Author Topic: Protecting a Motherboard RGB fets from shorts and over voltage  (Read 608 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline DW1961Topic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 753
  • Country: us
This question was posted in another thread, but it was at the end of a different discussion 3 pages deep.  So I wanted to create a thread specifically for this question.

I want to protect my motherboard's RGB fets from getting smoked by a short or other faults in an RGB strip (non-addressable). The RGB circuit can take up to 2 amps. Would putting in a 2 amp fast blow fuse AFTER the fets protect them, or would they fry too fast for the fuse to help, since it is on the wrong side of the power flow?

So, for example

[motherboard and power flow]--->RGB/FETS/Riser-->12v+ pin-->2amp fuse-->RGB Light strip

The fuse would be on the 12V wire going from the MB's 12+pin to the 12v+ pin of the RGB strip. (It would be really easy to solder up an inline fuse if it would work.).
 

Offline T3sl4co1l

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 22436
  • Country: us
  • Expert, Analog Electronics, PCB Layout, EMC
    • Seven Transistor Labs
Re: Protecting a Motherboard RGB fets from shorts and over voltage
« Reply #1 on: July 14, 2020, 06:52:53 am »
It's a design issue.  They should've used protected FETs, or a current limited driver.  Possibly you can replace what's on the board, but it will require some tools to do well.

As for fixing their shit externally -- yes, a fuse will work BUT it must be faster than a "fuse" fuse.

See, the transistor will die in perhaps 100 microseconds; after that, it's a short circuit, with fault current continuing to heat up both itself and the fuse.  10,000 microseconds later, the fuse finally melts open, suppressing a spark as it goes, and the fault is cleared.

If you could get a fuse fast enough, it would be fine, but I don't think you can get anything quite small enough to protect a 2A transistor.


So that leaves a challenge: either limit current to exactly 2A or less; or limit the fault duration to much less than 100us.  Preferably both.


We can use resistance to limit current, but it's a crude instrument, wasteful.  Example might be, if our load is nominally 100mA at 12V, we can use a (12V / 2A) = 6 ohm series resistor to limit fault current to 2A, while only wasting 6*100m = 600mV = 0.6V in normal operation.  But I'm guessing you want to use a nominal load much closer to the limit, and that's where the resistor becomes wasteful.

Can we do better?  Certainly!  It's not even hard to make an inline current limiting device.  Unfortunately, it's also not trivial, or cheap.

Back in the day, there were current-regulating diodes: you put one in series, and at low currents, they just look like a small resistance, no big deal; going up, eventually the current flattens out; hence the name.  They were only, whatever, a few to tens of mA each (available in graded ranges).  You'd need zillions of them in parallel to limit the current as desired here.  A start, but not a useful one.

A modern equivalent might use a depletion mode power transistor, with a resistor to set the current limit.  This is basically a CRD all over again, but actually available, and a scalable solution.  Trouble is, I can't tell you exactly which parts to use -- the resistor has to be calibrated for the desired current.  And anyway, the device will get quite hot under fault conditions, and either has to be heatsinked to handle that continuously, or another protection circuit has to turn it off entirely to prevent failure.  Back to square one, kind of.

So what might be the best solution is this:

Use the pins as logic levels to drive more substantial, protected switches.  Basically start over, but doing it right.  There may be drop-in modules available for this function, or you can build your own from parts, like these:
https://www.digikey.com/product-detail/en/on-semiconductor/NCV8405ADTRKG/NCV8405ADTRKGOSCT-ND/3195279
You'll probably need a pull-up resistor on the input (I'm assuming the RGB drivers are open-drain type outputs), and a logic inverter, which can be another transistor (MMBT3904 say) and some resistors, or a proper logic inverter like 74HC3G14.  It'll need probably 5V from the motherboard or PSU just to power those resistors really, and that's about it, tie the loads to the switch outputs and you're set.

These protected switches aren't at all indestructible, but they can put up with a lot.  They're favorites in automotive designs -- great for driving lamps, LEDs, solenoids, motors, etc.

The datasheet explains how they work.  They don't really limit current, most of them; so, they can heat up pretty damn quickly under fault.  There's a temperature sensor onboard, mere microns away -- the thermal shutdown can act fast enough to keep it from destruction.  So it might be on for 100us, then waits some 10 or 100ms cooling down, then tries again, and so on.  What you see from the outside is a load blipping pitifully as it keeps retrying.  (This is a lot of thermal stress on the part, it probably won't keep doing this forever -- but it is a lot better than just failing instantly!)

Tim
Seven Transistor Labs, LLC
Electronic design, from concept to prototype.
Bringing a project to life?  Send me a message!
 
The following users thanked this post: DW1961

Offline coromonadalix

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7014
  • Country: ca
Re: Protecting a Motherboard RGB fets from shorts and over voltage
« Reply #2 on: July 14, 2020, 07:02:32 am »
On the market you have some rgb led buffer(s) box, they receive the rgb leds commands / input voltage ....   and they provide more current at the output

They are often used with an "remote controlled effects"  controller and are put in parallel  to add many led strips outputs
 

Offline DW1961Topic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 753
  • Country: us
Re: Protecting a Motherboard RGB fets from shorts and over voltage
« Reply #3 on: July 14, 2020, 06:41:35 pm »
In other words, not realistic. :(
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf