Would be worth having a look at the capacitance too.
Gyro mentions leakage as it may have increased the oxide layer thickness by being re-formed at 45V. Would be interesting to see if that has changed the capacitance too (easier to measure than leakage, which would hopefully be in the low nano-amps range or less, though using a DMM in a mV range as a 10M current shunt is an option).
You're probably fine though. I did something worse the other day - connected up a 5600uF 450V cap (worth far more than $15 new, though I got it free) the wrong way around at 10V bias or so, though thankfully with only a 10mA current limit. Turns out the stripe on the label is for the POSTIVE terminal, opposite to ~every other electrolytic

. When I fixed the error it still measured fine though (capacitance just over 10% down from nominal, i.e. still within spec, and it was potentially already well-used), with leakage fine up to 400V (max I can easily test until I upgrade my Keithley 236 SMU to a 237).