Electronics > Projects, Designs, and Technical Stuff
LM317 digital control
<< < (10/12) > >>
Maobuff:

--- Quote from: Liv on May 22, 2016, 10:22:24 pm ---Using LM317 beyond its standard features is a bad idea. I recently made a PSU adjustable 0..±15 V and 0..+5 V based on LM317/337. The number of auxiliary parts was larger. In addition, it was necessary to add the supervisor scheme, since the power is turned off at the output there was a voltage surge. If you need a power supply with CC and CV modes, properly do it on discrete components. Here is a good example of a simple power supply with the processor control.

--- End quote ---

Nice PSU there. Actually its ok to use lm317 as CC, there a circuit in datasheet. But its hard to control it digitally.
ZeTeX:

--- Quote from: Maobuff on May 23, 2016, 09:57:04 am ---
--- Quote from: Liv on May 22, 2016, 10:22:24 pm ---Using LM317 beyond its standard features is a bad idea. I recently made a PSU adjustable 0..±15 V and 0..+5 V based on LM317/337. The number of auxiliary parts was larger. In addition, it was necessary to add the supervisor scheme, since the power is turned off at the output there was a voltage surge. If you need a power supply with CC and CV modes, properly do it on discrete components. Here is a good example of a simple power supply with the processor control.

--- End quote ---

Nice PSU there. Actually its ok to use lm317 as CC, there a circuit in datasheet. But its hard to control it digitally.

--- End quote ---
Using LM317 As constant current and other LM317 as CV is using it standard features, they give you a schematic with CC + CV in the datasheet.
ZayneTech:
http://www.circuitstoday.com/few-lm317-voltage-regulator-circuits
Check out this picture

RES:
Another idea.
Zero999:

--- Quote from: ZeTeX on May 23, 2016, 11:46:40 am ---
--- Quote from: Maobuff on May 23, 2016, 09:57:04 am ---
--- Quote from: Liv on May 22, 2016, 10:22:24 pm ---Using LM317 beyond its standard features is a bad idea. I recently made a PSU adjustable 0..±15 V and 0..+5 V based on LM317/337. The number of auxiliary parts was larger. In addition, it was necessary to add the supervisor scheme, since the power is turned off at the output there was a voltage surge. If you need a power supply with CC and CV modes, properly do it on discrete components. Here is a good example of a simple power supply with the processor control.

--- End quote ---

Nice PSU there. Actually its ok to use lm317 as CC, there a circuit in datasheet. But its hard to control it digitally.

--- End quote ---
Using LM317 As constant current and other LM317 as CV is using it standard features, they give you a schematic with CC + CV in the datasheet.

--- End quote ---
Yes that works, but a big downside of using two LM317s in series is the huge drop-out voltage, as they both add together. The CC circuit will need the usual 3V of headroom plus 1.25V, giving 4.25V, plus the CV circuit requiring the usual 3V: a total of 7.25V!


--- Quote from: ZayneTech on February 02, 2019, 10:02:52 pm ---http://www.circuitstoday.com/few-lm317-voltage-regulator-circuits
Check out this picture

--- End quote ---
The base resistors are missing.

It works better with MOSFETs.
Navigation
Message Index
Next page
Previous page
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...

Go to full version
Powered by SMFPacks Advanced Attachments Uploader Mod