Are you really sure this is the specification you want? It's hard to see it making any sense.
You have the full opportunity to have a soft shutdown at the inverter, which is way better and more accurate than the mechanical fuse, yet you want to massively oversize this inverter, and its protection level, to "force" the fault to be seen at the inferior mechanical device? Practically you would be building a hugely expensive, massive inverter designed to work in constant-current mode into a short for extended time, instead of hickuping or faulting like they normally do, which would be an increased fire risk as well, IMHO.
Of course, there is no magic in designing it. You just design it for current you want, which, in this case, would simply mean you are designing a ten times larger inverter than you actually need, so expect it to cost ten times more as well.