Author Topic: Cyclone 4 board - 2 or 4 layers?  (Read 3810 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline BrianHG

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7733
  • Country: ca
Re: Cyclone 4 board - 2 or 4 layers?
« Reply #25 on: October 21, 2020, 12:19:01 am »
What do you know about Torex Semiconductor? I'm looking at these two regulators:

https://www.digikey.ca/en/products/detail/torex-semiconductor-ltd/XC6210B252MR-G/2138117
https://www.digikey.ca/en/products/detail/torex-semiconductor-ltd/XC6222B121MR-G/2138183
Their heatsink on their package can only dissipate a puny 250mw.  Do your current and voltage drop calculations to make sure they wont overheat.  Compare that to the the LM1117 you are currently using.
 

Offline MitiTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1324
  • Country: ca
Re: Cyclone 4 board - 2 or 4 layers?
« Reply #26 on: October 21, 2020, 12:44:15 am »
That's 312mA on 2.5V and 119mA on 1.2V from 3.3V. PCB mounted with a bit of copper around, I expect them to dissipate at least 350 - 400 mW.
Anyway, it may be a bit marginal since I don't know how the current is distributed between the voltage rails. Yeah, I know that Intel has a power estimator ...
Fear does not stop death, it stops life.
 

Offline BrianHG

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7733
  • Country: ca
Re: Cyclone 4 board - 2 or 4 layers?
« Reply #27 on: October 21, 2020, 01:07:27 am »
Play it safe....  You are placing this PCB inside another device.  You want clearance for heat coming from that device as well.

Also, the 2.5v should have very little current.  The 1.8v core probably has the higher current.  And, since 1.8v is further from your 5v source, it will generate more heat.

Also, if you look at TI's data sheet for the LM1117, it has copper GND layout recommendations for the GND heatsink pad with which levels of thermal conductivity you will receive.
« Last Edit: October 21, 2020, 01:09:34 am by BrianHG »
 

Offline langwadt

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4427
  • Country: dk
Re: Cyclone 4 board - 2 or 4 layers?
« Reply #28 on: October 21, 2020, 01:28:43 am »
Play it safe....  You are placing this PCB inside another device.  You want clearance for heat coming from that device as well.

Also, the 2.5v should have very little current.  The 1.8v core probably has the higher current.  And, since 1.8v is further from your 5v source, it will generate more heat.

Also, if you look at TI's data sheet for the LM1117, it has copper GND layout recommendations for the GND heatsink pad with which levels of thermal conductivity you will receive.

the LM1117 has Vout on the tap and is picky about what output cap you put on it
 

Offline Siwastaja

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8172
  • Country: fi
Re: Cyclone 4 board - 2 or 4 layers?
« Reply #29 on: October 21, 2020, 07:44:47 am »
Consider doing Vcore=1.2V with a switcher from 5V. My secret go-to sauce: SC189CSKTRT and MAMK2520T2R2M + 0603 or 0805 MLCCs, because I don't like generating heat. Not much more expensive or bigger than a linear solution.

Vpll = 2.5V should be very low current and good for linear reg from 5V or from 3V3, but do verify this from the datasheet.
 

Offline MitiTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1324
  • Country: ca
Re: Cyclone 4 board - 2 or 4 layers?
« Reply #30 on: October 21, 2020, 03:13:48 pm »
Yes, I think this is the best solution, I was contemplating it. Have you tried that inductor? Looks like the DC resistance is a bit higher than recommended in the IC data sheet.
Fear does not stop death, it stops life.
 

Offline Siwastaja

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8172
  • Country: fi
Re: Cyclone 4 board - 2 or 4 layers?
« Reply #31 on: October 21, 2020, 03:16:15 pm »
Yes, I think this is the best solution, I was contemplating it. Have you tried that inductor? Looks like the DC resistance is a bit higher than recommended in the IC data sheet.

Yes but not at full output current but some 500mA so heating is negligible. Of course, do your own loss calculation.
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf