Author Topic: Photodiodes saturating in ambient light  (Read 7228 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline tggzzz

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 21227
  • Country: gb
  • Numbers, not adjectives
    • Having fun doing more, with less
Re: Photodiodes saturating in ambient light
« Reply #25 on: May 12, 2020, 01:19:06 pm »
You could try a polarizing filter in front of the receiver, those filter out ambient stray light very efficient. I can't tell if all lasers are polarized in general or you need to arrange the laser in a specific orientation, could you work with that?

A neutral density filter with an attenuation of 10dB will filter out exactly as much ambient light as a 10dB polarising filter. It will only make a large difference if the ambient light is polarised in one appropriately - which is unlikely.
There are lies, damned lies, statistics - and ADC/DAC specs.
Glider pilot's aphorism: "there is no substitute for span". Retort: "There is a substitute: skill+imagination. But you can buy span".
Having fun doing more, with less
 
The following users thanked this post: aussie_laser_dude

Offline aussie_laser_dudeTopic starter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 46
  • Country: au
Re: Photodiodes saturating in ambient light
« Reply #26 on: May 12, 2020, 08:28:01 pm »
Quote
You could try a polarizing filter in front of the receiver

Polarisers are a nice idea, yes lasers are highly polarised and ambient light usually is not. Unfortunately it's not easy to implement in this particular design where polarisation angle and detector orientation are constantly changing. No big loss though, an optical bandpass filter and a high pass ac filter will give pretty impressive results. Simple photodiodes with an ac filter without optical filtering is already giving very clean waveforms as seen in the pics, they're just too small (~5mV100mV) for the adc to read, needs amplification.

  I'm a noob at circuit design, can get my head around bjt / op amp part selection but can't understand mathematically or intuitively how to select the right transformer and load resistor?
« Last Edit: May 14, 2020, 06:36:13 am by aussie_laser_dude »
 

Online twospoons

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 270
  • Country: nz
Re: Photodiodes saturating in ambient light
« Reply #27 on: May 13, 2020, 12:11:07 am »
Could I get some help with understanding twospoons small pulse transformer photovoltaic circuit in "reply 16". Transformers scare me, I don't understand transformer details very well.


I'm a noob at circuit design, can get my head around bjt / op amp part selection but can't understand mathematically or intuitively how to select the right transformer and load resistor?
This is a great opportunity for self-learning, and those should never be passed by  ;D

1. Think about this as a current transformer and everything becomes much clearer. In fact its really important to think of this whole thing in terms of a signal current.
2. 1:1 will work just fine. Construction should be done using bifilar winding for best coupling. The core can be very small - but should ideally have an airgap to avoid saturation. The core I used was a 6mm potcore - really tiny.
3. You really want to feed into a low impedance to get the bandwidth up, think about amplifying current, rather than voltage. The conversion to a voltage signal can be done later. The transimpedance circuit I posted does this.
4. Driving into a low impedance means the voltage across the the diode changes very little, which is good because you are then not trying to charge the self capacitance of the diode, which would otherwise reduce the signal.
5. Choose a reasonably high frequency ferrite for the core. Something intended for pulse transformers, or RF inductors or filters. Something like 4C65 or 4B2 would probably work well (Ferroxcube types - there will be equivalents from other manufacturers

As I mentioned in the first post - ignore the resistor values posted, they are just placeholder values and are not correct.

If you haven't already, its worth studying the photodiode equivalent circuit:


« Last Edit: May 13, 2020, 12:15:04 am by twospoons »
 
The following users thanked this post: aussie_laser_dude

Offline T3sl4co1l

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 22436
  • Country: us
  • Expert, Analog Electronics, PCB Layout, EMC
    • Seven Transistor Labs
Re: Photodiodes saturating in ambient light
« Reply #28 on: May 13, 2020, 12:19:45 am »
Could I get some help with understanding twospoons small pulse transformer photovoltaic circuit in "reply 16". Transformers scare me, I don't understand transformer details very well.

My understanding is the transformer will have a limited bandwidth, I have no idea how to calculate transformer properties and load resistor R1 that will give a bandwidth of say >3 MHz for the photovoltaic photodiode.

Could R1 be changed from 1 Kohm to 10 Kohm without ruining the circuit bandwidth? My reasoning is that the large DC current from the photodiode won't be passing through the R1 resistor, so we can use a higher value resistor to get a higher potential difference. I'm worried this will sacrifice the bandwidth of the transformer or photovoltaic photodiode, but I'm too dumb to understand how to figure this out. I have no idea of the math. If anyone has a good link that explains these properties of transformers I'd love to have a look.

Also, could a 1:4 transformer be used, ie. 1mV AC in and 4mV ac out on other side? Would a transformer like this ruin the bandwidth somehow? Is it better to stick to 1:1 transformers?

Thanks for any help

No, actually you probably want a lower impedance to keep bandwidth higher.

Transformers also have a characteristic impedance, which should be matched for best results.  It may not need to be -- say if you have enough excess bandwidth that you're limited by other constraints in the circuit, like PD capacitance.

Roughly speaking, you can calculate the bandwidth of the photodiode by its capacitance, and the load resistance:
F_H = 1 / (2 pi R C)
This is a lowpass cutoff, so that you can't expect to get much gain at frequencies above this (indeed, the gain will be dropping ~asymptotically with rising frequency, i.e. -20dB/dec), and gain will be flat below.

This is a good reason to employ PD bias: the capacitance drops maybe 3x or more under bias, therefore increasing bandwidth by as much.  (Again, if you don't need it, it's okay not to, as in twospoons's case.)

The transformer, conversely, has a highpass cutoff:
F_L = R / (2 pi L)

F_H and F_L seem to be named backwards, huh?  Well, H is the higher (upper) cutoff, and L the lower.  F_H > F_L.  The upper cutoff has a lowpass characteristic, and the lower has a highpass characteristic.  "Pass" vs. "cut" terminology I guess.

The transformer also has another kind of cutoff: the series attenuating effect of leakage inductance (LL), and the parallel shunting effect of parasitic capacitance (Cp).  More generally, it has impedance and length -- it's wound from wire, after all, and wire has impedance and [electrical] length -- delay.  This too is a lowpass characteristic, so manifests as another F_H in the system.  You generally want this higher than needed; and, this shouldn't be hard to achieve at these modest frequencies.

Example: suppose your system resistance is 1k as shown (note that he just put in default values to show the connection, with no intent of these being real values!).  Suppose your photodiode is, oh I don't know, 100pF say.  100pF and 1kohm rolls off at F_H = 1.59MHz.

To get a bandwidth from say 10kHz to 1.59MHz, you need a transformer that gives F_L at most that, and that has small enough LL and Cp that its cutoff exceeds 1.59MHz.  This needs,
L = 15.9mH
LL << 100uH
Cp << 100pF

As it turns out, LL will be the easy one; more likely ~1uH will be seen.  Cp however is easily taken up by a few meters of wire windings, so you will prefer a hi-mu core (typically ferrite or nanocrystalline) with a fairly thick cross section, so as to maximize winding inductance (L) while minimizing wire length (which corresponds to LL and Cp).  Thick toroids, pot cores and other shapes are typical options.  Twisted pair wire is probably fine.

Note that a transformer isn't needed at all, if you don't need isolation!  You can simply use an inductor of, right about 15.9mH, in parallel with the photodiode, to set the high pass cutoff without needing a transformer at all.


Step-up:
Certainly, you can get ratios from a transformer!  Or again, if isolation isn't necessary, it can be an autoformer, which is nice to save a few turns.

We're still limited by the same resistance * capacitance at the photodiode.  Transformers with high impedance secondaries also get much harder to construct -- impedance goes as turns ratio squared, but Cp doesn't drop, indeed it tends to keep going up (with wire length).  So the transformer bandwidth gets worse as you go in this direction.  More than a few kohms at this bandwidth is actually challenging.

To what end, do you need the impedance matched, anyway?  Surely if the impedance is simply low to begin with, you would use a lower impedance amplifier as well?  Say, an op-amp with rather beefy inputs that gives refreshingly low e_n (nV/rtHz) but annoyingly high i_n (~pA/rtHz?), or a discrete low-noise amplifier or purchased module that is best suited to quite low impedances, say 50 ohms.  Indeed you might get better performance (lower noise and higher bandwidth) this way, than with a transformer ratio up to a more jellybean (TL072??) amplifier.

The gold standard for photodiodes of course is a low noise transimpedance amplifier; this is just an amplifier configuration that best suits the diode's properties.  It's best used when placed as near to the diode as possible, i.e., with no transformer or connecting cables delaying its response.

I guess that low noise isn't actually a high priority here, as your signal is fairly strong (a direct laser beam I guess?), and you don't seem to care about ambient noise sources; or maybe you just aren't to the stage where it matters yet.  (Sunlight may be fairly stable, but is subject to fading*, and ambient sources (fluorescents, LEDs; even incandescents to a lesser degree!) often fluctuate at mains frequency.)

*Fading is the radio-frequency effect of speckling or twinkling transmissions and reflections.  In the shortwave band it manifests as ionospheric layers moving about, and what's fading is the signal, which comes and goes over time, sometimes pretty deeply (+/- 10dB or more).  The same thing works optically with diffraction (twinkling stars!), speckle (coherent (laser) reflection from disorderly surfaces?) and so on.  Plus the more obvious influences to sunlight: clouds casting shadows, cars shining reflections through windows, etc.

Tim
Seven Transistor Labs, LLC
Electronic design, from concept to prototype.
Bringing a project to life?  Send me a message!
 
The following users thanked this post: aussie_laser_dude

Online twospoons

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 270
  • Country: nz
Re: Photodiodes saturating in ambient light
« Reply #29 on: May 13, 2020, 12:28:03 am »

Polarisers are a nice idea, yes lasers are highly polarised and ambient light usually is not. Unfortunately it's not easy to implement in this particular design where polarisation angle and detector orientation are constantly changing.

The solution there is a circular polarizer, which should work well given the narrow linewidth of a typical laser. Just remember that reflection will reverse the handedness of the polarization.
 
The following users thanked this post: aussie_laser_dude

Offline aussie_laser_dudeTopic starter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 46
  • Country: au
Re: Photodiodes saturating in ambient light
« Reply #30 on: May 13, 2020, 08:34:15 am »
Quote
Roughly speaking, you can calculate the bandwidth of the photodiode by its capacitance, and the load resistance:
F_H = 1 / (2 pi R C) .......

This is a good reason to employ PD bias: the capacitance drops maybe 3x or more under bias....

F_H = 1/(2*pi*1kohm*25pF) = 6MHz (25pf capacitance @ 3V) vs 2MHz (70pF capacitance @ 0V photovoltaic mode).

Looks like the ~1 kohm resistor that guys here have suggested is a pretty good value to use with this photodiode.

Quote
1. Think about this as a current transformer and everything becomes much clearer. In fact its really important to think of this whole thing in terms of a signal current.

hmm, I think I understand things a little, for equal magnetic flux change between the two transformer coils you'll need an equal current change (for 1:1 case), so on secondary coil we'll have our standard V = IR resistor load electronics happening which we can amplify by whatever method.

Quote
The solution there is a circular polarizer, which should work well given the narrow linewidth of a typical laser.

I've actually done something kind of similar in the past, pulsed laser + circular polarizer + wollaston prism with dual balanced photodetectors + lockin amplifier (and other stuff) for detecting incredibly small changes in light polarization. Was pretty good for measurement of sub ps electronics. It is a rare and pleasant surprise to now be measuring a raw signal that can be displayed on an oscilloscope and not be buried in the noise, this is a luxury indeed  :D.

It's going to take a few days for me to comprehend all of this stuff in detail, but decided to give a crack at a simple design with light/current/voltage calculations and stuff. Op amps sound like a good idea to me, the high input impedance makes them a bit easier to understand ;D, an npn BJT amplifier design will take me another day to learn.

If there's anyone out there who likes to criticize designs, here's a good opportunity. There's got to be a really obvious, really dumb and really wrong mistake in the attached photo...
 

Offline Siwastaja

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 9336
  • Country: fi
Re: Photodiodes saturating in ambient light
« Reply #31 on: May 13, 2020, 10:59:08 am »
IMHO, don't waste time on polarizing filter, you may be able to get some (like maybe 2-3x?) of extra signal-to-ambient ratio out of it, but with a simple bandpass filter you easily get 20-30x!

Yes, laser is heavily polarized and ambient light mostly isn't, but laser is also a small peak in wavelength, which ambient is not. The latter feature is easier to extract a lot of benefit out of it. If you want to use polarization to perform attenuation of ambient, the physical alignment of source and measurement becomes critical.
 
The following users thanked this post: aussie_laser_dude

Online twospoons

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 270
  • Country: nz
Re: Photodiodes saturating in ambient light
« Reply #32 on: May 13, 2020, 11:23:00 pm »

If there's anyone out there who likes to criticize designs, here's a good opportunity. There's got to be a really obvious, really dumb and really wrong mistake in the attached photo...

Ah, yeah. The 30M resistor is ridiculously high and will cause you nothing but trouble. Scale everything back by 100x, or use a T-network of more reasonable values.

Also you can do this with just one opamp and one resistor. And this will get you your best bandwidth.
- neg input is set up as a virtual earth, so any current in the secondary of the transformer will be forced (by the opamp) to flow in R1.  So VOUT = I x R1  : thats your transimpedance gain equation.
- The tfr secondary sees a very low impedance, which is what you want for best bandwidth.

You will note this is the same as your circuit topology, but with R2 set to zero. R1 becomes unnecessary, as it is 'shorted' by the virtual earth.  Remember this is a current signal.

You dont actually have to use a transformer - an inductor will do too.
« Last Edit: May 13, 2020, 11:43:48 pm by twospoons »
 
The following users thanked this post: aussie_laser_dude

Offline StillTrying

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2850
  • Country: se
  • Country: Broken Britain
Re: Photodiodes saturating in ambient light
« Reply #33 on: May 13, 2020, 11:47:02 pm »
How much current does the laser produce from the photodiode, your 5mV with a 1k load suggests only a 5uA change, that seems very low, I'd expect (hope :)) for 10 to 20 times that.

How much current does the ambient light produce from the photodiode.

With a few numbers on the wanted and unwanted current values it's quite possible to simulate photodiode circuits reasonably accurately.
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/projects/charge-sensitive-amplifier-for-photomultiplier/msg2871826/#msg2871826

How is the timing of the 10us light pulse produced, by the laser crossing the PD, or a 10us electronic on-time.
If it's a 10us 'laser turned on time', the 10us signal from the PD should be very square, because there's enough bandwidth.

Why do the pulses have to be 10us wide, I'd probably go for a bit less to make it a bit easier to separate the pulses from fast unwanted ambient light changes such as reflections off a shiny object, but I'm only guessing what your final want is. :)
« Last Edit: May 14, 2020, 10:33:29 pm by StillTrying »
.  That took much longer than I thought it would.
 
The following users thanked this post: aussie_laser_dude

Offline aussie_laser_dudeTopic starter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 46
  • Country: au
Re: Photodiodes saturating in ambient light
« Reply #34 on: May 14, 2020, 11:46:42 am »
Quote
How much current does the laser produce from the photodiode, your 5mV with a 1k load suggests only a 5uA change, that seems very low, I'd I expect(hope :)) for 10 to 20 times that.
  Well spotted! I've fixed the incorrect value, 5mV was due to forgetting the x10 scope probe attenuation |O. It's currently ~100mV for 0.2mW laser light for both experiment and theoretical calculations (only part of the 1mW beam will strike the 2mm wide array given laser beam width).

Quote
How much current does the ambient light produce from the photodiode.

  See my Reply #30 attachment. Even with a $100 optical bandpass filter sunlight is still ~3x higher than the laser, this is better than the 50x ratio without the filter. A UV laser would have been a good choice since sunlight photon flux is low at that wavelength but I suppose it's nice having a laser that can be seen. btw I'm impressed at the deductive skills of some individuals here, too many smart people haha :-X

Quote
- The tfr secondary sees a very low impedance, which is what you want for best bandwidth.
OMG... Witchcraft! I had no idea op amps could amplify a current directly. I'll need to study transimpedance amplifiers in detail. I would have thought the current in the secondary coil is being forced through a very high resistance load, but apparently it just goes around the op amp. My mind is blown.

Didn't realize the complexity on op amp design, all kinds of noises and special circuitry tricks, could spend days learning the absolute basics (pretty interesting though!).

Quote
You dont actually have to use a transformer - an inductor will do too.
1. I need to get over my fear of transformers and grow as an individual
2. I suspect that a slow changing background light source over ms will be filtered better by a transformer. My thoughts are that the inductor will take time to change from one DC current to another when a shadow passes the detector causing some "leaked dc" into the amplifier over milliseconds?

Anyway, I think that's the two subgoals reached! Got a photodiode circuit that will work in the sun and got a pre-ADC amplifier. Cheers guys! Thanks heaps twospoons for the help with different designs! Will have to re-read some posts to understand everything. 

« Last Edit: May 14, 2020, 12:03:18 pm by aussie_laser_dude »
 

Offline tggzzz

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 21227
  • Country: gb
  • Numbers, not adjectives
    • Having fun doing more, with less
Re: Photodiodes saturating in ambient light
« Reply #35 on: May 14, 2020, 12:28:07 pm »
OMG... Witchcraft! I had no idea op amps could amplify a current directly. I'll need to study transimpedance amplifiers in detail. I would have thought the current in the secondary coil is being forced through a very high resistance load, but apparently it just goes around the op amp.

The way to think about voltage opamps[1] (in the normal operating regime) is that the output will perform gymnastics to keep the two inputs at the same voltage, and that no current goes into the opamp.

So if you have an inverting amp, all the current through the input resistor goes through the feedback resistor. If there is no input resistor, any current (e.g. from a photodiode) still goes through the feedback resistor. The gain is then measured in units of Vout/Iin.

I would still consider reverse biassing your photodiode, to reduce capacitance and increase linearity (if that matters). If you can choose amplifier gain and power supply so that you get adequate signal output without the ambient light saturating the amplifier, I'd consider omitting the transformer and AC coupling the amplifier's output to the next stage.

[1]Current feedback opamps are a different kettle of fish, with differing advantages and disadvantages. They are not relevant to your problem.
There are lies, damned lies, statistics - and ADC/DAC specs.
Glider pilot's aphorism: "there is no substitute for span". Retort: "There is a substitute: skill+imagination. But you can buy span".
Having fun doing more, with less
 
The following users thanked this post: aussie_laser_dude

Online NiHaoMike

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 9322
  • Country: us
  • "Don't turn it on - Take it apart!"
    • Facebook Page
Re: Photodiodes saturating in ambient light
« Reply #36 on: May 14, 2020, 01:37:47 pm »
Also you can do this with just one opamp and one resistor. And this will get you your best bandwidth.
- neg input is set up as a virtual earth, so any current in the secondary of the transformer will be forced (by the opamp) to flow in R1.  So VOUT = I x R1  : thats your transimpedance gain equation.
- The tfr secondary sees a very low impedance, which is what you want for best bandwidth.

You will note this is the same as your circuit topology, but with R2 set to zero. R1 becomes unnecessary, as it is 'shorted' by the virtual earth.  Remember this is a current signal.

You dont actually have to use a transformer - an inductor will do too.
That configuration will magnify the offset voltage of the opamp. Easiest fix for that is to connect the photodiode directly. Then add an integrator and another resistor to cancel out DC.
Cryptocurrency has taught me to love math and at the same time be baffled by it.

Cryptocurrency lesson 0: Altcoins and Bitcoin are not the same thing.
 
The following users thanked this post: aussie_laser_dude

Offline David Hess

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 17428
  • Country: us
  • DavidH
Re: Photodiodes saturating in ambient light
« Reply #37 on: May 14, 2020, 03:01:58 pm »
[1]Current feedback opamps are a different kettle of fish, with differing advantages and disadvantages. They are not relevant to your problem.

They might be relevant.  Current feedback operational amplifiers are used for higher performance transimpedance amplifiers in photodiode applications.
 

Offline tggzzz

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 21227
  • Country: gb
  • Numbers, not adjectives
    • Having fun doing more, with less
Re: Photodiodes saturating in ambient light
« Reply #38 on: May 14, 2020, 04:14:40 pm »
[1]Current feedback opamps are a different kettle of fish, with differing advantages and disadvantages. They are not relevant to your problem.

They might be relevant.  Current feedback operational amplifiers are used for higher performance transimpedance amplifiers in photodiode applications.

I haven't seen that done, and Phil Hobb's book doesn't mention it. But that's a weak argument :)

I think that book will be sufficient for the OP, and give them more than enough to think about.
There are lies, damned lies, statistics - and ADC/DAC specs.
Glider pilot's aphorism: "there is no substitute for span". Retort: "There is a substitute: skill+imagination. But you can buy span".
Having fun doing more, with less
 

Offline StillTrying

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2850
  • Country: se
  • Country: Broken Britain
Re: Photodiodes saturating in ambient light
« Reply #39 on: May 14, 2020, 10:50:28 pm »
Even with a $100 optical bandpass filter sunlight is still ~3x higher than the laser, this is better than the 50x ratio without the filter.

I thought you had only about 5mV of signal on top of 1.5V of ambient, but your signal to noise/ambient is 100 times better than that. :)
50uA of photodiode current signal is quite a lot, even if the ambient is still higher.

Do some simulation. :scared:



The Green plot is simulated photodiode current, 50uA 5us wide pulses on top of 0 to 400uA of ambient changing at 1kHz.
The Yellow plot is attempting to separate the pulses from the changing ambient by the AC coupled method.
The Red plot is using an inductor method.
The last three are close ups of the first three.
I don't know how to do simulated transformer versions.
« Last Edit: May 14, 2020, 10:59:11 pm by StillTrying »
.  That took much longer than I thought it would.
 

Online twospoons

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 270
  • Country: nz
Re: Photodiodes saturating in ambient light
« Reply #40 on: May 15, 2020, 12:17:16 am »

That configuration will magnify the offset voltage of the opamp. Easiest fix for that is to connect the photodiode directly. Then add an integrator and another resistor to cancel out DC.

Yes it will, but its fairly easy to pick a low offset opamp and/or add offset trimming. At least it will be fairly constant, unlike the ambient induced DC offset.  Or simply live with it, by splitting the amplification into several AC coupled stages.

Now we're heading into the 'art' side of engineering: one problem with multiple solutions.
 

Offline aussie_laser_dudeTopic starter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 46
  • Country: au
Re: Photodiodes saturating in ambient light
« Reply #41 on: May 15, 2020, 03:21:46 am »
oh snap....  :'(

Yeah I didn't give much thought to the dc top of the square wave pulses being filtered out, (with hindsight) that's obviously going to be removed with a high pass filter. oops lol.

Art hat on:
Option A)
Take two signals,
1. raw photodiode signal
2. a slow changing filtered signal made via a cap / inductor to measure ambient light
Then subtract them and amplify using an op amp to get square wave pulses with removed ambient DC current.

Option B)
Feed the highpass filtered signal into an amplifying & integrating op amp, that'll reconstruct the square waves with no dc offset i think? This approach sounds fun (oh, NiHaoMike already had a similar, probably better idea that I missed)
 
« Last Edit: May 15, 2020, 03:28:05 am by aussie_laser_dude »
 

Online twospoons

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 270
  • Country: nz
Re: Photodiodes saturating in ambient light
« Reply #42 on: May 15, 2020, 05:54:36 am »
Yeah I didn't give much thought to the dc top of the square wave pulses being filtered out, (with hindsight) that's obviously going to be removed with a high pass filter. oops lol.

wait .. what?

What squarewave pulses?

If you want to pass a squarewave, and block DC, you want a highpass filter - with a cutoff below the fundamental of the squarewave. Its all the higher harmonics that make it square and flat across the top.
 

Offline nfmax

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1624
  • Country: gb
Re: Photodiodes saturating in ambient light
« Reply #43 on: May 15, 2020, 07:43:33 am »
IMHO, don't waste time on polarizing filter, you may be able to get some (like maybe 2-3x?) of extra signal-to-ambient ratio out of it, but with a simple bandpass filter you easily get 20-30x!

Yes, laser is heavily polarized and ambient light mostly isn't, but laser is also a small peak in wavelength, which ambient is not. The latter feature is easier to extract a lot of benefit out of it. If you want to use polarization to perform attenuation of ambient, the physical alignment of source and measurement becomes critical.

I suspect the OP is well aware, but others may not be, of the fact that a narrow-band dielectric optical filter will only give the desired response for light incident normally on its surface. The sunlight may come from any direction, which may give problems. But it sounds like you have so many wanted photons, even the shot noise from the sunlight isn't a big issue. Luxury!


P.S. Get a copy of Phill Hobbs' book. A third edition is in preparation and may be published this year, but I wouldn't wait
 

Offline tggzzz

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 21227
  • Country: gb
  • Numbers, not adjectives
    • Having fun doing more, with less
Re: Photodiodes saturating in ambient light
« Reply #44 on: May 15, 2020, 08:01:21 am »
I realised nobody has posted a link to Phil Hobb's site on this thread. 18 hours ago I posted the info below on another thread on the same topic...

You should invest in Phil Hobbs' book https://www.electrooptical.net/Building_ElectroOptical_Systems/

Alternatively, if you can ask a good and interesting question which doesn't look like you are merely after free consultancy, he may respond on usenet group sci.electronics.design.
There are lies, damned lies, statistics - and ADC/DAC specs.
Glider pilot's aphorism: "there is no substitute for span". Retort: "There is a substitute: skill+imagination. But you can buy span".
Having fun doing more, with less
 

Offline aussie_laser_dudeTopic starter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 46
  • Country: au
Re: Photodiodes saturating in ambient light
« Reply #45 on: May 15, 2020, 08:46:03 am »
Quote
I realised nobody has posted a link to Phil Hobb's site on this thread. 18 hours ago I posted the info below on another thread on the same topic...
That's pretty tempting, the contents convinced me to get it, then i saw the price. Still tempted though. I'm sure it's worth it.

Quote
I suspect the OP is well aware, but others may not be, of the fact that a narrow-band dielectric optical filter will only give the desired response for light incident normally on its surface. The sunlight may come from any direction, which may give problems.
Yeah it's crossed my mind, too many unknowns at this stage to know for sure if it'll work or not (maximum incidence angle, thickness and properties of dielectric layers etc) so might as well just buy it and see if it helps.
[Edit: Might be getting a bit iffy past the 30 deg mark...

Quote
If you want to pass a squarewave, and block DC, you want a highpass filter - with a cutoff below the fundamental of the squarewave. Its all the higher harmonics that make it square and flat across the top.
I want to keep the squarewave pulses (well kinda squarish shaped pulses) and remove the slow changing ambient background. StillTrying's simulation shows that an inductor / capacitor can be used to make a high pass filter, but it "splits" the pulse into a positive and negative peak which is unwanted.
   I'll need to think about the harmonics twospoons mentioned. My op amps just arrived in the mail a few hours ago so I can start toying with them and try to figure this one out, should be fun.

I really want that book...


« Last Edit: May 15, 2020, 11:14:52 am by aussie_laser_dude »
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf