Author Topic: Planar/PCB inductors, any good starting place/realistic specifications?  (Read 337 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline DutchGertTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 266
  • Country: nl
Hi,

I recently did a project at work where I designed a 2-phase, 54V to 12V at 115A (58A/phase)/1400W DC-DC converter based on GaN fet's.

It runs at 200kHz and for the inductors I am using 2x TDK ERU series, 1.5uH coils.

All is working great and will be in production shortly but since the inductors are relatively lossy and bulky, I was thinking of investigating the use of planar inductors. Be it integrated into the current PCB or as some separate component mounted as SMT/THT.
However, planar inductors are completely outside of my field of expertise and I have no idea if this idea actually makes sense and where to start in terms of app-notes and/or design software?

Rough specification would be:
1-2.2uH
60A Ir
~80A Isat
<1mOhm Rdc
<500mm2 footprint

Link to current inductors: [url]https://www.tdk-electronics.tdk.com/en/529778/products/product-catalog/inductors-coils/high-current-flat-wire-inductors]https://www.tdk-electronics.tdk.com/en/529778/products/product-catalog/inductors-coils/high-current-flat-wire-inductors] [url]https://www.tdk-electronics.tdk.com/en/529778/products/product-catalog/inductors-coils/high-current-flat-wire-inductors[/url]
 

Offline selcuk

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 259
  • Country: tr
Re: Planar/PCB inductors, any good starting place/realistic specifications?
« Reply #1 on: December 01, 2024, 08:20:53 pm »
I designed many PCB inductors in the past. They were for inductive sensing and not for power electronics. So I cannot say I'm experienced in this topic. There is a tool called "spiki" to generate parametric inductors. I used that one and then imported the structures into KiCad. They were pretty consistent with the simulation data.

https://github.com/in3otd/spiki
 

Offline Slh

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 153
  • Country: gb
Re: Planar/PCB inductors, any good starting place/realistic specifications?
« Reply #2 on: December 01, 2024, 08:40:24 pm »
I think that the problem you'll have with integrating into the PCB it is getting a decent fill factor and you may want a different higher temperature PCB material. At that current you want as much copper as possible and want as little other material in the gap.

Designing planar inductors isn't really too different to standard ones except the construction of the winding is different. Same sort of magnetic circuits etc.

I've never tried to get custom flat wound inductors but it's not as common as round winding. If you've got the volume then you could talk to Wurth Electronics about custom inductors as they do flat wound pq26/20 inductors already.

Perhaps I'm looking at at the wrong inductors but it looks like the ones you currently have are planar.
 

Offline mtwieg

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 330
  • Country: us
Re: Planar/PCB inductors, any good starting place/realistic specifications?
« Reply #3 on: December 02, 2024, 12:44:34 pm »
IME there are three good reasons to consider planar magnetics:
1. Need for a very low profile
2. Need excellent repeatability of parasitics (especially for transformers)
3. Need very low cost

You said your current inductor is relatively lossy, I think you should investigate that first. Could be that changing inductance or core material could resolve that. I doubt a planar design would reduce losses (for the same core material and footprint size, that is).
 

Online Someone

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5119
  • Country: au
    • send complaints here
Re: Planar/PCB inductors, any good starting place/realistic specifications?
« Reply #4 on: December 02, 2024, 09:00:27 pm »
Rough specification would be:
1-2.2uH
60A Ir
~80A Isat
<1mOhm Rdc
<500mm2 footprint
You'd need to run through some relatively obscure and painful calculations even for an approximation:
https://www.ti.com/download/trng/docs/seminar/Topic4LD.pdf
It runs at 200kHz
Without running the numbers exactly I'm feeling your requirements are many multiples away from what's realisable in a planar core.
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf