Author Topic: Reverse engineering the Fluke WireView identifiers (Read 52376 times)

jasom · « **Reply #50 on:** March 10, 2019, 12:27:12 pm »

KuchateK: Thanks so much, I have still this problem so now I can try to repair it. I will say if it works or no.

jasom · « **Reply #51 on:** March 23, 2019, 04:42:38 pm »

Hello, I have a new problem .Can anyone tell me what is circled smd on picture? Sign on it is "5T8 RRN"

Thanks

kripton2035 · « **Reply #52 on:** May 08, 2019, 03:02:07 pm »

could you please check between the two schematics below.
there is a mix between pins 9,8 and 1 the schematics are not the same.
I tried both of them and none works for ID#1
can someone please confirm which one is the good one ?
thanks.

kripton2035 · « **Reply #53 on:** May 08, 2019, 03:03:42 pm »

I can get the ID#1 on the fluke nettool 2 display, but it tells me wires 1-2-3-4 are not wired correctly.

t523993 · « **Reply #54 on:** September 15, 2019, 06:47:03 pm »

I look for scheme for wiremap adpater to Fluke Microscanner I. Who have this scheme?

hopto · « **Reply #55 on:** December 11, 2019, 12:56:45 pm »

Hello. Can you take photos of the microscanner2 and CableIQ printed circuit boards from all sides?

martonbaksa · « **Reply #56 on:** June 20, 2020, 07:46:42 am »

Hey y'all,
You mention these WireView identifiers, are those compatible with the OneTouch Series II. According to the manual the part number for those is: N6600/RA but those don't look the same as yours, but I read on eBay that the newer ones are compatible with most older fluke units. I am not sure if I want to go down the road of making my own off these schematics unsure of if it will work.
Thanks,
Marton

Nifty · « **Reply #57 on:** May 18, 2021, 08:05:12 pm »

LinkRunner WIREMAP schematic
by Lawrence Billson
upverter.com/design/lawrencebillson/4ae5e357c2db7191/linkrunner-wiremap/

ediaz · « **Reply #58 on:** October 26, 2021, 09:08:00 am »

Will be great if somebody share the info about this to be able to replicate the process and create new ids..

@andtfoot can you share the gerbers and the lasted info? if you can, thanks a lot I will post my summary here :-D

ahrenolog · « **Reply #59 on:** November 13, 2021, 05:58:26 pm »

Hello colleagues . The following analyzer came in for repair - Fluke Networks NetTool Series 2. There were charging problems. They asked me to make identifiers, I worked in the evenings for a week, that's what happened. https://youtu.be/v9sYhZtopYk

jasom · « **Reply #60 on:** April 30, 2022, 12:08:56 pm »

Hello, its some time but, if You still can do some measurements on this device. Can You please check what voltage is on U13 on pin 6 (Vin) when You press start button?
I have 3.2V
Thank You very much

morphis · « **Reply #61 on:** May 23, 2023, 09:29:02 am »

@andtfoot Thank you for your initial work with the schematic.

I've been needing to repair my ID3 and ID4 WireView Cable ID units (Broken tabs).

So as I had to de-pot them I have some more info, and I've also measured the loopback inside my LinkRunner AT-2000.

Resistors R2, R3, R5-10, R13, R14 are the same values for each ID and the internal loopback

The internal loopback only has a single 14K3 (R4) between pin 4 and 5, Where as the Cable ID units have 4 resistors (R6-9) in the parallel-series arrangement.
Its also missing the pin-9 shield test components (R1, D5, C5).

So the only components that set the ID are R4, R11, R12 and R15

	ID0	ID1	ID3	ID4
R4	4.32K	8.66K	21.5K	34.8K
R11	1.69K	3.4K	8.45K	13.7K
R12	1.91K	3.83K	9.53K	15.4K
R15	2.15K	4.32K	10.7K	17.4K

Has anyone else have values for R4, R11, R12 and R15 from other IDs?

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16VslfwP_YgZnVYq4AyuuF9MA8dwQInBXGkP8JXn2l00/edit?usp=sharing

javier.lopez.vlc · « **Reply #62 on:** July 12, 2023, 10:36:02 pm »

Hi, I know this topic is long overdue, but I cant find a schematic to replicate the Fluke Cableiq WireView adapter.

Has anyone gotten any information on this?

They want to charge me more than €200 for a piece of plastic and two connectors. An abuse.

Thank you for your time.

AVENZ · « **Reply #63 on:** February 05, 2024, 10:46:34 pm »

Gracias por tu aportacion, fue de ayuda para hacer lo mismo en un equipo UNI-T UT685B. El texto impreso en el PCB marco 2 capacitores (C79 & C1) pero son resistencias realmente.
Intentare fabricar ID's con la informacion del Post pues hay demasiadas similitudes de diseño.
El UT685B no cuenta con ID's a la venta por el momento (Espero estar en lo correcto).
Saludos a todos.

CX=1nF
D=Diodo Schottky

AVENZ · « **Reply #64 on:** February 25, 2024, 12:57:12 am »

Ya mande a fabricar la PCB, monte los componentes y fue todo un exito. Ahora toca fabricar otros ID`S.

gabrieldevriendt · « **Reply #65 on:** June 02, 2024, 03:46:11 pm »

hey guys, anybody has a files to update higher as 2.5.4 build 1110?
If anybody needs the 2.5.4 build 1110 I can for sure also provide those files

CountParadox · « **Reply #66 on:** September 07, 2024, 11:05:50 pm »

Any info on what those capacitors are in the above diagram? Trying to replicate this work !

kripton2035 · « **Reply #67 on:** September 08, 2024, 07:30:12 am »

I recall using 10nF for this.

eta10mcleod · « **Reply #68 on:** September 29, 2024, 04:07:09 pm »

I was able to log in to the console of my Fluke LinkIQ.
Running a cable test via console prints out all the measurements the device takes.
I have attached the measurements for every Remote ID, I hope this helps.

morphis · « **Reply #69 on:** October 17, 2024, 01:06:08 pm »

Ive found the values from ID5
R12 21K
R11 18.7K
R4 47.5K
R15 23.7K

Ive updated https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16VslfwP_YgZnVYq4AyuuF9MA8dwQInBXGkP8JXn2l00/edit?usp=sharing

I think Ive calculated the values for the missing ID2 ID6 and ID7
I have also seen photos of ID8 - ID12

morphis · « **Reply #70 on:** October 24, 2024, 11:09:48 am »

I now have all the values fro ID0 thru to ID6
These values are based directly on the SMD markings for ID1 thru ID6.
For ID0 (the internal loop back port) the values for R11 R12 and R15 are measure in circuit (forward and reverse, highest value is used), the measured values match the expected values.

# \|	ID0 \|	ID1 \|	ID2 \|	ID3 \|	ID4 \|	ID5 \|	ID6
R12	1.91K	3.83K	5.76K	9.53K	15.4K	21K	30.9K
R11	1.69K	3.4K	5.11K	8.45K	13.7K	18.7K	26.7K
R4	4.32K	8.66K	13K	21.5K	34.8K	47.5K	69.8K
R15	2.15K	4.32K	6.49K	10.7K	17.4K	23.7K	34.8K

I think the following is the scheme is use to calculate R4 R11 R12 R15 for each ID

ID0 X 2 = ID1
ID0 + ID1 = ID2
ID1 + ID2 = ID3
ID2 + ID3 = ID4
ID2 + ID4 = ID5
ID3 + ID5 = ID6 ( R11 is only off by 700ohms from the actual marking on part )

These are all fitted to the E96 series at each step.
I've updated the Google sheet with the actual values for ID 0-6 and the estimates for 7+, you can see the function used to cal and fit the estimate.

PVK · « **Reply #71 on:** November 19, 2024, 09:57:55 am »

Hi All!
I am looking for the wiremap identifier of the fluke 620
Can you help me? Please!
.........................
I have one in use

BennoG · « **Reply #72 on:** November 19, 2024, 10:12:29 am »

Quote from: PVK on November 19, 2024, 09:57:55 am

Hi All!
I am looking for the wiremap identifier of the fluke 620
Can you help me? Please!

Me too, I have a x-ray image of one.

Benno

netufo · « **Reply #73 on:** November 26, 2024, 09:48:11 am »

I have fabricated ID7 and ID8 according to the parameters you released. However, they cannot be recognized normally on the LinkRunner 1000.


EEVblog Main Site	EEVblog on Youtube	EEVblog on Twitter	EEVblog on Facebook	EEVblog on Odysee

Author Topic: Reverse engineering the Fluke WireView identifiers (Read 52376 times)

Share me