Author Topic: MAX811 as debounce?  (Read 771 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline technixTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3508
  • Country: cn
  • From Shanghai With Love
    • My Untitled Blog
MAX811 as debounce?
« on: August 24, 2019, 04:18:29 pm »
For a button that is not intended to be pressed frequently, is MAX811 (and its clones) a good candidate for a debouncing chip?
 

Offline MosherIV

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1530
  • Country: gb
Re: MAX811 as debounce?
« Reply #1 on: August 24, 2019, 06:13:07 pm »
A 555 in monstable is just as good
 

Offline Zero999

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 20357
  • Country: gb
  • 0999
Re: MAX811 as debounce?
« Reply #2 on: August 24, 2019, 06:20:17 pm »
A 555 in monstable is just as good
I wouldn't say that. The 555 is more flexible, but it uses much more power, than the MAX811 and requires more external components.

The MAX811 seems to be up to the job, but why not do it using software?
 

Online David Hess

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 17427
  • Country: us
  • DavidH
Re: MAX811 as debounce?
« Reply #3 on: August 24, 2019, 06:22:20 pm »
For a button that is not intended to be pressed frequently, is MAX811 (and its clones) a good candidate for a debouncing chip?

Sure, I would tend to use a more general solution but the MAX811 is a great choice if the power-on-reset function is acceptable.
 

Offline technixTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3508
  • Country: cn
  • From Shanghai With Love
    • My Untitled Blog
Re: MAX811 as debounce?
« Reply #4 on: August 25, 2019, 03:35:10 am »
A 555 in monstable is just as good
I wouldn't say that. The 555 is more flexible, but it uses much more power, than the MAX811 and requires more external components.

The MAX811 seems to be up to the job, but why not do it using software?
Software debouncing may not be an option here.
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf