Electronics > Projects, Designs, and Technical Stuff
Why NMOS for buck switchers? (other than generally better NMOS specs)
741:
Just reading up on switchers... Assuming a basic circuit, with a catch-diode and a pass transistor: The buck circuit examples I have seen all use an NMOS with drain @Vdd, and Source tied to the inductor, hence a possible difficulty driving the NMOS gate fully ON for smaller Vin-Vout.
I wondered - if I invert the sense of the drive signal, can I use a PMOS, with Source at Vin+, drain tied to inductor? Ominously, I cannot find any examples :-\, must be a catch...maybe to do with impedance of D Vs S?
(In my case I'd like a high current, but pretty low voltage difference (say 3v), between Vin and Vout, hence (for the NMOS solution) I'd need to find an NMOS with low Vto)
Kleinstein:
One could use a P_MOSFET, but as already written, PMOS performance is not as good.
One a chip it is often cheaper to use NMOS and bootstrapped gate drive. It usually requites 1-2 external caps. This also gives better performance.
741:
Many thanks for your explanation - my mind is "easier" now.
It seems to work OK in LTSpice.
T3sl4co1l:
They're out there:
https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/tps40200-q1.pdf
Performance is king. The difference is not small -- PMOS is about 2.5x worse than NMOS. More die area = bigger package and more cost (with knock-on costs from lower production quantities -- i.e., PMOS in general are less common, and cost more as a result). Poorer Qg*Rds(on) figure of merit = generally higher switching losses, and either higher conduction losses or higher drive losses (drive power is Qg * Vgs(on) * Fsw).
You need a driver anyway -- the gate has generous capacitance in either type, so a mere logic-level output is unsuitable for all but the smallest transistors -- and it's not much added die area (if integrated) or cost (if discrete*) to include the bootstrap driver for NMOS. So it's very practical to use NMOS in high or low side application. :-+
* "RTL" level discrete that is, i.e., using ICs for basic functions. Low side, logic-input drivers are cheap and plentiful (TC4427, etc.), as are bootstrap drivers (IR2110, etc.). If you're doing something truly discrete (bare transistors), it's harder -- a high-voltage, noise-immune level shifter is certainly doable, but it will take more transistors than the alternative (compare this (first page, top and left half) to this, for example).
Tim
741:
Hi Tim
"Gate_Driver.png" reminded me of something I saw in a textbook ("circuits for electronic instrumentation", T H O'Dell, p103).
For added drive on fast edges, the top-left transistor had an emitter decoupling capacitor, also both bases of left-side transistors were tied via a capacitor.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version