Author Topic: Deliberate Lithium cell overcharging  (Read 7640 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Siwastaja

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 9327
  • Country: fi
Re: Deliberate Lithium cell overcharging
« Reply #25 on: May 12, 2019, 07:16:49 am »
Physical nail penetration might be the best, if it needs to demonstrate a typical cause.
Even then, you might not get a fire.

Indeed - often the manufacturers even document a nail penetration test, with a typical result of "no fire".

Nail penetration causes local internal short circuit, but if the shutdown separator works as intended, the ion transfer stops / is limited, limiting the temperature rise below the runaway onset temperature.

Smaller cells tend to perform better because they are more isothermal, with safety layers reacting better to the average cell events (think about the PTC cap of a 18650, and compare it to a massive prismatic cell.)

Note that it is dangerous to rely on all these cell-level protections; the risk is hugely increased when abusing cells, especially physically. However, the risk is still awkwardly small when your target is to demonstrate a battery fire.

To say it in other words with made-up but representative numbers, assume that a risk of li-ion fire, using high-quality cells, is, say, 1 failure per 10^6 packs. Now, overcharge the cells severely, and the risk might go up by 1000x, to 1 failure per 10^3 packs; a huge safety issue if you have epidemic BMS failures; but still low enough so it's almost impossible to demonstrate. I have seen so many overcharging events, and never a fire resulting. Have been lucky - or unlucky, depending on what you want to see.

Re: explosion, this is a classical case of there being two completely different meanings for the same word: the scientifically defined exact meaning, and the colloquial meaning. I wouldn't make a big fuss about it, people do and will always call almost anything an "explosion" if it feels like it to them, and this isn't wrong, just how language works.
« Last Edit: May 12, 2019, 07:22:40 am by Siwastaja »
 

Offline Zero999

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 20357
  • Country: gb
  • 0999
Re: Deliberate Lithium cell overcharging
« Reply #26 on: May 12, 2019, 07:48:35 am »
That was definitely not an explosion, there wasn't even a "big bang". If it was an explosion there would be a shockwave and shrapnel everywhere.
Whatever, perhaps you'll feel comfortable poking a lithium ion battery with a skewer, whist holding it in your hand.

It's good they way the myth about water and lithium ion batteries is busted in that video, as it doesn't burst into flames, when wetted.
 

Offline tszaboo

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8217
  • Country: nl
  • Current job: ATEX product design
Re: Deliberate Lithium cell overcharging
« Reply #27 on: May 12, 2019, 08:28:35 am »
There's no need to abuse the cells prior, lithium battery fires occur when cells are overcharged, or when they short circuit internally which is also what happens when they are overcharged. Worn out or abused packs tend to be more vulnerable because they can get out of balance but it's the overcharging that makes them burn.

That said, I don't really see what the point is here. The best way to fight a lithium battery fire is plain old fashioned water and lots of it. Take away the heat and the fire goes out.
Well, yes and no. Sand is probably the best to put out the fire on the short term, and let it burn on your term later.

"Lithium reacts intensely with water, forming lithium hydroxide and highly flammable hydrogen. The colourless solution is highly alkalic. The exothermal reactions lasts longer than the reaction of sodium and water, which is directly below lithium in the periodic chart.

2 Li(s) + 2 H2O -> 2 LiOH (aq) + H2(g)

At 750oC lithium reacts with hydrogen to lithium hydride (LiH). The white powder that forms releases hydrogen gas upon later reaction with water, in amounts of 2800 liter per kilogram hydride. As such, lithium can be applied as hydrogen storage."
So once the cell is damaged, it might catch on fire days after it has been put out, just because lithium reacting with water. Besides it emitting H2, which might explode, it could emit Hydrogen fluoride, which is poison.
 

Offline Siwastaja

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 9327
  • Country: fi
Re: Deliberate Lithium cell overcharging
« Reply #28 on: May 12, 2019, 08:40:42 am »
"Lithium reacts intensely with water, forming lithium hydroxide and highly flammable hydrogen. The colourless solution is highly alkalic. The exothermal reactions lasts longer than the reaction of sodium and water, which is directly below lithium in the periodic chart.

2 Li(s) + 2 H2O -> 2 LiOH (aq) + H2(g)

At 750oC lithium reacts with hydrogen to lithium hydride (LiH). The white powder that forms releases hydrogen gas upon later reaction with water, in amounts of 2800 liter per kilogram hydride. As such, lithium can be applied as hydrogen storage."
So once the cell is damaged, it might catch on fire days after it has been put out, just because lithium reacting with water. Besides it emitting H2, which might explode, it could emit Hydrogen fluoride, which is poison.

Your point is quite moot, as there is no (or very little) metal lithium in a lithium ion cell, in a similar way that there is no metal sodium in your table salt: they react similarly with water: nothing happens.

Similarly, chlorine gas is extremely poisonous, yet NaCl doesn't easily decompose into it.

Chemistry can be unintuitive for a layperson: seeing the same atom as in a well-known poison or dangerous substance doesn't necessarily mean anything (think about H2O, or many CN (cyanide) containing safe substances for example).

But for the exact same reason Li or Na is so freaking reactive, it's also extremely unreactive going back to the opposite direction. In a li-ion cell, it's in the "reacted" or unreactive form, the same as Na is in your table salt. In metal lithium primary cell, it's in the reactive metal form.

Although, there might be some corner cases where a long-time abused cell has developed small amounts of lithium metal (see: lithium plating, for example, during overcharge), which, even if, due to the minuscule amount, doesn't produce much energy when reacting with water, could, in certain conditions,  trigger another reaction. But I don't think this is very relevant in the big picture - the damaged cells are dangerous as long as there is significant stored chemical energy left in them, and the actual trigger can be anything. It's probably a false assumption that lithium-water reaction has anything to do with it.

Feel free to store burned cells in sand after the initial fire has been taken care of with a lot of water, and the battery has been dismantled - probably a good idea. Sand is easy to obtain in large quantities, and provides good combination of thermal insulation and thermal capacity, withstanding high temperatures. During an incident, getting sand inside and around a pack is probably much more difficult and destructive to the surroundings, compared to simply pumping some water through a hose.
« Last Edit: May 12, 2019, 08:55:20 am by Siwastaja »
 

Offline beanflying

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7375
  • Country: au
  • Toys so very many Toys.
Re: Deliberate Lithium cell overcharging
« Reply #29 on: May 12, 2019, 08:55:08 am »
There is one obvious suspect local (very suspect  ;) ) who would love to help you build a device to overcharge some Lithium Batteries. I am sure Clive would be up for a build in some form and some video of it in use for your training.

http://www.bigclive.com/

https://www.youtube.com/user/bigclivedotcom/search?query=lithium
Coffee, Food, R/C and electronics nerd in no particular order. Also CNC wannabe, 3D printer and Laser Cutter Junkie and just don't mention my TEA addiction....
 
The following users thanked this post: stj, ThinkingGrenade

Offline ogden

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3731
  • Country: lv
Re: Deliberate Lithium cell overcharging
« Reply #30 on: May 12, 2019, 08:55:12 am »
Your point is quite moot, as there is no metal lithium in a lithium ion cell, in a similar way that there is no metal sodium in your table salt: they react similarly with water: nothing happens.

Similarly, chlorine gas is extremely poisonous, yet NaCl doesn't easily decompose into it.

Chemistry can be unintuitive for a layperson. But for the exact same reason Li or Na is so freaking reactive, it's also extremely unreactive going back to the opposite direction. In a li-ion cell, it's in the "reacted" or unreactive form, the same as in your table salt. In metal lithium primary cell, it's in the reactive metal form.

Well, well... If contents of Li-Ion battery is so "unreactive" with water, then how you explain following video?

https://youtu.be/cTJh_bzI0QQ?t=483
 

Offline Siwastaja

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 9327
  • Country: fi
Re: Deliberate Lithium cell overcharging
« Reply #31 on: May 12, 2019, 08:56:50 am »
Well, well... If contents of Li-Ion battery is so "unreactive" with water, then how you explain following video?

https://youtu.be/cTJh_bzI0QQ?t=483

The answer is in the title: it's a lithium (nonchargeable, primary) battery, which has absolutely nothing to do with lithium ion battery (secondary, chargeable cell).

Primary lithium cells contain lithium (metal), which burns when reacting with water, as seen in the video. Li-ion cells do not normally contain meaningful amounts of lithium metal.

Primary lithium cells are typically very small, and indeed non-rechargeable, typically used to power real-time clocks, etc, or small gadgets, smoke detectors, remote controls, etc., as alternatives for traditional alkaline cells.

Rechargeable packs are always li-ion, so in practice it should be easy to know which one you are facing. Li-ion is also getting really ubiquitous really fast, with an almost alarming growth rate, so, even though the safety is getting better, we are bound to see some li-ion fires, and hence need to understand the right fire-fighting strategy, which is using a lot of water, for a long time, to cool the battery pack internally. Firefighters are being educated and probably mostly know this, but it doesn't hurt to know for laymen, either.

The "lithium burns if you fight li-ion fire with water" myth is extremely dangerous and really needs to die, finally.

Now, I do see that people colloquially talk about "lithium batteries" when talking about li-ion packs. In this case, you need to guess what they mean. If they are talking about a rechargeable pack, or a large battery, there's not much choice here, it's li-ion. You can try to correct them, but people will continue talking about "lithium batteries" - including many official documents as well.

Finally, as a terminology reminder, LiPo or "lithium polymer" is exact same thing as lithium ion, just an alternative marketing term typically used for pouch form factor li-ion cells. I feel this is an important addition here as the words "lithium polymer" omit the word "ion", possibly misleadingly. (I have seen people think that LiPo cells are rechargeable metal lithium batteries, which of course isn't true.)
« Last Edit: May 12, 2019, 09:28:47 am by Siwastaja »
 
The following users thanked this post: Yansi, ogden

Offline tszaboo

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8217
  • Country: nl
  • Current job: ATEX product design
Re: Deliberate Lithium cell overcharging
« Reply #32 on: May 12, 2019, 10:33:02 am »
Well, well... If contents of Li-Ion battery is so "unreactive" with water, then how you explain following video?

https://youtu.be/cTJh_bzI0QQ?t=483

The answer is in the title: it's a lithium (nonchargeable, primary) battery, which has absolutely nothing to do with lithium ion battery (secondary, chargeable cell).

Primary lithium cells contain lithium (metal), which burns when reacting with water, as seen in the video. Li-ion cells do not normally contain meaningful amounts of lithium metal.

Primary lithium cells are typically very small, and indeed non-rechargeable, typically used to power real-time clocks, etc, or small gadgets, smoke detectors, remote controls, etc., as alternatives for traditional alkaline cells.

Rechargeable packs are always li-ion, so in practice it should be easy to know which one you are facing. Li-ion is also getting really ubiquitous really fast, with an almost alarming growth rate, so, even though the safety is getting better, we are bound to see some li-ion fires, and hence need to understand the right fire-fighting strategy, which is using a lot of water, for a long time, to cool the battery pack internally. Firefighters are being educated and probably mostly know this, but it doesn't hurt to know for laymen, either.

The "lithium burns if you fight li-ion fire with water" myth is extremely dangerous and really needs to die, finally.

Now, I do see that people colloquially talk about "lithium batteries" when talking about li-ion packs. In this case, you need to guess what they mean. If they are talking about a rechargeable pack, or a large battery, there's not much choice here, it's li-ion. You can try to correct them, but people will continue talking about "lithium batteries" - including many official documents as well.

Finally, as a terminology reminder, LiPo or "lithium polymer" is exact same thing as lithium ion, just an alternative marketing term typically used for pouch form factor li-ion cells. I feel this is an important addition here as the words "lithium polymer" omit the word "ion", possibly misleadingly. (I have seen people think that LiPo cells are rechargeable metal lithium batteries, which of course isn't true.)
Except it is not a myth. There were several electric cars on fire, and the firefighters used water to extinguish it, only to have it on fire again later. I dont know what is wrong with you, going against facts, just because you think that reality doesn't work that way.
https://piximus.net/vehicles/this-how-dutch-firefighters-put-out-the-fire-of-bmw-i8
"The fire department and BMW employees were able to move the vehicle outside, where normal techniques failed to extinguish the battery pack, which they found difficult to reach,"
https://www.total-croatia-news.com/made-in-croatia/23852-the-grand-tour-season-two-episode-one-is-out-and-rimac-concept-one-is-on-flames
"May told us the story of how Rimac Concept_One kept catching fire for 5 days after the crash"
https://www.theverge.com/2018/6/26/17507254/tesla-crash-battery-fire-florida-ntsb
"They extinguished it using as much as 300 gallons of water and foam."
"As the car was being loaded for removal from the scene, the battery reignited and was quickly extinguished."

So yeah, they tried water, lots of water, and it doesnt work, probably it made everything worse.
 

Offline beanflying

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7375
  • Country: au
  • Toys so very many Toys.
Re: Deliberate Lithium cell overcharging
« Reply #33 on: May 12, 2019, 10:52:29 am »
As someone who has crashed and seen crashed a lot of Lithium powered aircraft and helis it is actually very difficult to get one to combust and get to flames. The more normal mode post impact is smoke, heat and puffing of the packs and not flame.

Post impact risk minimisation is as important as the threat remains after impact of those damaged cells. Having some method to reduce heat in a damaged pack is as important as anything to prevent a fire.
Coffee, Food, R/C and electronics nerd in no particular order. Also CNC wannabe, 3D printer and Laser Cutter Junkie and just don't mention my TEA addiction....
 
The following users thanked this post: Siwastaja

Offline Marco

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7043
  • Country: nl
Re: Deliberate Lithium cell overcharging
« Reply #34 on: May 12, 2019, 11:06:21 am »
I wonder if electric cars are designed to let water easily penetrate all of the battery once a fire has started, they probably should.
« Last Edit: May 12, 2019, 11:33:50 am by Marco »
 

Offline Siwastaja

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 9327
  • Country: fi
Re: Deliberate Lithium cell overcharging
« Reply #35 on: May 12, 2019, 12:00:52 pm »
There were several electric cars on fire, and the firefighters used water to extinguish it, only to have it on fire again later. I dont know what is wrong with you, going against facts,...

You are mixing things up and making a wrong conclusion.

It's completely true that it's hard to permanently extinguish a large li-ion pack fire, and it's fully true they easily reignite, but the conclusion that it's because lithium metal is reacting with water, is the wrong one. Your conclusion that fighting them with water somehow caused them to reignite is false, as well. They reignite because they are damaged and store the latent chemical energy and an oxidizer.

It's just that water isn't capable of rendering the cells "safe" in one pass - this is true for all other ways to fight the fire as well. Your idea of burying the burned cells in sand is IMO a very good one, but in practice you would often need to fight the fire with water first, to prevent damage to surroundings. You'd be very lucky to have the fire happen in such controlled environment where you don't need to think about protecting the surroundings. And, stopping the pack fire is the most powerful way to protect the surroundings, you just need to understand it's still not safe after the fact.

It has nothing to do with lithium reacting with water. The actual reaction is the li-ion cathode intercalation breaking down: consider the most traditional LiCoO2 cathode. More modern NCA and NMC used in most EVs are similar. The issue is that the cathode itself supplies the oxygen, and the cathode stability is poor: it breaks down if enough Li is removed from the matrix due to overcharge, or if temperature exceeds the thermal runaway onset temperature, just around 160 degC for these cathode materials. (A bit more for LMO or LFP.) There is a lot of oxygen in this intercalation matrix, and thus a lot of potential chemical energy; this is the unstable component of the battery, not li metal, which doesn't exist there in large enough amounts to matter. Additionally, the flammable electrolyte (organic solvent such as a combination of ethylene carbonate and other similar substances) is not helping, and this is the typical source of shooting out flames you see.

The issue is, because the battery has its own source of oxygen (and worse: in a fairly unstable form), it's hard to extinguish: the traditional way of removing air supply (CO2, powder, foam, etc. extinguishers) doesn't help at all; the fuel is there as well; the only way is to actively remove heat. But because the thermal runaway temperature is low, it reignites pretty easily unless actively cooled for indefinite time. Especially because now the cells are physically damaged.

So, understanding the chemistry, it isn't surprising at all that the packs reignite; it's completely as expected. The firefighters need proper training to understand this: a pack doesn't become safe after it has been cooled down and the fire ceased. If this has come as a surprise for any fire brigade, IMHO the EV industry has failed to do their job of arranging proper training for this new tech.

So, water indeed doesn't safely and fully conclude the case, you are right in that. Your problem is assuming that some other way would be better, or that water is adding to the problem.

Water is the only practical way to quickly control the heat release during the incident (which is why it's the officially preferred method of fighting li-ion fire), but you absolutely must know how to do the aftermath. It's not a bad idea to let the cells burn in a controlled environment, that'll eventually release all the chemically stored energy. But, during a firefighting situation, this is often unacceptable - think about a on-board airplane fire as an extreme example. You need to transfer the pack to a safe place first. IMHO, EV manufacturers should take care of this safe aftermath business.

AFAIK, water does not do any such extra damage causing cells to become "more dangerous". It's just that, even water is unable to solve the problem in "one go".

If you look at the official firefighting recommendations, I recommend to look recent ones. The industry and the officials have reached the conclusion of recommending using a lot of water during the last decade or so. We are seeing an evolution here: first they recommended completely random things, not knowing about the chemistry (and li-ion fires were such rare occurences, and packs were small, so it didn't matter much). Then, they understood that you need to fight it with water; but the need for aftermath is still underestimated and poorly specified. I guess we'll see improvement there next.
« Last Edit: May 12, 2019, 12:29:58 pm by Siwastaja »
 
The following users thanked this post: nctnico

Offline nctnico

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 28429
  • Country: nl
    • NCT Developments
Re: Deliberate Lithium cell overcharging
« Reply #36 on: May 12, 2019, 12:41:25 pm »
I work for a company that provides fire equipment and i know how to make most things go boom, but im asking you guys, as my experience is limited with this kind of thing......
Heat, overcharge or short. The last two will require to disable the BMS (circuit board) and fuse of the battery pack.

The key to putting out a Li-ion pack which is on fire is to submerge it in water for a day so it can cool down completely. A fire in a battery pack is a chain reaction because the cells heat eachother and then ignite themselves heating up their neighbours. Dutch fire brigades are getting equiped with large (open) containers filled with water in which they can submerge electric vehicles. Needless to say the car is completely ruined (FUBAR) after that. Siwastaja is also involved in manufacturing Li-ion battery packs; he has given some good advice in his posts.
« Last Edit: May 12, 2019, 12:48:32 pm by nctnico »
There are small lies, big lies and then there is what is on the screen of your oscilloscope.
 

Offline 3roomlab

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 850
  • Country: 00
Re: Deliberate Lithium cell overcharging
« Reply #37 on: May 13, 2019, 06:42:54 am »
@ Siwastaja
in post #10, the pdf decribes experiments done to determine the specific heat and internal thermal resistance of a cell (thru the folded layers). If I am understanding the numbers correctly, shouldnt it be more dangerous to make larger battery cells? as the inner temperature rise cannot be dissipated as quickly as smaller (or flatter with more surface area) cells?
 

Offline beanflying

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7375
  • Country: au
  • Toys so very many Toys.
Re: Deliberate Lithium cell overcharging
« Reply #38 on: May 13, 2019, 06:53:51 am »
I the case of the OP it doesn't matter how the cells are made only how to manage them safely post impact or fire from X electrical failure causes. It would be a long way OT to get into Cell construction.

If they are burning put them out and remove any chance of them reigniting (most likely chemically neutralised post extinguishing) or keeping them managed so they never get to a combustion point and can be moved safely for likely chemical treatment.
Coffee, Food, R/C and electronics nerd in no particular order. Also CNC wannabe, 3D printer and Laser Cutter Junkie and just don't mention my TEA addiction....
 

Offline Siwastaja

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 9327
  • Country: fi
Re: Deliberate Lithium cell overcharging
« Reply #39 on: May 13, 2019, 07:04:03 am »
@ Siwastaja
in post #10, the pdf decribes experiments done to determine the specific heat and internal thermal resistance of a cell (thru the folded layers). If I am understanding the numbers correctly, shouldnt it be more dangerous to make larger battery cells? as the inner temperature rise cannot be dissipated as quickly as smaller (or flatter with more surface area) cells?

Yes, exactly. Actually I remember this being a marketing argument for Tesla's 18650 cell choice, back in the days they were still smaller and published more engineering argumentation for their technical decisions: a 18650 remains almost isothermal, and produces a large surface area to volume ratio, so that large packs can be actively forced to an even temperature, which will be good for both safety and even aging and little need for balancing.

Quote from: beanflying
remove any chance of them reigniting (most likely chemically neutralised post extinguishing)

I'm not aware of any such neutralizing agent capable of preventing reignition (remember the cells have the internal oxidizing source), maybe I have missed something, dare to share more details?


 
The following users thanked this post: 3roomlab

Offline beanflying

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7375
  • Country: au
  • Toys so very many Toys.
Re: Deliberate Lithium cell overcharging
« Reply #40 on: May 13, 2019, 07:35:28 am »
Section four in this PDF is fairly comprehensive http://hahana.soest.hawaii.edu/seagliders/manuals/electrochem_Battery_Safety.pdf An expanded version of this sort of treatment is where I was heading with my previous post. It will make sense if the pack is cool to remove any good and apparently undamaged cells ASAP just in case it goes to poo again.

The early remedy for R/C packs was to immerse them in a bucket of heavilly salted water then later pierce the foil bags of the pack :o This sort of option https://oscarliang.com/dispose-lipo-battery-safely/ Generally if the cells are temperature stable these days the plan is to fully discharge them and dispose appropriately in battery recycling options.

Dumping the heat still remains key to getting it under control initially and avoiding combustion if possible.
Coffee, Food, R/C and electronics nerd in no particular order. Also CNC wannabe, 3D printer and Laser Cutter Junkie and just don't mention my TEA addiction....
 

Offline Siwastaja

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 9327
  • Country: fi
Re: Deliberate Lithium cell overcharging
« Reply #41 on: May 13, 2019, 08:04:08 am »
Section four in this PDF is fairly comprehensive http://hahana.soest.hawaii.edu/seagliders/manuals/electrochem_Battery_Safety.pdf

Do note that they don't manufacture lithium ion cells, and while a lot of advice in this document is generic and usable, some specifics could be misleading (for example, instructions regarding lithium metal cells).
 

Offline beanflying

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7375
  • Country: au
  • Toys so very many Toys.
Re: Deliberate Lithium cell overcharging
« Reply #42 on: May 13, 2019, 08:09:32 am »
True about it being general, it was just a file I found that had a decent procedural method laid out and it is the sort of approach you need to take post impact or electrical event.

Give it a few more years of exploding Teslas it will be much better known how to manage and prevent large packs going up in smoke and if they do what to do and then what to do to clean up after.
Coffee, Food, R/C and electronics nerd in no particular order. Also CNC wannabe, 3D printer and Laser Cutter Junkie and just don't mention my TEA addiction....
 

Offline stj

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2195
  • Country: gb
Re: Deliberate Lithium cell overcharging
« Reply #43 on: May 13, 2019, 08:18:36 am »
i can imagine 18650's going bang pretty easily,
once they get hot enough the insulating washer at the top could melt/get bypassed causing a dead short - then the pressure has to overcome some pretty thick metal.

as for tesla etc,
put the packs on runners with electrically fired gas-rams on them like on some seatbelts/roll-bars.
if the pack gets too hot - eject the warp-core(pack) onto the road!!  >:D
 

Offline james_s

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 21611
  • Country: us
Re: Deliberate Lithium cell overcharging
« Reply #44 on: May 13, 2019, 03:56:03 pm »
Tasked with that I would use an aluminum partition. Aluminum is practically transparent to X-rays, especially at higher energies.
 
The following users thanked this post: 3roomlab

Offline Daixiwen

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 367
  • Country: no
Re: Deliberate Lithium cell overcharging
« Reply #45 on: May 14, 2019, 09:32:57 am »
I used to work at a lithium ion cell factory. It's not that easy to make 18650 to ignite when you want it. They have a circuit breaker that will isolate the positive electrode when the internal pressure increases.
It is easier to do with lithium polymer cells, that don't have that circuit breaker. Just overcharge them and they will ignite.
If you need to do this with 18650, first choose the regular cells with cobalt. They will probably be the easier ones to try. You will first need to fully charge the cells (4.2V). Then I can suggest two ways:
- increase the temperature, then the circuit breaker will not be able to stop anything. The internal temperature of the cell must be over 130°C, and then the thermal runaway reaction will start
- use a power supply to increase the voltage of the cell, but with a very low current, for example 5V 50 mA. This should bring the internal chemistry at a high voltage that will start the thermal runaway reaction without giving the circuit breaker a chance to react in time. The problem with that solution is that it can take a while before this happens so you don't have a lot of control on when the fire will start

Using a nail is another possibility. 18650 are indeed designed to not ignite when doing the "nail test", but the exact parameters of the nail test (speed, pressure) were defined by the manufacturers, and carefully chosen to be sure they would pass the test. I don't remember the exact parameters, but if you do it yourself and fast enough, on a fully charged cell, it will probably go boom. Obviously don't try this at home, use adequate protective gear, make sure the cell is held properly in place, and don't stand in the axis of the cell, etc... etc...
 
The following users thanked this post: Siwastaja, ThinkingGrenade

Offline ThinkingGrenadeTopic starter

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 5
  • Country: gb
Re: Deliberate Lithium cell overcharging
« Reply #46 on: May 16, 2019, 07:07:42 pm »

Thanks guys, very much, wasn't expecting to get this many replies.

in most cases a fire crew will just dump several hundred liters of water on any fire. the 1500L per minute from a hose rapidly removes heat out of a fire, be it electrical or otherwise. the only real exception to this is a metal fire, where this could cause significant explosion.  the packs i was originally talking about are not drill battery sized or E-bike packs but 15-25KWh-ish 300-400v battery packs.... i have never seen one of those go up before, but id like to.

and like a few people mentioned, the rise of electric vehicles will see a rise in both electrical fires, and crashes involving large battery packs. i think this kinda training for more people will be helpful

the purpose of this test is to find which method and what medium is best in a portable fire extinguisher (<20kg (BS5306). there will be complete wastes of time, like CO2, but we'd like to see if others are any real use on large battery packs. (id pick halon personally, but the Montreal protocol ruined halon for a lot of countries)

this battery test might just have to go the way of heating the few cells in the center until they go, as by the sound of things im not going to reliably get a reaction at the touch of a button, so to speak. 

100% ill post a video of it.....
 

Offline james_s

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 21611
  • Country: us
Re: Deliberate Lithium cell overcharging
« Reply #47 on: May 16, 2019, 07:27:55 pm »
I don't think halon would do much at all against a fire that has its own oxidizer. As far as I know, halon works by displacing oxygen and is used in places like museums and datacenters where water could be as damaging as fire. Taking away the oxygen in a room won't stop a battery meltdown.
 

Offline AG6QR

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 866
  • Country: us
    • AG6QR Blog
Re: Deliberate Lithium cell overcharging
« Reply #48 on: May 16, 2019, 08:52:48 pm »
I don't think halon would do much at all against a fire that has its own oxidizer. As far as I know, halon works by displacing oxygen and is used in places like museums and datacenters where water could be as damaging as fire. Taking away the oxygen in a room won't stop a battery meltdown.

Halon does not work by displacing oxygen.  It works by interfering with the intermediate products in the chain reaction between the oxygen and fuel.  It is effective at concentrations of around three percent in air, which is not a high enough concentration to displace a significant fraction of the available oxygen.

But your main point may still be true.  I don't know enough chemistry to say whether it would stop a battery thermal runaway, but my suspicion is that it would not.

On the other hand, it would be effective at stopping other nearby combustible substances from burning in air.
« Last Edit: May 16, 2019, 08:55:49 pm by AG6QR »
 

Offline james_s

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 21611
  • Country: us
Re: Deliberate Lithium cell overcharging
« Reply #49 on: May 16, 2019, 09:55:09 pm »
That's fascinating, I looked it up and read a few more details, interesting stuff. I'm surprised it's being phased out, I wouldn't have thought the amount being released would be a big problem, it's not like everyone is shooting off expensive halon extinguishers for fun.
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf