arcing.
 
The following users thanked this post: zenerbjt


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf