Yes Jaj, I can not see any specific Schmitt spec,
though in this application the signal edges are distinct and
the switch families gap point levels are well separated,
so in practice there should not be any problem -
see some chip spec. examples further below.
I have no sample in stock to verify yet as the only local over the desk
professional supplier for 2M people closed and I will only mail-order
for some min. items collection.
But I plan to build your design in any working version later as this
is what every household needs
MC74LVXT4053-
Minimum High−Level Input Voltage, Channel−Select or Enable Inputs: 2.0v (stable at all temperatures)
Maximum Low−Level Input Voltage, Channel−Select or Enable Inputs: 0.8v (stable at all temperatures)
Results in a switch gap of min. 1.2v
TI CD74HC(T)4053 - at Vcc 5vMin. High-level control input voltage: ~ 3.5V
Max. Low-level control input voltage: ~ 1.5V
Results in a switch gap of min. 2.0v
(the simulation is closest to this family)
TI New version spec release 03 Mar 2023, TMUX4053 single supply (5 V to 24 V) or
dual supplies (up to ±12 V), or asymmetric supplies.Min. High-level control input voltage: 1.35V
Max. Low-level control input voltage: 0.8 V
Results in a switch gap of min. 0.55v
(this might result in close to 4 times higher frequency for the same RC?)
- This chip is also very fast.
/Bror