Author Topic: New favourite opamp for measuring equipment - AD8605ARTZ  (Read 3578 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ddavideborTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1190
  • Country: gb
    • Smartbox AT
New favourite opamp for measuring equipment - AD8605ARTZ
« on: September 04, 2019, 11:17:26 am »
Hello guys,

I want to share with you a component that I have decided to adopt in a broad range of products (scientific equipment for physics).

I was looking for an opamp with as many of the following characteristics as possible:

  • RRIO (Rail to Rail Input and Output)
  • offset voltage under 100uV max 50uV typical
  • input bias current < 100pA
  • output current >40mA with 1V drop
  • unity gain stable
  • stable with capacitive loads
  • continuous output short circuit without damage
  • cheap to source in Shenzhen
  • available in single packages
  • under 40 cents @ 100pcs
  • second source available

The target product is a wide variety of measuring equipment where thus opamp should be used in a series of standard analog circuitry, such as:

  • input buffers
  • precision comparators
  • inverting and non-inverting amplifiers
  • filters
  • precision rectifiers
  • voltage clamps
  • ac amplifiers
  • current sources

Now, I did not think i would find something like this... but indeed there is, the AD8605 and it's Chinese pin compatible equivalent TP2311 available for around 0.3$ and 0.22$ respectively

The technology Analog Devices used to achieve such performance is pretty interesting https://www.analog.com/en/design-center/landing-pages/001/digitrim-technology.html

This little buddy does the work of laser-trimmed opamps at a much lower price
David - Professional Engineer - Medical Devices and Tablet Computers at Smartbox AT
Side businesses: Altium Industry Expert writer, http://fermium.ltd.uk (Scientific Equiment), http://chinesecleavers.co.uk (Cutlery),
 
The following users thanked this post: thm_w

Online Kleinstein

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 15151
  • Country: de
Re: New favourite opamp for measuring equipment - AD8605ARTZ
« Reply #1 on: September 04, 2019, 12:38:02 pm »
The data of this OP don't look very impressive.  In the graph the CMRR looks good at high frequency - not sure if this is true.
The offset voltage as a function of common mode voltage looks relatively poor, indicating poor CMRR (some 70dB) even at low frequency.

Rail to Rail input is a two sided thing: they usually have a cross over region, where the input changes between input stages. So in this case there is a range of some 0.5 V (e.g. 3.3-3.8 V with 5 V supply) that is no usable for precision applications.

 

Offline OM222O

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 768
  • Country: gb
Re: New favourite opamp for measuring equipment - AD8605ARTZ
« Reply #2 on: September 04, 2019, 01:03:21 pm »
The high output current (40mA is on the large side for an op amp!) contradicts the precision requirements.
Also no bandwidth limit was mentioned  ??? A lot of physics instruments run at high frequencies  :-//
The capacitive load requirement is also odd ... non of the applications you listed require high capacitive loads.

anyhow, my personal go to op amps for precision work are the MAX4238 and the OPA188 / OPA187. they are a bit pricy (>1$ even at volume) but have been very decent and robust parts.
 

Offline ddavideborTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1190
  • Country: gb
    • Smartbox AT
Re: New favourite opamp for measuring equipment - AD8605ARTZ
« Reply #3 on: September 04, 2019, 03:01:25 pm »
The data of this OP don't look very impressive.  In the graph the CMRR looks good at high frequency - not sure if this is true.
The offset voltage as a function of common mode voltage looks relatively poor, indicating poor CMRR (some 70dB) even at low frequency.

Rail to Rail input is a two sided thing: they usually have a cross over region, where the input changes between input stages. So in this case there is a range of some 0.5 V (e.g. 3.3-3.8 V with 5 V supply) that is no usable for precision applications.

The cross-over region is an excellent point. I was not able to get it to act out in simulations, do you have a suggestion on how i would be able to better test this behaviour?
David - Professional Engineer - Medical Devices and Tablet Computers at Smartbox AT
Side businesses: Altium Industry Expert writer, http://fermium.ltd.uk (Scientific Equiment), http://chinesecleavers.co.uk (Cutlery),
 

Offline ddavideborTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1190
  • Country: gb
    • Smartbox AT
Re: New favourite opamp for measuring equipment - AD8605ARTZ
« Reply #4 on: September 04, 2019, 03:13:10 pm »
The high output current (40mA is on the large side for an op amp!) contradicts the precision requirements.
Also no bandwidth limit was mentioned  ??? A lot of physics instruments run at high frequencies  :-//
The capacitive load requirement is also odd ... non of the applications you listed require high capacitive loads.

anyhow, my personal go to op amps for precision work are the MAX4238 and the OPA188 / OPA187. they are a bit pricy (>1$ even at volume) but have been very decent and robust parts.

In my case bandwidth requirements are very limited. Many of the instruments I design stop at a few hundred KHz. Not really in the counting photons business for now (though I do have one light speed measuring apparatus in the work that works at 2GHz :-) - well, will I hope. )

For the capacitive loads... peak detectors have a "hold" capacitor inside. When using it as an analog output buffer (I often have many analog outputs as everyone prefers a different datalogger and big resellers like to drop their favourite one in the kit as well) and there is the capacitive load of the wire and possibly datalogger input.

I also like and have used the MAX4238 as my go-to chopper opamp.

High output current has been very useful to me to simplify the feedback loop of current generators by removing the mosfet/bjt. Yeah i guess i could use a different opamp for that, and indeed had. Trying to slim the bom helps the wallet with the more low production number equipment.

« Last Edit: September 04, 2019, 03:18:13 pm by ddavidebor »
David - Professional Engineer - Medical Devices and Tablet Computers at Smartbox AT
Side businesses: Altium Industry Expert writer, http://fermium.ltd.uk (Scientific Equiment), http://chinesecleavers.co.uk (Cutlery),
 

Offline OM222O

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 768
  • Country: gb
Re: New favourite opamp for measuring equipment - AD8605ARTZ
« Reply #5 on: September 04, 2019, 03:46:45 pm »
for peak detectors, I think you should consider dropping the capacitor value and invest some time in learning how to minimize leakage current using guard traces  ;)
you can easily get away with 100pF or at worst case scenario 1nF with proper design  :-+

as for the current sources ... ah man! it hurts to hear you're using the op amp to directly drive the load  :-DD the "feedback loop" is only 2 resistors and a capacitor. doing the AC analysis of it is also fairly trivial, shouldn't take more than 10 to 15 mins in ltspice! I would also encourage you about reading a bit more in that department.

If you're really tight on the budget, it's fine, but I think a doubling or even tripling the cost of op amps (from 0.4$ to 1.2$) isn't going to reduce the profit margins by much, especially since you mentioned working in lower volumes!
« Last Edit: September 04, 2019, 03:49:01 pm by OM222O »
 

Online 2N3055

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7465
  • Country: hr
Re: New favourite opamp for measuring equipment - AD8605ARTZ
« Reply #6 on: September 04, 2019, 03:56:41 pm »
The data of this OP don't look very impressive.  In the graph the CMRR looks good at high frequency - not sure if this is true.
The offset voltage as a function of common mode voltage looks relatively poor, indicating poor CMRR (some 70dB) even at low frequency.

Rail to Rail input is a two sided thing: they usually have a cross over region, where the input changes between input stages. So in this case there is a range of some 0.5 V (e.g. 3.3-3.8 V with 5 V supply) that is no usable for precision applications.

The cross-over region is an excellent point. I was not able to get it to act out in simulations, do you have a suggestion on how i would be able to better test this behaviour?

One way to check for problems is to sweep common mode voltage on inputs and look at offset voltage..
Also you could inject small AC signal with DC offset and look for distortion while varying DC offset. When you hit the knee distortions will rise..

"Just hard work is not enough - it must be applied sensibly."
Dr. Richard W. Hamming
 

Offline ddavideborTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1190
  • Country: gb
    • Smartbox AT
Re: New favourite opamp for measuring equipment - AD8605ARTZ
« Reply #7 on: September 04, 2019, 04:26:25 pm »
for peak detectors, I think you should consider dropping the capacitor value and invest some time in learning how to minimize leakage current using guard traces  ;)
you can easily get away with 100pF or at worst case scenario 1nF with proper design  :-+

Capacitors have leakage current too.

The load is indeed part of the feedback loop. Suggesting to follow your own advice, I endorse the following:
The Art of Electronics 3rd Edition, by Paul Horowitz and Winfield Hill

;)

...


as for the current sources ... ah man! it hurts to hear you're using the op amp to directly drive the load  :-DD the "feedback loop" is only 2 resistors and a capacitor. doing the AC analysis of it is also fairly trivial, shouldn't take more than 10 to 15 mins in ltspice! I would also encourage you about reading a bit more in that department.

The load is part of the feedback loop... May I recommend to you The Art of Electronics 3rd Edition by Horowitz and Hill ?


If you're really tight on the budget, it's fine, but I think a doubling or even tripling the cost of op amps (from 0.4$ to 1.2$) isn't going to reduce the profit margins by much, especially since you mentioned working in lower volumes!

If there is no need for it then it's 0.8$ wasted (times 20 times 20pcs) that's 300+$ that is better spent on plane tickets to go meet resellers and customers in person.
Money adds up pretty quickly. And the circuit are not made of only opamps. Were I to design instruments with this little regard to budget we would be long out of business.

David - Professional Engineer - Medical Devices and Tablet Computers at Smartbox AT
Side businesses: Altium Industry Expert writer, http://fermium.ltd.uk (Scientific Equiment), http://chinesecleavers.co.uk (Cutlery),
 

Offline ddavideborTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1190
  • Country: gb
    • Smartbox AT
Re: New favourite opamp for measuring equipment - AD8605ARTZ
« Reply #8 on: September 04, 2019, 04:30:18 pm »
The data of this OP don't look very impressive.  In the graph the CMRR looks good at high frequency - not sure if this is true.
The offset voltage as a function of common mode voltage looks relatively poor, indicating poor CMRR (some 70dB) even at low frequency.

Rail to Rail input is a two sided thing: they usually have a cross over region, where the input changes between input stages. So in this case there is a range of some 0.5 V (e.g. 3.3-3.8 V with 5 V supply) that is no usable for precision applications.

The cross-over region is an excellent point. I was not able to get it to act out in simulations, do you have a suggestion on how i would be able to better test this behaviour?

One way to check for problems is to sweep common mode voltage on inputs and look at offset voltage..
Also you could inject small AC signal with DC offset and look for distortion while varying DC offset. When you hit the knee distortions will rise..

Mmh. Tried that in spice without seeing any knee... have to do some tests IRL.
David - Professional Engineer - Medical Devices and Tablet Computers at Smartbox AT
Side businesses: Altium Industry Expert writer, http://fermium.ltd.uk (Scientific Equiment), http://chinesecleavers.co.uk (Cutlery),
 

Online Kleinstein

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 15151
  • Country: de
Re: New favourite opamp for measuring equipment - AD8605ARTZ
« Reply #9 on: September 04, 2019, 06:56:52 pm »
The input stage cross over is not part of the Spice models. If at all the different noise levels may be included. The not the not so good CMRR in the cross over region and possibly different offsets on both sides are more like uncertainties with ideally 0. Similar OP models usually have zero offset.

Especially when cost sensitive, the choice of OP depends on the circuit.
The AD8605 is fast and low cost with a relatively good offset for a CMOS OP. So it can be a good choice for some applications. However there are many low cost CMOS OPs for a 5 V supply to choose from.
At least at mouser the AD8605 is not that cheap - more like relatively expensive.

For the use in a peak detector the more critical leakage is usually the diode(s). Fast diodes (e.g. 1N4148) tend to have quite some leakage, while low leakage diodes are usually slow.  How critical leakage is, also depends a lot on the needed hold time. Capacitor leakage should be less of an issue, it's more about leakage on the board, parasitic capacitance and the settling of the OPs that could cause errors with fast peaks.
 

Online magic

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7453
  • Country: pl
Re: New favourite opamp for measuring equipment - AD8605ARTZ
« Reply #10 on: September 04, 2019, 07:23:09 pm »
TI has similar technology they call e-trim.
Some part numbers: opa376, opa191, opa192.
I don't remember their specs and have no idea if they are suitable for your use, but I remember very good offset specs not far behind auto-zero chips.

The weakest part is as usual the rail-to-rail input stage. It frankly is a gimmick. :--

BTW, here's the figure you are looking for from AD8605 datasheet.
As you can see, offset voltage wobble in the input crossover region can exceed 100µVpp.
 
The following users thanked this post: thm_w

Offline David Hess

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 17427
  • Country: us
  • DavidH
Re: New favourite opamp for measuring equipment - AD8605ARTZ
« Reply #11 on: September 04, 2019, 08:26:13 pm »
RRIO (Rail to Rail Input and Output)

A rail-to-rail input conflicts with precision because of crossover effects unless a boost supply is used and there are some parts which do this internally.

Quote
offset voltage under 100uV max 50uV typical

Taking advantage of low offset voltage for precision in non-inverting applications means also having a high common mode rejection ratio which the AD8605 lacks.  The power supply rejection is commensurately low as well. 

AD brags about low noise at 8nV/√Hz and 2.3uVpp for the AD8605 however contrasting this with a real precision part like the LT6010 (1) which is 14nV/√Hz and 0.4uVpp (!) reveals that the AD8605 has very high flicker noise which is typical of CMOS parts.

The AD8605 is not a precision operational amplifier despite its trimmed offset voltage.  I would consider it more of a general purpose part and it may be completely adequate for your needs.  Above I am just pointing out the more obscure issues I would consider.
 
Quote
  • output current >40mA with 1V drop
How output current conflicts with precision because of self heating.  Precision applications must minimize change in power dissipation with signal level.  I would be leery of operating a part close to its maximum current rating if reliability is desired.

The cross-over region is an excellent point. I was not able to get it to act out in simulations, do you have a suggestion on how i would be able to better test this behaviour?

Doing a cross plot of the offset versus common mode voltage on an oscilloscope will reveal the problem.  National Semiconductor published some application notes about it and Bob Pease discussed it.

(1) The LT6010/1/2 S/D/Q are modernized versions of the LT1008/LT1012/LT1097 S/S/S which are themselves descendants of the LM308 and LM11 but with rail-to-rail outputs and might be considered "universal" precision operational amplifiers.  They are useful as a benchmark but do not really meet your other requirements.
 

Offline David Hess

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 17427
  • Country: us
  • DavidH
Re: New favourite opamp for measuring equipment - AD8605ARTZ
« Reply #12 on: September 04, 2019, 08:28:51 pm »
TI has similar technology they call e-trim.
Some part numbers: opa376, opa191, opa192.
I don't remember their specs and have no idea if they are suitable for your use, but I remember very good offset specs not far behind auto-zero chips.

The weakest part is as usual the rail-to-rail input stage. It frankly is a gimmick. :--

I do not know how to find them in their selection guides but TI even makes some dual input stage rail-to-rail input parts with a 3rd input voltage which sets the transition region so you can move it away from your input signal level.
 

Offline ddavideborTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1190
  • Country: gb
    • Smartbox AT
Re: New favourite opamp for measuring equipment - AD8605ARTZ
« Reply #13 on: September 05, 2019, 01:20:38 am »
The input stage cross over is not part of the Spice models. If at all the different noise levels may be included. The not the not so good CMRR in the cross over region and possibly different offsets on both sides are more like uncertainties with ideally 0. Similar OP models usually have zero offset.

Damn... the future is not yet today...

TI has similar technology they call e-trim.
Some part numbers: opa376, opa191, opa192.
I don't remember their specs and have no idea if they are suitable for your use, but I remember very good offset specs not far behind auto-zero chips.

The weakest part is as usual the rail-to-rail input stage. It frankly is a gimmick. :--

BTW, here's the figure you are looking for from AD8605 datasheet.
As you can see, offset voltage wobble in the input crossover region can exceed 100µVpp.
(Attachment Link)

I mean TBH I'd be happy enough with 500mV to the positive rail as long as I can get everything working on 5V, that would cover almost all applications I do.

Thank you for the picture. I only found it in black and white. If I am not mistaken by the late hour, using it in an inverting configuration with a 2.5 ref voltage (what I use for pretty much everything) that would be fine. But indeed it makes less sense for non-inverting configurations.

The opa376 is indeed very interesting. The offset is pretty very low up until VCC-1.3V and it is available with the same package and pinout for 1$.
BUT after VCC-1.3V it gets in the mV range, while the AD8605 has 80uV typical with 300uV max over the whole supply range.
cons: has even worst CMRR

The TP2311 I mentioned earlier after further investigation appears to be a clone of the OPA376.
Also, the OPA2376 costs 1.2$, thus let's say it's a 60 cent opamp.

Curiously, the TP2311 chinese opamp claims much better CMRR than both https://datasheet.lcsc.com/szlcsc/1907250931_3PEAK-TP2311-TR_C116439.pdf
To be trusted? mmh...




RRIO (Rail to Rail Input and Output)

A rail-to-rail input conflicts with precision because of crossover effects unless a boost supply is used and there are some parts which do this internally.

Quote
offset voltage under 100uV max 50uV typical

Taking advantage of low offset voltage for precision in non-inverting applications means also having a high common mode rejection ratio which the AD8605 lacks.  The power supply rejection is commensurately low as well. 

AD brags about low noise at 8nV/√Hz and 2.3uVpp for the AD8605 however contrasting this with a real precision part like the LT6010 (1) which is 14nV/√Hz and 0.4uVpp (!) reveals that the AD8605 has very high flicker noise which is typical of CMOS parts.

The AD8605 is not a precision operational amplifier despite its trimmed offset voltage.  I would consider it more of a general purpose part and it may be completely adequate for your needs.  Above I am just pointing out the more obscure issues I would consider.
 
Quote
  • output current >40mA with 1V drop
How output current conflicts with precision because of self heating.  Precision applications must minimize change in power dissipation with signal level.  I would be leery of operating a part close to its maximum current rating if reliability is desired.

The cross-over region is an excellent point. I was not able to get it to act out in simulations, do you have a suggestion on how i would be able to better test this behaviour?

Doing a cross plot of the offset versus common mode voltage on an oscilloscope will reveal the problem.  National Semiconductor published some application notes about it and Bob Pease discussed it.

(1) The LT6010/1/2 S/D/Q are modernized versions of the LT1008/LT1012/LT1097 S/S/S which are themselves descendants of the LM308 and LM11 but with rail-to-rail outputs and might be considered "universal" precision operational amplifiers.  They are useful as a benchmark but do not really meet your other requirements.


Thank you for all this insightful information. Indeed the noise figures looked a bit misleading. [/list]
« Last Edit: September 05, 2019, 01:26:01 am by ddavidebor »
David - Professional Engineer - Medical Devices and Tablet Computers at Smartbox AT
Side businesses: Altium Industry Expert writer, http://fermium.ltd.uk (Scientific Equiment), http://chinesecleavers.co.uk (Cutlery),
 

Online Kleinstein

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 15151
  • Country: de
Re: New favourite opamp for measuring equipment - AD8605ARTZ
« Reply #14 on: September 05, 2019, 06:32:05 am »
For the CMRR data it is a little had to tell if this is to trust. It is not impossible to get very good values if something like a bootstrapped cascode is used. The very low THD value also suggest good CMRR. So it is not only that one number.

By the way: the CMRR value for the AD8605 also look a little odd - it looks better than graph for offset via common mode voltage.
 

Online magic

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7453
  • Country: pl
Re: New favourite opamp for measuring equipment - AD8605ARTZ
« Reply #15 on: September 05, 2019, 09:05:22 am »
Curiously, the TP2311 chinese opamp claims much better CMRR than both https://datasheet.lcsc.com/szlcsc/1907250931_3PEAK-TP2311-TR_C116439.pdf
To be trusted? mmh...
It's weird. On one hand, they say 106dB typical at 2.5V. On the other, their CMMR vs input voltage plot shows 150dB at 2.5V and CMRR vs frequency says 160dB at DC :-//
And they are very careful not to say anything about CMRR at the input stage crossover point.

For the CMRR data it is a little had to tell if this is to trust. It is not impossible to get very good values if something like a bootstrapped cascode is used. The very low THD value also suggest good CMRR. So it is not only that one number.
THD+N is only specified at 1Vpp at unity gain, though.

By the way: the CMRR value for the AD8605 also look a little odd - it looks better than graph for offset via common mode voltage.
Well, the difference between offset at 0V and at 5V is about 50µV. Dividing it by 5V we get box method CMRR of 100dB typical |O :-DD
« Last Edit: September 05, 2019, 09:10:52 am by magic »
 

Offline ddavideborTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1190
  • Country: gb
    • Smartbox AT
Re: New favourite opamp for measuring equipment - AD8605ARTZ
« Reply #16 on: September 05, 2019, 10:32:45 am »
Curiously, the TP2311 chinese opamp claims much better CMRR than both https://datasheet.lcsc.com/szlcsc/1907250931_3PEAK-TP2311-TR_C116439.pdf
To be trusted? mmh...
It's weird. On one hand, they say 106dB typical at 2.5V. On the other, their CMMR vs input voltage plot shows 150dB at 2.5V and CMRR vs frequency says 160dB at DC :-//
And they are very careful not to say anything about CMRR at the input stage crossover point.



I've written 3PEAK out of curiosity... let's wait and see...

David - Professional Engineer - Medical Devices and Tablet Computers at Smartbox AT
Side businesses: Altium Industry Expert writer, http://fermium.ltd.uk (Scientific Equiment), http://chinesecleavers.co.uk (Cutlery),
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf