Author Topic: High Praise for the TI TPS6204X in a fault condition  (Read 841 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline envisionelecTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 285
  • Country: us
High Praise for the TI TPS6204X in a fault condition
« on: April 11, 2019, 01:08:23 pm »
A recent hand-built prototype turned up on my desk with "low voltage rails" tagged on it. It uses a 1.8V and 3.3V buck regulator formed by a pair of TPS6204X ICs. The rails were at 1.6V and 3.0V, respectively...odd, especially considering these are both fixed voltage devices. A quick FLIR image of the board showed some rapid heating of the two switcher ICs and local bypass tantalum capacitors. On further investigation, I found both SMD inductors were each turned 90 degrees on their pads, effectively sending the SW node straight into the bypass cap. What I found curious and quite impressive is that the devices held the rail voltage at a safe level in spite of this failure.

What are some unexpected but "happy" failures you've experienced?
 

Offline OwO

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1250
  • Country: cn
  • RF Engineer.
Re: High Praise for the TI TPS6204X in a fault condition
« Reply #1 on: April 11, 2019, 01:25:08 pm »
I'm only surprised that the buck IC didn't blow up like other TI power management chips tend to do :-DD

All the cheap buck ICs with integrated MOSFET have cycle-by-cycle current limiting and would have been fine as well, these use analog circuitry which can respond fast to overcurrent and overtemperature while the TI chips tend to just be a MCU and power transistors slapped onto the same die.
Email: OwOwOwOwO123@outlook.com
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf