Author Topic: I cut something off of my Rigol Scope Probes  (Read 10550 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline plazma

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 474
  • Country: fi
    • Homepage
Re: I cut something off of my Rigol Scope Probes
« Reply #25 on: May 28, 2016, 08:26:04 am »
I also cut my probed so they fit a Tektronix scope.
 

Offline Psi

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 10222
  • Country: nz
Re: I cut something off of my Rigol Scope Probes
« Reply #26 on: May 28, 2016, 08:26:09 am »
Just don't float your scope.
Or it may end badly.
Greek letter 'Psi' (not Pounds per Square Inch)
 

Offline xrunnerTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7641
  • Country: us
  • hp>Agilent>Keysight>???
Re: I cut something off of my Rigol Scope Probes
« Reply #27 on: May 28, 2016, 11:16:03 am »
xrunner is right.
This oscilloscope can't be used with an unearthed mains. This isolation of BNC connector is useless.
Those probes are probably intended to be used with battery powered oscilloscopes.

Check the safety instructions from the DS1054Z manual -

Page II

Ground the Instrument.
The instrument is grounded through the Protective Earth lead of the power cord. To avoid electric shock, it is essential to connect the earth terminal of the power cord to the Protective Earth terminal before connecting any inputs or outputs.

Connect the Probe Correctly.
If a probe is used, do not connect the ground lead to high voltage since it has the isobaric electric potential as ground.

Safety Class Class 1 – Grounded Product

Nowhere in the manual does it specifically state to use probes with "rubberized" coatings over the BNC connectors to satisfy any safety requirements.

So, as has been noted, any operation of the scope outside it's safety notices is done at your own personal risk.
I told my friends I could teach them to be funny, but they all just laughed at me.
 

Offline Mechatrommer

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 11713
  • Country: my
  • reassessing directives...
Re: I cut something off of my Rigol Scope Probes
« Reply #28 on: May 28, 2016, 02:50:50 pm »
ds1000e probe is better ergonomically compared to the newer design ds1000z probe, this perharps another good example why you dont want the new kids on the block to design the so called "modern design". admittedly several times i got pissed off already with the slippery new ds1000z probe design. but i dont think a full circumcision is a good idea, see below for suggestion, ie cutting small part of the rubber to make groove or negative slope for you to grab on while pulling...

as far as the isolation is concerned, few days ago i got loose earth connection to my scope (DS1000Z) so i got the usual annoying tingling going on on the gnd pigtail, i said what the hell, i push all my main sockets in the line properly and the tingling is gone. this tingling sensation of "elevated gnd" is only sensible to my thinner skin such as back of my finger, lower back body etc, i dont feel it on my face front of my finger due to thick skin i guess, or if i grab the contact point firmly with significant amount of skin surface area (making big portion of me elevated as well i guess). the worst case of "elevated gnd" / isolated device scenario i remember was few years ago when i was handling a LCD projector in a ballroom, its a brand name not one hung low, things like epson if i'm not mistaken, but it can be samsung etc, cant really remember, but the point is, not a one hung low. it has 2 pin cable, ie unearthed, so i gave up and let anybody incharged handling it. i also got occasionally from things like tv, laptop, etc. so this isolation problem is real, to my belief, anything involving SMPS inside, not particularly a DSO, but it is included... so this matter probably wont matter to you if you have thick skin from back of your palm to the lower latissimus dorsi and external oblique..
« Last Edit: May 28, 2016, 02:54:45 pm by Mechatrommer »
Nature: Evolution and the Illusion of Randomness (Stephen L. Talbott): Its now indisputable that... organisms “expertise” contextualizes its genome, and its nonsense to say that these powers are under the control of the genome being contextualized - Barbara McClintock
 
The following users thanked this post: tautech, bitseeker

steverino

  • Guest
Re: I cut something off of my Rigol Scope Probes
« Reply #29 on: May 28, 2016, 05:19:35 pm »
ds1000e probe is better ergonomically compared to the newer design ds1000z probe, this perharps another good example why you dont want the new kids on the block to design the so called "modern design". admittedly several times i got pissed off already with the slippery new ds1000z probe design. but i dont think a full circumcision is a good idea, see below for suggestion, ie cutting small part of the rubber to make groove or negative slope for you to grab on while pulling...

as far as the isolation is concerned, few days ago i got loose earth connection to my scope (DS1000Z) so i got the usual annoying tingling going on on the gnd pigtail, i said what the hell, i push all my main sockets in the line properly and the tingling is gone. this tingling sensation of "elevated gnd" is only sensible to my thinner skin such as back of my finger, lower back body etc, i dont feel it on my face front of my finger due to thick skin i guess, or if i grab the contact point firmly with significant amount of skin surface area (making big portion of me elevated as well i guess). the worst case of "elevated gnd" / isolated device scenario i remember was few years ago when i was handling a LCD projector in a ballroom, its a brand name not one hung low, things like epson if i'm not mistaken, but it can be samsung etc, cant really remember, but the point is, not a one hung low. it has 2 pin cable, ie unearthed, so i gave up and let anybody incharged handling it. i also got occasionally from things like tv, laptop, etc. so this isolation problem is real, to my belief, anything involving SMPS inside, not particularly a DSO, but it is included... so this matter probably wont matter to you if you have thick skin from back of your palm to the lower latissimus dorsi and external oblique..
This may be a stupid question, but what is the source of the elevated gnd when the mains ground is compromised?  It certainly isn't a fault, right?.  Is this an induced voltage? Does this imply there is always a current running to ground when the mains ground is properly connected?  Thanks.
 

Offline Mechatrommer

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 11713
  • Country: my
  • reassessing directives...
Re: I cut something off of my Rigol Scope Probes
« Reply #30 on: May 28, 2016, 06:48:07 pm »
who knows? someone should make a teardown study on this. probably there is capacitive coupling between power and chasis... but with a floating scope, once you connect the gnd clip to the hot line, there is no telling, no warning that the chasis is isobarically hot.
Nature: Evolution and the Illusion of Randomness (Stephen L. Talbott): Its now indisputable that... organisms “expertise” contextualizes its genome, and its nonsense to say that these powers are under the control of the genome being contextualized - Barbara McClintock
 
The following users thanked this post: tautech

Offline Gary350z

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 240
  • Country: us
Re: I cut something off of my Rigol Scope Probes
« Reply #31 on: May 28, 2016, 08:47:46 pm »
Ah that's better! I hate those rubber rings with a passion.
Great idea. :clap:  I hate those slippery connectors.

How hard was it to cut off the rubber?
Is the rubber stuck to the metal or just molded around it?
In your photo it looks like there is some residue on the BNC. Did the BNC come out clean?
I will cut mine off if it doesn't make a mess.

Thanks xrunner.
« Last Edit: May 28, 2016, 08:50:56 pm by Gary350z »
 

Offline Monkeh

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8051
  • Country: gb
Re: I cut something off of my Rigol Scope Probes
« Reply #32 on: May 28, 2016, 08:55:35 pm »
It's plastic with an overmould, so it takes a good sharp knife, but it's not hard. Just moulded on, so cut a slot down it and pry it free.

E: Actually, I think they were just pushed on, but they'll probably resist being yanked off quite aggressively.
« Last Edit: May 28, 2016, 09:06:35 pm by Monkeh »
 

Offline xrunnerTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7641
  • Country: us
  • hp>Agilent>Keysight>???
Re: I cut something off of my Rigol Scope Probes
« Reply #33 on: May 28, 2016, 09:29:30 pm »
Great idea. :clap:  I hate those slippery connectors.

How hard was it to cut off the rubber? ...


Yes Monkeh answered your questions.

I wouldn't have bothered to cut them off if they had not been so slippery to remove. I have other cables (from China)  that have coverings on the BNC and they are no problem at all to remove. Rigol simply picked a bad design IMHO.

In picture left = easy; right = hard.
I told my friends I could teach them to be funny, but they all just laughed at me.
 

Offline Pjotr

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 461
  • Country: nl
Re: I cut something off of my Rigol Scope Probes
« Reply #34 on: May 28, 2016, 11:17:32 pm »
What's the problem with al that isolation issues? The Rigols are NEVER made and intended to probe mains levels like the portable Tek with full isolated channels. Doing so is simply stupid and that belongs to basic knowledge. This not only holds for the Rigols but any instrument not specially made for dealing mains voltages.

The probes that come with the Rigol scopes are at the $10 level you find on Ebay. They have to cut costs somewhere... That plastic boots are only cosmetic (and good to make a lot of noise about safety is seems).
 

Offline Gary350z

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 240
  • Country: us
Re: I cut something off of my Rigol Scope Probes
« Reply #35 on: May 29, 2016, 12:22:50 am »
Great idea. :clap:  I hate those slippery connectors.

How hard was it to cut off the rubber? ...


I wouldn't have bothered to cut them off if they had not been so slippery to remove.

Mine are so slippery I sometimes have to pull on the cable. I'll give the knife a try. :)
 

steverino

  • Guest
Re: I cut something off of my Rigol Scope Probes
« Reply #36 on: June 03, 2016, 11:46:41 pm »
ds1000e probe is better ergonomically compared to the newer design ds1000z probe, this perharps another good example why you dont want the new kids on the block to design the so called "modern design". admittedly several times i got pissed off already with the slippery new ds1000z probe design. but i dont think a full circumcision is a good idea, see below for suggestion, ie cutting small part of the rubber to make groove or negative slope for you to grab on while pulling...

as far as the isolation is concerned, few days ago i got loose earth connection to my scope (DS1000Z) so i got the usual annoying tingling going on on the gnd pigtail, i said what the hell, i push all my main sockets in the line properly and the tingling is gone. this tingling sensation of "elevated gnd" is only sensible to my thinner skin such as back of my finger, lower back body etc, i dont feel it on my face front of my finger due to thick skin i guess, or if i grab the contact point firmly with significant amount of skin surface area (making big portion of me elevated as well i guess). the worst case of "elevated gnd" / isolated device scenario i remember was few years ago when i was handling a LCD projector in a ballroom, its a brand name not one hung low, things like epson if i'm not mistaken, but it can be samsung etc, cant really remember, but the point is, not a one hung low. it has 2 pin cable, ie unearthed, so i gave up and let anybody incharged handling it. i also got occasionally from things like tv, laptop, etc. so this isolation problem is real, to my belief, anything involving SMPS inside, not particularly a DSO, but it is included... so this matter probably wont matter to you if you have thick skin from back of your palm to the lower latissimus dorsi and external oblique..
This may be a stupid question, but what is the source of the elevated gnd when the mains ground is compromised?  It certainly isn't a fault, right?.  Is this an induced voltage? Does this imply there is always a current running to ground when the mains ground is properly connected?  Thanks.

I just ran across this document from Fluke which discusses "leakage current".  I wasn't aware of this and it probably provides the answer to my own question. http://www.fluke.com/fluke/uses/comunidad/fluke-news-plus/articlecategories/electrical/leakagebasics
 

Offline LukeW

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 686
Re: I cut something off of my Rigol Scope Probes
« Reply #37 on: June 04, 2016, 03:16:14 am »
On a more serious note.  Isn't it common to plug in a non insulated bnc tee, for example, to terminate into 50 Ohms?  There will always be a potential issue if you defeat the grounding of the scope, no?  As Mr. Carlson says, "you do so at your own risk".

Absolutely.

If the oscilloscope industry wanted to really protect people, they would do a complete connector solution, something like DMMs, where not only the internal but the external connections are completely insulated from the user. As it is now, you can still touch the same potential on other BNCs that one or more probe covers are insulating you from, as has been pointed out.

Do all of this testing and modification at your own risk!

If the oscilloscope industry wanted to really protect people... they would sell scopes, or probes and adapter units, that are fully galvanically isolated and appropriately tested/rated for a certain level of safety in these kinds of differential floating applications. Which of course they do sell.

If you work with a floating scope, then you need to know what you're doing, and it's not the manufacturer's responsibility to babysit you. The oscilloscope chassis, and every connector and port that is normally grounded, is floating relative to mains earth.
 

Offline karoru

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 196
  • Country: pl
Re: I cut something off of my Rigol Scope Probes
« Reply #38 on: June 05, 2016, 05:22:25 pm »
On a more serious note.  Isn't it common to plug in a non insulated bnc tee, for example, to terminate into 50 Ohms?  There will always be a potential issue if you defeat the grounding of the scope, no?  As Mr. Carlson says, "you do so at your own risk".

Absolutely.

If the oscilloscope industry wanted to really protect people, they would do a complete connector solution, something like DMMs, where not only the internal but the external connections are completely insulated from the user. As it is now, you can still touch the same potential on other BNCs that one or more probe covers are insulating you from, as has been pointed out.

Do all of this testing and modification at your own risk!
If the oscilloscope industry wanted to really protect people... they would sell scopes, or probes and adapter units, that are fully galvanically isolated and appropriately tested/rated for a certain level of safety in these kinds of differential floating applications. Which of course they do sell.

If you work with a floating scope, then you need to know what you're doing, and it's not the manufacturer's responsibility to babysit you. The oscilloscope chassis, and every connector and port that is normally grounded, is floating relative to mains earth.
Yup, for example my Philips PM3540 is floating by design. It doesn't even have ground pin on plug. If it had plug from one of countries where all plugs are 3-terminal, the only thing one could notice is that there's one line like "Hey, it's floating, because TV's, mon. Beware!" written in small print in the manual:)
 

Online TheSteve

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 3781
  • Country: ca
  • Living the Dream
Re: I cut something off of my Rigol Scope Probes
« Reply #39 on: June 05, 2016, 05:34:56 pm »
The moldings do look quite nice but are shaped rather poorly. The BNC jacks feel almost like they suction themselves onto the scope. I don't see removing the molding as any kind of safely issue on a scope with common probe grounds.

In the case of the Tektronix THS portable scopes pictured earlier in this thread then the shrouding is critical for safety and has nothing to do with aesthetics as it has isolated inputs.
VE7FM
 

Offline electr_peter

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 1411
  • Country: lt
Re: I cut something off of my Rigol Scope Probes
« Reply #40 on: June 06, 2016, 08:34:17 pm »
As a user of DS1000Z, I agree with comment about bad form factor of BNC mouldings. At first glance, they look OK and connect to scope very easily, but disconnection is definitely more difficult - connector tend to stick and your fingers cannot grip and generate enough pull to remove it in one go.

However, in my setup I do not reconnect probes too often for this to be an issue requiring mechanical intervention.
 

Offline bitseeker

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 9057
  • Country: us
  • Lots of engineer-tweakable parts inside!
Re: I cut something off of my Rigol Scope Probes
« Reply #41 on: June 06, 2016, 10:06:36 pm »
Two good grip mods here. Thanks, I'll keep these in mind should mine annoy me. It's better to mod the inconsequential rubber jacket than to pull on the cables and shorten the probe's life.
TEA is the way. | TEA Time channel
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf