Author Topic: Output Earthing of SMPS and Appliance Class (I or II)  (Read 2825 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online TimNJTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1720
  • Country: us
Output Earthing of SMPS and Appliance Class (I or II)
« on: January 22, 2020, 10:58:10 pm »
Hi all,

We've been having a bit of a philosophical(?) debate in my office about proper classification of switch-mode power adapters. I'm hesitant to call it a philosophical debate because I feel there has to be a right and wrong answer here.

The company I work for manufacturers switch-mode power adapters...predominantly wall-plug in type.

Many people are probably familiar with the standard classification of appliances which plug into mains:
Class I: The transformer (and primary-secondary isolation barrier, in general) incorporates a single mean of protection against electric shock. A protective earth wire connection to output negative (and the metal enclosure, if there is one) forms two means of protection.
Class II: Two means of protection directly built into the insulation between primary and secondary, thereby making the Earth wire unnecessary to meet global safety standards.

These days, the vast majority of switching power supplies, are designed with "double insulated" transformers, as triple-insulated wire (TIW) has made it possible to design a double-insulated transformer which is hardly any bigger than a hypothetical equivalent single-insulated version.

So the question is: If you attach an earth wire to the output negative in a power supply which has a Class II insulation rating (based on transformer construction and other creepages/clearances), what class does the power supply become? Class I? Still Class II?

The company I work for calls it Class I, but my problem with that is: Class I implies an inherent need for the earth conductor to be safe. By my logic, the addition of the earth wire should only make the power supply more safe. If I dare say, I might even call it a "triple insulated" power supply in this configuration. Am I wrong? Is it somehow possible that defeating the earth isolation somehow degrades the power supply to a true Class I designation?

It's interesting that, for the most stringent medical applications, earthed power supplies are not allowed, and in fact, must be floating. (These classifications are called Type-BF, for body floating and Type-CF, for cardiac floating.) The medical standard IEC60601 notes that earthing a patient (via power supply earth connection) opens up the possibility that an unintended external voltage could be applied to the patient, causing a current to flow through the body to earth.

Anyone have any experience with this?

Thanks,
Tim
 

Offline MagicSmoker

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1408
  • Country: us
Re: Output Earthing of SMPS and Appliance Class (I or II)
« Reply #1 on: January 22, 2020, 11:33:02 pm »
Earthing the secondary of a Class II power supply does not change its classification back to Class I. After all, the device being powered by a Class II supply could itself be earthed (intentionally or incidentally), and if this could change its classification then Class II wouldn't be a thing in the first place (or, conversely, every device would require the power supply be built into it).

 
The following users thanked this post: TimNJ

Online TimNJTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1720
  • Country: us
Re: Output Earthing of SMPS and Appliance Class (I or II)
« Reply #2 on: January 23, 2020, 05:06:21 am »
Thanks a lot. That is a solid example to prove the point. Another guy is trying to say that connecting output neg to mains earth voids some protection because it is now "connected to the mains supply"...but the logic there doesn't really hold, because in a true Class I system, the earth connection is added as an extra safety provision, so how could it have some opposite effect here?

I think it's important to remember that the earth terminal on a mains output is less part of the mains "supply" and more a convenient way to connect to the physical earth.
 

Offline Someone

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5155
  • Country: au
    • send complaints here
Re: Output Earthing of SMPS and Appliance Class (I or II)
« Reply #3 on: January 23, 2020, 07:01:14 am »
Earthing the secondary of a Class II power supply does not change its classification back to Class I.
This depends on where and how the earthing is done.
Quote from: IEC
If the equipment with double insulation or reinforced insulation throughout has an earthing terminal or earthing contact, it is considered to be of Class I construction
http://std.iec.ch/terms/terms.nsf/3385f156e728849bc1256e8c00278ad2/767c9cffaa8610d8c12577ac00499ce8?OpenDocument
Generally if the mains inlet is an IEC C14 (and its connected to something???) thats immediately Class I, even if there are no accessible parts that have continuity back through to it.
 

Offline MagicSmoker

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1408
  • Country: us
Re: Output Earthing of SMPS and Appliance Class (I or II)
« Reply #4 on: January 23, 2020, 11:14:47 am »
http://std.iec.ch/terms/terms.nsf/3385f156e728849bc1256e8c00278ad2/767c9cffaa8610d8c12577ac00499ce8?OpenDocument
Generally if the mains inlet is an IEC C14 (and its connected to something???) thats immediately Class I, even if there are no accessible parts that have continuity back through to it.

Huh... Just when you think regulations can't get any more stupid you see something like this. I'd definitely check with your safety agency testing lab on this one - I do design power supplies and motor drives but nothing that could even remotely qualify as Class II (or SELV, etc.) - and my understanding is that Class II prescribes a set of construction techniques that allow you to avoid earth grounding, not prohibit you from earth grounding. Footnote 2 in the above link does seem to suggest the very opposite, however.

 

Online TimNJTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1720
  • Country: us
Re: Output Earthing of SMPS and Appliance Class (I or II)
« Reply #5 on: January 23, 2020, 04:05:18 pm »
From IEC 62257-7-1 (linked to above):

Quote
NOTE 2 If the equipment with double insulation or reinforced insulation throughout has an earthing terminal or earthing contact, it is considered to be of Class I construction.

From IEC 60601-1 (Medical safety):

Quote
CLASS II: Term referring to electrical equipment in which protection against electric shock does not rely on BASIC INSULATION only, but in which additional safety precautions such as DOUBLE INSULATION or REINFORCED INSULATION are provided, there being no provision for protective earthing or reliance upon installation conditions
NOTE 1 See Figure 4.
NOTE 2 CLASS II equipment can be provided with a FUNCTIONAL EARTH TERMINAL or a FUNCTIONAL EARTH CONDUCTOR. See also 8.6.8 and 8.6.9.

They don't even want you to have a provision for protective earthing? I really want to know the logic here.

Also from IEC 60601 (Medical safety):

Quote
Subclause 3.35 – FUNCTIONAL EARTH TERMINAL
In ME EQUIPMENT, functional earth connections can be made by means of a FUNCTIONAL EARTH TERMINAL that is accessible to the OPERATOR. Alternatively this standard also allows a functional earth connection for CLASS II ME EQUIPMENT via a green and yellow conductor in a POWER SUPPLY CORD. In this case the parts to which this conductor is connected cannot be ACCESSIBLE PARTS (see 8.6.9), and have to be insulated from ACCESSIBLE PARTS.

This standard assumes equipment will fall under Class I, where second mean of protection is derived from earth connection, Class II with no earth connection and double insulated barrier, and Class II with Functional Earth, where an earth connection serves a purpose which is not for protection against shock (most probably something with EMI or immunity). The above seems to say, "Once the earth conductor becomes user accessible (tied to chassis or output negative), then it's no longer Class II equipment"...why?? I don't get it.

Thanks all.
 

Online ejeffrey

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4034
  • Country: us
Re: Output Earthing of SMPS and Appliance Class (I or II)
« Reply #6 on: January 23, 2020, 05:00:38 pm »
Probably a leakage current restriction.  If two devices with ground referenced output are connected to each other or to a structural ground you can get ground current flowing between them regardless of the insulation on the line voltage.  It is low voltage, but for medical standards that might not matter.
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf