Just a couple first thoughts after reading the datasheet:
- It can act as a reader, or as a tag. The AS3953 could only act as a tag.
- It has no embedded EEPROM as far as I've seen. The AS3953 did.
- It has a 512-byte FIFO for data. The AS3953 only had a 32-byte one AFAIR.
- It supports up to 848 kbits/s. Same as the AS3953.
- It has apparently no energy harvesting ability. The AS3953 did; you could get up to a few mA from the NFC field, that you could use to power other stuff.
- The power consumption seems higher than for the AS3953. I would have to dig a little further though, because in "tag" mode, it seems less straightforward to interpret the given figures than with the AS3953.
You can refer to this for a comparison:
https://ams.com/AS3953So, looks like I'll still be missing the AS3953. Damn ams, why did you discontinue it? Not enough market?
