Author Topic: DUT vs EUT?  (Read 4652 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Pack34Topic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 753
DUT vs EUT?
« on: October 20, 2020, 01:50:25 pm »
From what I've seen, Device Under Test and Equipment Under Test seem to be interchangeable terms. Is this true? always true? and is there a situation where one is more appropriate than the other?
 

Online T3sl4co1l

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 22433
  • Country: us
  • Expert, Analog Electronics, PCB Layout, EMC
    • Seven Transistor Labs
Re: DUT vs EUT?
« Reply #1 on: October 20, 2020, 02:45:52 pm »
Yes, more or less.  I think of devices like individual components, whereas equipment is made from many devices.  It's kind of... being specific as a courtesy, I'd say.

I don't think there are many places where both terms are in use, and distinct?  For example, EMC regs are only concerned about EUT, and component testing is only concerned about DUTs.  Either one could use "DUT" alone, given a suitable definition elsewhere.

Tim
Seven Transistor Labs, LLC
Electronic design, from concept to prototype.
Bringing a project to life?  Send me a message!
 

Offline Siwastaja

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8789
  • Country: fi
Re: DUT vs EUT?
« Reply #2 on: October 20, 2020, 02:54:45 pm »
Such abbreviations are meaningless and only confusing if you expect the reader to understand them automagically.

It's not a name, like "USB", so you are using it just to save keystrokes and pages, in the original sense of using an abbreviation.

You choose whichever, and do not forget to define it the first time you use it, and if you are writing a long piece of documentation, better to remind the reader about such terms every now and then - for example write the full phrase each time the term is used for the first time in each new chapter.

Adding a section listing all abbreviations used is typical and recommendable.

The question to be asked is, are you calling the thing to be tested "device" or "equipment"?
« Last Edit: October 20, 2020, 02:57:35 pm by Siwastaja »
 

Offline BravoV

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7549
  • Country: 00
  • +++ ATH1
Re: DUT vs EUT?
« Reply #3 on: October 20, 2020, 03:00:07 pm »
The question to be asked is, are you calling the thing to be tested "device" or "equipment"?

+1 , and its just weird if a single transistor under measurement is called "equipment".  ::)

Offline LaryPant

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 32
  • Country: dk
Re: DUT vs EUT?
« Reply #4 on: October 20, 2020, 04:10:33 pm »
Just to throw in a little curveball: There is also UUT - Unit Under Test.

Although UUT seems to be completely interchangeable with DUT, where as the abbreviation/term EUT would not be used for things like a piece of software, HDL module or components as was mentioned previously.

Lary

 

Offline spudboy488

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 136
Re: DUT vs EUT?
« Reply #5 on: October 21, 2020, 12:20:49 pm »
Call it whatever you want as long as you describe/define what the acronym is in the test procedure.

I design test equipment for a living. I've put together systems that test small PCBs all the way up to cellular base stations. I've always used UUT and included "UUT: Unit Under Test" in the definitions section of the test procedure.
 

Offline greenpossum

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 408
  • Country: au
Re: DUT vs EUT?
« Reply #6 on: October 21, 2020, 12:44:51 pm »
Just call it a WUT. Expands to WUT Under Test.  :-DD
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf