Author Topic: Possibly wrong marking on a chip from Ali?  (Read 2838 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline MitiTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1405
  • Country: ca
Possibly wrong marking on a chip from Ali?
« on: February 09, 2020, 08:28:06 pm »
I bought 5 chips from Aliexpress that were supposed to be MC12080, a 1.1GHz prescaller, this is the link to Ali:

https://www.aliexpress.com/item/4000301840060.html?spm=a2g0o.productlist.0.0.182362b3xmZHgC&algo_pvid=fe62791f-50cf-469e-bb2a-1c8a9f60d0a4&algo_expid=fe62791f-50cf-469e-bb2a-1c8a9f60d0a4-29&btsid=e57581f6-eb8f-48be-8922-383ef52909b8&ws_ab_test=searchweb0_0,searchweb201602_10,searchweb201603_55

 and this is the link to the datasheet:

https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/data-sheet/MC12080.pdf

The chip functional table shows divide ratios of 10, 20, 40 and 80. The chips that I received seem to have the correct pinout, but they only divide by 2, 4 and 8.
With SW1 - SW3 open, I get a ratio of 8, either SW1 or SW2 high the ratio is 4 and with both SW1 and SW2 high, the ratio is 2. SW3 does nothing.
The chips have Freescale logo on them.
I was expecting that the chips either work or they don't work, but to somewhat work? Or maybe that's why they are sold on Ali, otherwise they would be on Digikey?
Can you think of any other chip that can follow the logic described before? I tried 2 of 5 and they work the same.

Edit: One more clue that they may be different chip inside, the supply current at 5V is 7mA compared to 3.7mA typical in the datasheet.
Edit1: Pin 7 that was supposed to be SW3 seems to be an active low shut down. Connected to GND, the output goes high and the supply current goes down to 4mA.

Thanks in advance!
« Last Edit: February 09, 2020, 08:38:58 pm by Miti »
Fear does not stop death, it stops life.
 

Online wraper

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 17952
  • Country: lv
Re: Possibly wrong marking on a chip from Ali?
« Reply #1 on: February 09, 2020, 08:31:59 pm »
Most likely MC12093 with fake marking. https://www.onsemi.com/pub/Collateral/MC12093-D.PDF
 
The following users thanked this post: Miti, thm_w

Offline MitiTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1405
  • Country: ca
Re: Possibly wrong marking on a chip from Ali?
« Reply #2 on: February 09, 2020, 08:48:12 pm »
Yes, that must be it, thanks!

Why would they do that? Digikey price is the same for both chips.
There's something wrong with the chips, other than the marking. SB current should be 50uA, in my case it is 4mA. Little big difference.
I've already opened a refund request with Ali.
Fear does not stop death, it stops life.
 

Offline magic

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7453
  • Country: pl
Re: Possibly wrong marking on a chip from Ali?
« Reply #3 on: February 09, 2020, 09:03:45 pm »
Maybe somebody cloned the /2~/8 divider but no one cloned the /20~/80 variant yet ;)
 

Online wraper

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 17952
  • Country: lv
Re: Possibly wrong marking on a chip from Ali?
« Reply #4 on: February 09, 2020, 10:17:41 pm »
There's something wrong with the chips, other than the marking. SB current should be 50uA, in my case it is 4mA. Little big difference.
Might be crappy clone of MC12093. Or you are measuring wrong. Try connecting input to GND and leaving output unconnected.
 

Online wraper

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 17952
  • Country: lv
Re: Possibly wrong marking on a chip from Ali?
« Reply #5 on: February 09, 2020, 10:19:11 pm »
Quote
Why would they do that?
Because they sell what sells well at the time. They can literally "make" what was asked. I've once received Toshiba stepper driver IC re-marked as other. Using such would result in guaranteed magic smoke.
 

Offline Leo Bodnar

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 820
  • Country: gb
Re: Possibly wrong marking on a chip from Ali?
« Reply #6 on: February 09, 2020, 10:24:12 pm »
Does it work all the way to 1.4GHz?
Leo

Offline MitiTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1405
  • Country: ca
Re: Possibly wrong marking on a chip from Ali?
« Reply #7 on: February 09, 2020, 11:21:07 pm »
There's something wrong with the chips, other than the marking. SB current should be 50uA, in my case it is 4mA. Little big difference.
Might be crappy clone of MC12093. Or you are measuring wrong. Try connecting input to GND and leaving output unconnected.

Yes, it goes down to 2mA, that's the lowest I can get.
Fear does not stop death, it stops life.
 

Offline MitiTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1405
  • Country: ca
Re: Possibly wrong marking on a chip from Ali?
« Reply #8 on: February 09, 2020, 11:48:24 pm »
Does it work all the way to 1.4GHz?
Leo

The datasheet looks funny. Shouldn't be Typ 1.1GHz and Max 1.4GHz? Anyway, here are the results for the upper limit of the frequency:

Input level      Max freq.
0+ dBm          2.1GHz :clap:
-5 dBm           1.8GHz
-10 dBm         1.2GHz
-15 dBm         1GHz

Fear does not stop death, it stops life.
 
The following users thanked this post: thm_w

Offline graybeard

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 443
  • Country: us
  • Consulting III-V RF/mixed signal/device engineer
    • Chris Grossman
Re: Possibly wrong marking on a chip from Ali?
« Reply #9 on: February 11, 2020, 04:31:42 pm »
It’s done because there is money to be made with counterfeit chips.  Check out these videos









« Last Edit: February 12, 2020, 05:35:46 pm by graybeard »
 

Online thm_w

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7522
  • Country: ca
  • Non-expert
Re: Possibly wrong marking on a chip from Ali?
« Reply #10 on: February 12, 2020, 01:55:53 am »
Luckily you didn't get this one, apparently an optocoupler: https://www.aliexpress.com/item/4000118105223.html

There is one more source here, with different silkscreen: https://www.aliexpress.com/item/4000358826445.html

You can get for sure genuine ones for $1.10 each, but they are salvaged. So, I don't expect prices for new chips to be much less than that.

What are you using the chip for?
Profile -> Modify profile -> Look and Layout ->  Don't show users' signatures
 

Offline EEEnthusiast

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 381
  • Country: in
  • RF boards, Precision Analog, Carpentry
    • https://www.zscircuits.in/
Re: Possibly wrong marking on a chip from Ali?
« Reply #11 on: February 12, 2020, 03:02:52 am »
I know from first experience on some of the production facility in china for ICs. For e.g. if a semicon fab is making an IC , say for Microchip 93LC46B. If they figure out that the parts are selling in large volumes, they would start an alternate production unit for this. Those units would NOT be delivered to microchip, but to the local market for assembly. When they leave the semicon fab, these ICs would be un-marked, in order to protect IP issues and other legal clauses. Once in the local market, these would be screen printed or laser etched with the part number and Microchip logo. It then ends up in the assembly units when these parts are requested by some one who is assembling a board. Now in this case Microchip does not make any money as the product never comes from Microchip. But the end user does not know it because the parts look and function the same as original.

The only problem is when someone in the local market makes a mistake and prints the wrong part number on the blank ICs which came out of the fab. That's what you have got now.
« Last Edit: February 12, 2020, 03:12:00 am by EEEnthusiast »
Making products for IOT
https://www.zscircuits.in/
 

Offline MitiTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1405
  • Country: ca
Re: Possibly wrong marking on a chip from Ali?
« Reply #12 on: February 12, 2020, 04:14:46 am »
What are you using the chip for?

I’m working on a tracking generator for my spectrum analyzer. This was supposed to divide the 300MHz calibration output for the ADF4351 30 MHz reference frequency. This way I don’t need to tap into the 10MHz reference of the SA.

Anyway, apparently they fully refunded the amount. I’ll have to check my card balance.
« Last Edit: February 12, 2020, 04:17:35 am by Miti »
Fear does not stop death, it stops life.
 
The following users thanked this post: thm_w

Offline magic

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7453
  • Country: pl
Re: Possibly wrong marking on a chip from Ali?
« Reply #13 on: February 12, 2020, 07:48:16 am »
The only problem is when someone in the local market makes a mistake and prints the wrong part number on the blank ICs which came out of the fab. That's what you have got now.
I doubt that mistakes are the only reason ;)
 

Offline gbaddeley

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 210
  • Country: au
Re: Possibly wrong marking on a chip from Ali?
« Reply #14 on: February 12, 2020, 08:03:31 am »
I know from first experience on some of the production facility in china for ICs. ... Those units would NOT be delivered to microchip, but to the local market for assembly. When they leave the semicon fab, these ICs would be un-marked, in order to protect IP issues and other legal clauses. Once in the local market, these would be screen printed or laser etched with the part number and Microchip logo. It then ends up in the assembly units when these parts are requested by some one who is assembling a board. Now in this case Microchip does not make any money as the product never comes from Microchip. ...
"protect IP issues and other legal clauses"  What do you mean by this statement?  It looks like IP is being stolen from Microchip and remarketed with non-genuine labelling.
Glenn
 

Offline magic

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7453
  • Country: pl
Re: Possibly wrong marking on a chip from Ali?
« Reply #15 on: February 12, 2020, 08:07:42 am »
To protect their ass from getting sued for trademark infringement or NDA violation ;)
 

Offline EEEnthusiast

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 381
  • Country: in
  • RF boards, Precision Analog, Carpentry
    • https://www.zscircuits.in/
Re: Possibly wrong marking on a chip from Ali?
« Reply #16 on: February 12, 2020, 08:07:49 am »
I know from first experience on some of the production facility in china for ICs. ... Those units would NOT be delivered to microchip, but to the local market for assembly. When they leave the semicon fab, these ICs would be un-marked, in order to protect IP issues and other legal clauses. Once in the local market, these would be screen printed or laser etched with the part number and Microchip logo. It then ends up in the assembly units when these parts are requested by some one who is assembling a board. Now in this case Microchip does not make any money as the product never comes from Microchip. ...
"protect IP issues and other legal clauses"  What do you mean by this statement?  It looks like IP is being stolen from Microchip and remarketed with non-genuine labelling.
For e.g. a worker cannot walk out of the fab with few microchip (or any other company logo) chips and provide it to another vendor. Unmarked chips will create no suspicion when carried and delivered. If caught, then it is very difficult to find out if those parts are smuggled out of the fab. Thus they avoid any legal issue, IP rights etc..
Making products for IOT
https://www.zscircuits.in/
 

Offline EEEnthusiast

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 381
  • Country: in
  • RF boards, Precision Analog, Carpentry
    • https://www.zscircuits.in/
Re: Possibly wrong marking on a chip from Ali?
« Reply #17 on: February 12, 2020, 09:28:40 am »
For e.g. a worker cannot walk out of the fab with few microchip (or any other company logo) chips and provide it to another vendor. Unmarked chips will create no suspicion when carried and delivered. If caught, then it is very difficult to find out if those parts are smuggled out of the fab. Thus they avoid any legal issue, IP rights etc..

And also some companies will do ODM, not just OEM, so the manufacturer actually has a right to sell it elsewhere, just not under that name.
The same applies to technology transfer, such as LRC making transistors for OnSemi, selling them to OnSemi, as well as under their own name.
Yes, that is possibly the way they can sell the same ICs for cheaper than the original manufacturer or distributor.
Making products for IOT
https://www.zscircuits.in/
 

Offline EEEnthusiast

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 381
  • Country: in
  • RF boards, Precision Analog, Carpentry
    • https://www.zscircuits.in/
Re: Possibly wrong marking on a chip from Ali?
« Reply #18 on: February 12, 2020, 09:47:33 am »
Is LCSC considerably cheaper than Digikey. I do not think so. I was comparing some prices of common ICs and I found it to be similar.
Making products for IOT
https://www.zscircuits.in/
 

Online wraper

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 17952
  • Country: lv
Re: Possibly wrong marking on a chip from Ali?
« Reply #19 on: February 12, 2020, 12:11:54 pm »
Is LCSC considerably cheaper than Digikey. I do not think so. I was comparing some prices of common ICs and I found it to be similar.
You were comparing wrong things. If you want exact IC part number from western company it won't be cheaper for many things. But you can save a lot on passives, connectors and equivalent parts. I spread my orders between 6 suppliers to get the best price: LCSC, TME, Maritex, Mouser, Farnell, Digikey.
 

Offline gbaddeley

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 210
  • Country: au
Re: Possibly wrong marking on a chip from Ali?
« Reply #20 on: February 13, 2020, 08:58:51 am »
For e.g. a worker cannot walk out of the fab with few microchip (or any other company logo) chips and provide it to another vendor. Unmarked chips will create no suspicion when carried and delivered. If caught, then it is very difficult to find out if those parts are smuggled out of the fab. Thus they avoid any legal issue, IP rights etc..
You are stating that workers are committing theft and taking measures to avoid getting caught and getting into trouble. I wonder if the major companies for which these chips are being made are aware that this is going on. This activity seems to be quite distinct from legitimate second-sourcing deals that the major company is party. Interesting.
Glenn
 

Offline EEEnthusiast

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 381
  • Country: in
  • RF boards, Precision Analog, Carpentry
    • https://www.zscircuits.in/
Re: Possibly wrong marking on a chip from Ali?
« Reply #21 on: February 15, 2020, 08:24:20 am »
For e.g. a worker cannot walk out of the fab with few microchip (or any other company logo) chips and provide it to another vendor. Unmarked chips will create no suspicion when carried and delivered. If caught, then it is very difficult to find out if those parts are smuggled out of the fab. Thus they avoid any legal issue, IP rights etc..
You are stating that workers are committing theft and taking measures to avoid getting caught and getting into trouble. I wonder if the major companies for which these chips are being made are aware that this is going on. This activity seems to be quite distinct from legitimate second-sourcing deals that the major company is party. Interesting.
I do not think it is the worker initiating and doing this. The contract manufacturing fab managers/owners need to be aware of this. There is not other way for them to get access to the masks needed to build the IC.
Making products for IOT
https://www.zscircuits.in/
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf