| Electronics > Projects, Designs, and Technical Stuff |
| Projects to find the limits of what is possible right now? |
| << < (6/10) > >> |
| coppercone2:
"or extracting proteins from human fecal waste for use in food production, as long as the end result is clean and of acceptable quality for human consumption." If you put that in a resume there is a Boiler Room job waiting for you. Wolf of wall street. Sell me this pen? Fuck that. Sell me this turd. fucking ruthless. man could sell anything. penny stock, contents of a porta potty, whatever. *i would install a lock on my lunch box though |
| ali_asadzadeh:
Nice topic ;), I have a 5 USD wrist watch that's made in china, As soon as I saw it, I told myself if you don't buy it you are stupid and you always think with 5USD you can not do anything. It's so complicated! it's like G-shock brand, with all that mechanical complexities, the material it has used, the effort and the fact that I know it has passed at least 2000Km to Iran and has passed at least 3 people making profit down the line, it would bit the shit out of me what are the pushing limits :) ;) :D ;D :o |O Also I have these Ideas, we need a programming language with the power of C++ and it's ability to use ASM and also ease and wast free libraries of Node. Also some games like the "Ready Player one" |
| SiliconWizard:
--- Quote from: Nominal Animal on January 24, 2019, 08:18:56 pm ---Well, there is nothing inherently wrong in designing a short-lived gadget that barely does what its sales pitch promises. There is also nothing inherently wrong in using human hair to make a soy sauce analog, or extracting proteins from human fecal waste for use in food production, as long as the end result is clean and of acceptable quality for human consumption. --- End quote --- Well, I don't know what is your own definition of "wrong" here, in both cases. I know many philosophers have been debating the concept for centuries. ::) Regarding the shit- and hair-based food (let's call things by their name), wrong or not (whatever that means), that really isn't appealing. ;D As to the design of short-lived gadgets, that tends to promote bad engineering whether you want it or not. I don't know if bad engineering is wrong, but it's certainly bad, as much per se as its consequences (in terms of waste/resource consumption/pollution for instance). |
| Nominal Animal:
--- Quote from: SiliconWizard on January 24, 2019, 09:09:18 pm ---Well, I don't know what is your own definition of "wrong" here, in both cases. --- End quote --- Well, people happily eat pink slime and chicken washed in chlorine at the Lard of the Free, don't they? I don't think chemical extraction of amino acids from any source is any worse, if the end result is clean. |
| cdev:
You should know, this is not a good idea. Human hair is often toxic. People should be aware that its one of the ways people eliminate all sorts of garbage that our bodies need to get rid of. Its contaminated with all sorts of chemicals. You can't feed it to animals, let alone people. --- Quote from: Nominal Animal on January 24, 2019, 08:18:56 pm ---Well, there is nothing inherently wrong in designing a short-lived gadget that barely does what its sales pitch promises. There is also nothing inherently wrong in using human hair to make a soy sauce analog, or extracting proteins from human fecal waste for use in food production, as long as the end result is clean and of acceptable quality for human consumption. --- End quote --- Yes it is, even if its sterilized so its no longer contaminated with all kinds of diseases, bacteria, fungi and parasites, its still going to have a witches brew of heavy metals etc. Heavily skewed to contain the very things the human body most tries to eliminate via its hair follicles. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |