Author Topic: Strain gauge Joystick - Could something like this work?  (Read 4100 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline PeterFWTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 577
  • Country: de
    • Stuff that goes boom
Strain gauge Joystick - Could something like this work?
« on: January 22, 2020, 12:39:03 pm »
I would like a 2 axis input device, i have a few wonky design restrictions i set myself, one is no "moving" parts and so i  came up with the attachment as a rough idea. 

The middle hole is just for attaching the stick of the joy-stick part.
The deflection gets measured with the PCB strain gauges, the cutout makes it more conforming.

I have seen designs like this, so it should work, but what do you think?
 

Online amyk

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8622
 
The following users thanked this post: PeterFW

Offline george.b

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 383
  • Country: br
Re: Strain gauge Joystick - Could something like this work?
« Reply #2 on: January 22, 2020, 01:33:27 pm »
Aha, I see you've been studying the IBM Trackpoint ;D

That looks like it could work, yes. There has to be a small deflection for it to work, so maybe it's something to keep in mind when it comes to materials/mechanical layout - how much deflection as a result of how much force, and how sensitive a strain gauge you'd have to use.
 
The following users thanked this post: PeterFW

Offline PeterFWTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 577
  • Country: de
    • Stuff that goes boom
Re: Strain gauge Joystick - Could something like this work?
« Reply #3 on: January 22, 2020, 05:43:37 pm »
The whole device becomes the (slightly) moving part!
More seriously,
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pointing_stick_of_a_Lenovo_ThinkPad_keyboard-4488.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pointing_stick_of_a_Lenovo_ThinkPad_keyboard-1047.jpg

Thanks for the reply! 
You are correct, that is why i put the moving in quotation marks :) 

I have read the patent and a few more resources concerning this design, i was just hoping someone maybe has tried it yet and got some practical knowledge. 
Sadly the Trackpoint devices are, as far as i can make out, based on regular FSR. 
I mean, technically a stain gauge is a FSR too but you know what i mean :)
 

Offline PeterFWTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 577
  • Country: de
    • Stuff that goes boom
Re: Strain gauge Joystick - Could something like this work?
« Reply #4 on: January 22, 2020, 05:52:08 pm »
Thank you for the reply!

That looks like it could work, yes. There has to be a small deflection for it to work, so maybe it's something to keep in mind when it comes to materials/mechanical layout - how much deflection as a result of how much force, and how sensitive a strain gauge you'd have to use.

Yea, while i know how strain gauges work and what you have to do to get data from them, i never worked with them. 
On FR4 they should experience a deflection which these usually do not see. 

Maybe i should just design a couple of different arrangements and try them out but i got a problem with resistance. 
Using Copper on FR4 i do not get anywhere near >1Ohm.
 

Offline fcb

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2135
  • Country: gb
  • Test instrument designer/G1YWC
    • Electron Plus
Re: Strain gauge Joystick - Could something like this work?
« Reply #5 on: January 22, 2020, 06:05:00 pm »
Could work.  You might want to put gauges on both sides of the PCB. Zero calibration will be a challenge which everway you do it if you go for bridge arrangements.
https://electron.plus Power Analysers, VI Signature Testers, Voltage References, Picoammeters, Curve Tracers.
 
The following users thanked this post: PeterFW

Offline Prehistoricman

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 216
  • Country: gb
Re: Strain gauge Joystick - Could something like this work?
« Reply #6 on: January 22, 2020, 06:05:57 pm »
Yea, while i know how strain gauges work and what you have to do to get data from them, i never worked with them. 
On FR4 they should experience a deflection which these usually do not see. 

Maybe i should just design a couple of different arrangements and try them out but i got a problem with resistance. 
Using Copper on FR4 i do not get anywhere near >1Ohm.
Your deflection will be in milliohms anyway so the low total resistance doesn't matter too much.
 
The following users thanked this post: PeterFW

Offline PeterFWTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 577
  • Country: de
    • Stuff that goes boom
Re: Strain gauge Joystick - Could something like this work?
« Reply #7 on: January 22, 2020, 06:20:25 pm »
Your deflection will be in milliohms anyway so the low total resistance doesn't matter too much.
 

But in a wheatstone bridge arrangement, i need to match the resistance of all elements to the resistance of the strain gauge. 
If my gauge is below 1 Ohm, i practically create a short between the supply rails. 

Or do i have this part wrong? 
 

Offline fcb

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2135
  • Country: gb
  • Test instrument designer/G1YWC
    • Electron Plus
Re: Strain gauge Joystick - Could something like this work?
« Reply #8 on: January 22, 2020, 11:58:35 pm »
Yeah. It’s going to be super low impedance. Commercial strain gauges are typically 120/350/1Kohms, very thin metal printed/etched onto polyamide.

Principle is the same though - you’ll just have to be creative with your circuitry to cope with the low Z.
https://electron.plus Power Analysers, VI Signature Testers, Voltage References, Picoammeters, Curve Tracers.
 
The following users thanked this post: PeterFW

Offline skylar

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 10
  • Country: us
Re: Strain gauge Joystick - Could something like this work?
« Reply #9 on: January 23, 2020, 04:04:16 pm »
Yeah. It’s going to be super low impedance. Commercial strain gauges are typically 120/350/1Kohms, very thin metal printed/etched onto polyamide.

Principle is the same though - you’ll just have to be creative with your circuitry to cope with the low Z.

Not to be annoying, but would not it be easier to glue commercial strain gauges to the PCB cutout originally shown? Then you could use the standard circuit to measure it, no moving parts though there is more assembly than the project seems to aim for.
 
The following users thanked this post: PeterFW

Offline richard.cs

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1204
  • Country: gb
  • Electronics engineer from Southampton, UK.
    • Random stuff I've built (mostly non-electronic and fairly dated).
Re: Strain gauge Joystick - Could something like this work?
« Reply #10 on: January 23, 2020, 04:27:46 pm »
I have tried printed strain gauges on PCBs before, they weren't great. In my case I was comparing tracks on one side with others at 90 degrees on the other side of the PCB and my main problem was that the two identical geometries ended up 30% different in resistance giving large offsets. I suspect this was mostly plating rather than etching. On mine the major killer was the resistance delta meant that the self-heating didn't cancel so it wasn't as simple as removing a fixed offset.

Your sketch suggests you're comparing two areas on the same side of the board which should be bent in opposing directions, they will probably be better matched than mine. You may still find the low impedance problematic though.
 
The following users thanked this post: PeterFW

Offline fcb

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2135
  • Country: gb
  • Test instrument designer/G1YWC
    • Electron Plus
Re: Strain gauge Joystick - Could something like this work?
« Reply #11 on: January 23, 2020, 07:16:45 pm »
Yeah. It’s going to be super low impedance. Commercial strain gauges are typically 120/350/1Kohms, very thin metal printed/etched onto polyamide.

Principle is the same though - you’ll just have to be creative with your circuitry to cope with the low Z.

Not to be annoying, but would not it be easier to glue commercial strain gauges to the PCB cutout originally shown? Then you could use the standard circuit to measure it, no moving parts though there is more assembly than the project seems to aim for.
Sure - but then you have a $20 thing, I think the OP wants to make a low cost thing.  Also, a standard strain gauge setup might still need an instrumentation amp with a gain of 100-1000, ADC etc..

Handling the low-Z is the first headache, compensating for thermal drift will be a big deal also.  But then thats 90% of the fun with electronics.
https://electron.plus Power Analysers, VI Signature Testers, Voltage References, Picoammeters, Curve Tracers.
 
The following users thanked this post: PeterFW

Offline Leo Bodnar

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 831
  • Country: gb
Re: Strain gauge Joystick - Could something like this work?
« Reply #12 on: January 24, 2020, 07:03:21 pm »
Typical strain gauge has 1-2microstrains limit before deformation becomes plastic and irreversible.
Have you done stress-strain analysis on it?
Self-heating is usually prevented by gating the excitation voltage.
Leo
« Last Edit: January 27, 2020, 11:34:28 pm by Leo Bodnar »
 
The following users thanked this post: PeterFW

Offline PeterFWTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 577
  • Country: de
    • Stuff that goes boom
Re: Strain gauge Joystick - Could something like this work?
« Reply #13 on: January 27, 2020, 11:29:33 pm »
Thank you everybody for your ideas and feedback, i want it to be a cheap solution because i would like at least... 44 or 88 of them. 

But after a lot more thinking an research i ended up with a FSR matrix from Sensitronics, at least i ordered one. 
I think i can get the desired effect if i glue on suitable rubber feet with considerations of the matrix pitch. 

That should get me where i want.
 

Offline jfitter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 11
  • Country: au
Re: Strain gauge Joystick - Could something like this work?
« Reply #14 on: January 31, 2020, 07:34:41 am »
Electrically the design is simple whether you use strain gauges, optical rotation sensors, etc. What really needs to be considered is whether the mechanical design is practical.

Real joysticks used for machine control have a mechanical arrangement that provides for a centering force. What this means is that a certain critical force (torque) must be exerted before there is any output from the sensor, after which the output is linear with deflection. Check out radio control joysticks, especially the high end ones, aircraft side-sticks, joysticks for cranes and hoists, coal mining machines, etc.

The problem with simple force sensors on fixed sticks is that there is an output for any force. A tiny force yields a tiny output and the practical reality of this is that it is almost impossible to control anything with it.

This is why non-gymbal joysticks are NOT used for machine control.

 
 

Offline Leo Bodnar

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 831
  • Country: gb
Re: Strain gauge Joystick - Could something like this work?
« Reply #15 on: January 31, 2020, 08:51:31 am »
I would not say anything. A lot of critical control systems use force sensitive control as opposed to displacement sensitive controls.
E.g. most modern fighter planes.
Humans control forces much better than position.
Leo
... it is almost impossible to control anything with it.
This is why non-gymbal joysticks are NOT used for machine control.
« Last Edit: January 31, 2020, 08:56:27 am by Leo Bodnar »
 
The following users thanked this post: Kilrah

Offline MarkF

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2839
  • Country: us
Re: Strain gauge Joystick - Could something like this work?
« Reply #16 on: January 31, 2020, 02:36:13 pm »
I would not say anything. A lot of critical control systems use force sensitive control as opposed to displacement sensitive controls.
E.g. most modern fighter planes.
Humans control forces much better than position.
Leo
... it is almost impossible to control anything with it.
This is why non-gymbal joysticks are NOT used for machine control.

Correct.
The force sensitive stick in the fighter moves less than +/- 1/4" at the top of a 12" long stick.
It works surprisingly well.  Very easy to control.
 

Offline jfitter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 11
  • Country: au
Re: Strain gauge Joystick - Could something like this work?
« Reply #17 on: February 01, 2020, 09:27:14 am »
I would not say anything. A lot of critical control systems use force sensitive control as opposed to displacement sensitive controls.
E.g. most modern fighter planes.
Humans control forces much better than position.
Leo
... it is almost impossible to control anything with it.
This is why non-gymbal joysticks are NOT used for machine control.

Correct.
The force sensitive stick in the fighter moves less than +/- 1/4" at the top of a 12" long stick.
It works surprisingly well.  Very easy to control.

This is by your definition a displacement sensitive stick.
In a fighter the stick must be controlled when under a G loading of up to 9G. Elastomer sticks are the only practical solution.

The MOST precise joystick operators are high level radio control aerobatic competitors. They require a level of precision which is almost super human. The top radios have precision machined gymbals floating on ceramic bearings with 16 bit hall effect angle sensors on each axis. Force sticks have been tried and found unsuitable.

As a past national champ I believe I am well qualified to speak on this matter. You need to actually get out there and do it to understand the practical issues involved - it's called engineering.
 

Offline Leo Bodnar

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 831
  • Country: gb
Re: Strain gauge Joystick - Could something like this work?
« Reply #18 on: February 01, 2020, 10:53:58 am »
The MOST precise joystick operators are high level radio control aerobatic competitors...
As a past national champ I believe I am well qualified...
I am chuffed to learn from the best - thank you for this lesson.  :)
Leo

Offline Kilrah

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 1852
  • Country: ch
Re: Strain gauge Joystick - Could something like this work?
« Reply #19 on: February 01, 2020, 02:06:12 pm »
The problem with simple force sensors on fixed sticks is that there is an output for any force.
That's why you use the difference as your input, proper thresholds etc. I did play with FSR-based sticks in the past and had good results for the intended purpose.

The top radios have precision machined gymbals floating on ceramic bearings with 16 bit hall effect angle sensors on each axis
Nothing in the OP says he requires such precision though. And having a foot in that field, a lot of what you just touted is just clever marketing :)
 

Offline jfitter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 11
  • Country: au
Re: Strain gauge Joystick - Could something like this work?
« Reply #20 on: February 01, 2020, 11:50:45 pm »
The problem with simple force sensors on fixed sticks is that there is an output for any force.
That's why you use the difference as your input, proper thresholds etc. I did play with FSR-based sticks in the past and had good results for the intended purpose.

The top radios have precision machined gymbals floating on ceramic bearings with 16 bit hall effect angle sensors on each axis
Nothing in the OP says he requires such precision though. And having a foot in that field, a lot of what you just touted is just clever marketing :)
Garbage - do you actually have one of these. I do. Open it up and have a real look. As an embedded design engineer for 30 years I do know what I am looking at.

The problem with these forums is the answers from people who clearly have no idea what they are talking about. I reply to almost nothing, and only when I see a question that I have experience in and know a great deal about do I answer and offer advice. It is usually met with responses from the peanut gallery, which is why I don't reply very often.

You lot are on your own. Figure it out yourselves.


 

Offline MarkF

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2839
  • Country: us
Re: Strain gauge Joystick - Could something like this work?
« Reply #21 on: February 02, 2020, 07:19:31 am »
The problem with simple force sensors on fixed sticks is that there is an output for any force.
That's why you use the difference as your input, proper thresholds etc. I did play with FSR-based sticks in the past and had good results for the intended purpose.

The top radios have precision machined gymbals floating on ceramic bearings with 16 bit hall effect angle sensors on each axis
Nothing in the OP says he requires such precision though. And having a foot in that field, a lot of what you just touted is just clever marketing :)
Garbage - do you actually have one of these. I do. Open it up and have a real look. As an embedded design engineer for 30 years I do know what I am looking at.

The problem with these forums is the answers from people who clearly have no idea what they are talking about. I reply to almost nothing, and only when I see a question that I have experience in and know a great deal about do I answer and offer advice. It is usually met with responses from the peanut gallery, which is why I don't reply very often.

You lot are on your own. Figure it out yourselves.

Are you all talking about RC Model airplanes or actual aircraft?
I was referring to the actual aircraft and we just used the un-certified ground version.
Still far too expensive to take apart ($16,000).  I don't know the internal mechanism.  Just that they are force sensitive.
« Last Edit: February 02, 2020, 07:24:50 am by MarkF »
 

Offline i_am_fubar

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 53
  • Country: gb
Re: Strain gauge Joystick - Could something like this work?
« Reply #22 on: February 02, 2020, 10:57:23 am »
I question the need for 16 bit hall effect. Assuming 50mm of tip travel, that means your controlling down to 800nm of positional accuracy. That is..... Not going to happen. 50um (10 bit), can't believe you would notice a difference?
 

Offline Kilrah

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 1852
  • Country: ch
Re: Strain gauge Joystick - Could something like this work?
« Reply #23 on: February 02, 2020, 07:53:37 pm »
Garbage - do you actually have one of these. I do. Open it up and have a real look. As an embedded design engineer for 30 years I do know what I am looking at.
I never said it's not what was inside, only that it's a marketing gimmick rather than something actually significantly beneficial. I've seen a few fun blind tests.

 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf