P.S. Why you use IRF510?
It has a 0.5ohm internal resistance, may be something similar to IRFb4019 with 0.008ohm be more efficient?
P.P.S. Sorry, IRF630/IRF640/IRF740 i mean. Still, it is a UHF modulator 
Basically for two simple reasons:
- RF circuits are not really my field of expertise, so for the initial design i limited myself to the types that i had already used once in circuits operating at the same or higher frequencies, so i would know they should work in that application.
- Because i wanted to reduce the overall complexity of the circuit, i chose to use a readily available FET driver chip instead of the much more complex driver circuit used in the original Metcal supply. However, that chip is very tiny, and to avoid overheating i chose a FET with a really low gate charge and capacitance.
(Edit: Of course i might have been too paranoid with that. I just chose to stay on the safe side so i can get something to work correctly)
Of course that is not to say that only the IRF510 would work. But since i lack proper equipment to really evaluate other FET's, it would be up to others to see what else can be used there. The IRFB4019 that you mentioned looks interresting. It has even faster switching times, while still having a relatively low total gate charge. Might be worthwile to experiment with that one.
Greetings,
Chris
I've just repaired two MX500 power supplies (won at an eBay auction), with the help of the schematic and documentation here:
https://www.mikrocontroller.net/attachment/193474/MX-500P-11.pdfMirror:
http://scopetechniques.com/Metcal/MX-500P-11.pdfThe documentation says:
Q3 = VN0109N5
http://scopetechniques.com/Metcal/465-1342-0-VN0109.pdf /
http://scopetechniques.com/Metcal/VN0109N5.pdfQ4 = IRF530(N)
http://www.irf.com/product-info/datasheets/data/irf530npbf.pdf But in the two defect MX500's I bought they were different:
Q3 = IRF510
http://www.irf.com/product-info/datasheets/data/irf510pbf.pdfQ4 = IRF640N
http://www.irf.com/product-info/datasheets/data/irf640npbf.pdfBoth branded International Rectifier.
The amber/orange led lit up all the time in my two defect devices while the green led was always off.
I found out Q4 was shorted in both devices and after replacing it with a new IRF640N both devices work again.
It looks like Q3 (IRF510) had been replaced before in at least one of the devices, so not sure if they came with Q3 = IRF510 and Q4 = IRF640N from the factory. But it seems to work, at least so far.
Has anyone else seen an MX500 with Q3 = IRF510 and Q4 = IRF640N?
Looks like
VN0109N5 from Supertex is obsolete, so maybe Metcal started using IRF510 instead?
Now when you search
Supertex.com VN0109 seems to only be available in wafer / dies and TO-92 housing called
VN0109N3, but no TO-220 option.
And for Q4, IRF640N is a 200 V MOSFET, while IRF530(N) from the schematic is only rated at 100 V, so maybe they have replaced it because there was problems with too high voltage spikes, toasting the IRF530's? Doesn't look like IRF530N is obsolete.
Haven't done any measurements after repairing them, so not sure about the voltages Q4 handles? But since the IRF640N was toast in both of them, maybe that's not the issue?
Much to my surprise I also received a Metcal solder stand with the defect power supplies, even though this wasn't advertised. A very nice surprise as Metcal solder stands are actually very expensive and I didn't have any. Later I received a new and very nice MX-H1-AV handpiece as a birthday gift.
This came from RS Components where MX-H1-AV seems to be quite cheap compared to many others for some reason, even though RS usually isn't know for being cheap. So if anyone needs a new MX-H1-AV alloy handpiece for your DIY, Metcal or Thermaltronics/Easy Braid power supply, try to check out the price at you national RS Components site.