Electronics > Projects, Designs, and Technical Stuff
Do we still need electrolytic capacitors (for basic decoupling)?
(1/1)
TheUnnamedNewbie:
This might sound like a big of a strange question, but I have spent the last few days diving deep into the concepts of decoupling capacitors, with lots of simulations and modeling.
It got me thinking - Most LDOs have pretty good output impedance up to a few tens of kHz. Past the few tens of kHz, you are already into the regime where big electrolytic caps (especially when combined with trace inductance) are past self-resonance.
So that makes me wonder - are big electrolytics still useful? (I realize some other applications where you have high pulse-loads are a different matter entirely).
Do you still use them? Are you sure there is still a point to using them?
Siwastaja:
Great for damping resonances and peaking whenever you need to use large values of low-ESR ceramic capacitance - such as input circuitry of most switching converters.
Say, you have 100uF of ceramic capacitance - put a 470uF cheap elcap in parallel. Boom, 100% input overshoot reduced to a few %.
David Hess:
--- Quote from: TheUnnamedNewbie on April 02, 2020, 12:54:07 pm ---It got me thinking - Most LDOs have pretty good output impedance up to a few tens of kHz. Past the few tens of kHz, you are already into the regime where big electrolytic caps (especially when combined with trace inductance) are past self-resonance.
--- End quote ---
Just because they are past self resonance doesn't mean they are not providing useful decoupling; their impedance is still low to usefully high frequencies.
--- Quote ---So that makes me wonder - are big electrolytics still useful? (I realize some other applications where you have high pulse-loads are a different matter entirely).
--- End quote ---
They are hard to beat economically when bulk output capacitance is required. I only see them entirely replaced when long life and high temperature operation is required.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
Go to full version