Parts of those things are easy enough to do, but applying them properly and consistently requires all the other things (i.e., "draw the rest of the fucking owl").
For example, trace inductance and capacitance are simply proportional to length. When it's a simple transmission line structure (a signal trace surrounded by ground), and when what we mean by "inductance" and "capacitance" are the low frequency asymptotic equivalent impedances.
If we model at a similar resolution as the geometry, we should use transmission lines instead of RLC equivalents; but your screenshot shows floating copper, which will couple to the trace on different sides. So, a whole bunch of transmission lines are going on there already, plus finer details we can't model so easily with just a few transmission lines.
Which is a modelling process, that works the same way that a general impedance might be modeled with a finite number of RLCs, for some degree of fitness.
Which in turn is underlain by mathematical theory of analysis and approximation.
Which means, you can very quickly get into the entirety of an EE curriculum's math offerings (calculus, numerical analysis, statistics?, EM, DSP?) without digging very far into this subject!
Do take confidence, I guess, that your question is not at all insurmountable; answers are not only possible, but mass producible. Producing them yourself will take a lot of work, but you can get there.
Aside: I recall a thought from Richard Feynman, that he would often contemplate approaches to a simple toy problem in wave mechanics. Consider a rubber ducky floating in a pool, in which there are many people jostling about, absorbing and creating waves. The rubber ducky is floating in one place, more or less; given that this is so, can you solve for the entire state of the pool (the waves, positions, directions and amplitudes)? Can you solve for how many people, and what positions? Pool size and shape? (In short, all the boundary conditions.) How long do you need to observe, to have such-and-such confidence in your answer? If it is in fact impossible to solve for some of these conditions, why? What would be the minimum addition to the system to be able to do so? (For example, the altitude of the rubber ducky might not be sufficient information, but including its angle -- the angle of the waves as it rides over them -- might be.)
Tim