Author Topic: Winding a ribbon mic transformer  (Read 1856 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ELS122Topic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 936
  • Country: 00
Winding a ribbon mic transformer
« on: September 24, 2022, 02:12:52 pm »
Do I need to wind the secondary on the inside, and primary on the outside, like most ribbon mic transformers that I've seen are wound?
Is there any benefit to layer the windings like is done in some hifi tube output transformers? (having the primary windings both on the inside and outside sandwiching the secondary)
Does around 30 turns for the primary and 1000 turns for the secondary sound ok for a standard balanced output?
Do I need a center tap to make it balanced? wouldn't it balance by itself if I just don't connect anything (or rather just connect the case for shielding) to the ground pin of the balanced connector? and if I do need to wind a center tap, is it super critical to get it exact? I know how a balanced input works but I just don't have much experience with how much impact on noise is an imbalance in the signals.
 

Offline Kleinstein

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 14753
  • Country: de
Re: Winding a ribbon mic transformer
« Reply #1 on: September 24, 2022, 03:20:55 pm »
Having the primary on the outside is not really needed. It may help to have the larger bending radius for the thicker wire though and less of the thinner wire. The difference which winding is inside is not that important. I would even prefer the primary inside, as winding normally drives the magnetization of the core. Having the primary (or secondary split increase the couling). HIgher parasitic capacitance should not be a problem here.

How many turns are needed really depends on the core size, source impedance and resistance for the wires (including the part between mic and transformer). The larger the transformer the fewer turns are needed. 30 Ohms primary look like a lot as it would likely be way more resistance than the source.  A ratio of some 1:30 seem resonable, though maybe a bit on the high side as the impedance transforms like the ration squared. The point is to keep the magnetization well away from saturation and the inductance well higher than the nominal signal impedance.

Wether one needs to center tap depends on the way the input circuit is made. Some get away without and some need it. The symmetry should no be that imortant - it again depends on the counter part side.
 
The following users thanked this post: ELS122

Offline ELS122Topic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 936
  • Country: 00
Re: Winding a ribbon mic transformer
« Reply #2 on: September 24, 2022, 04:16:40 pm »
Having the primary on the outside is not really needed. It may help to have the larger bending radius for the thicker wire though and less of the thinner wire. The difference which winding is inside is not that important. I would even prefer the primary inside, as winding normally drives the magnetization of the core. Having the primary (or secondary split increase the couling). HIgher parasitic capacitance should not be a problem here.

How many turns are needed really depends on the core size, source impedance and resistance for the wires (including the part between mic and transformer). The larger the transformer the fewer turns are needed. 30 Ohms primary look like a lot as it would likely be way more resistance than the source.  A ratio of some 1:30 seem resonable, though maybe a bit on the high side as the impedance transforms like the ration squared. The point is to keep the magnetization well away from saturation and the inductance well higher than the nominal signal impedance.

Wether one needs to center tap depends on the way the input circuit is made. Some get away without and some need it. The symmetry should no be that imortant - it again depends on the counter part side.
well the core size is tiny, source impedance idk, it's like a .02mm strip of aluminum foil, like 5mm wide, I'm thinking of using .1mm (36AWG) wire for the secondary, and whatever I can fit on the primary.
I already tried winding with .18mm (33AWG) and I couldn't even fit 1000 turns of that on the bobbin, let alone having space for the primary.
(yes I should probably find a bigger core and bobbin, but I think for a first attempt it would be fine)
well I'll just hope it doesn't have problems with early saturation, or maybe that will make it sound that much better who knows  ;D

all the mic preamps I've seen don't have a center tapped input transformer, they just connect the ground pin of the balanced input to ground, and the 2 balanced signal wires to the input transformer.
but I have no problem putting a center tap in so I'll do that anyway!
« Last Edit: September 24, 2022, 04:18:20 pm by ELS122 »
 

Offline Kleinstein

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 14753
  • Country: de
Re: Winding a ribbon mic transformer
« Reply #3 on: September 24, 2022, 04:54:22 pm »
One can calculate the required magnetization from the core coss-section area and voltage per turn. The maximum usefull core magnetization depends on the materail (e.g. some 400 mT for permalloy or cobalt based amphous, some 600 mT for iron or iron based amorphous and maybe a little more for nonoperm. Ferrite would be good for maybe 200 mT, but would need to be right type with high mu.

Another hint for the number of turns is the inductance of the core. The secondary inductance (no primary connected) should give an impedance well higher than the usual 600 ohms typical for a banced mic at reasonable low frequencies (e.g. 20 Hz). So one can also calculate a minimum mumber of turns from this side. Getting to low in the inductance would get nonlinearity from the core magnetization.

The use of a bobin suggests that the core is a 2 part construction. In this case it really helps to get good contact to avoid any extra air gap.
 
The following users thanked this post: ELS122

Online Conrad Hoffman

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1994
  • Country: us
    • The Messy Basement
Re: Winding a ribbon mic transformer
« Reply #4 on: September 24, 2022, 06:39:55 pm »
If you aren't already there, be sure to check out the micbuilders on groups.io- https://groups.io/g/MicBuilders/messages
 
The following users thanked this post: David Aurora, ELS122

Offline ELS122Topic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 936
  • Country: 00
Re: Winding a ribbon mic transformer
« Reply #5 on: September 24, 2022, 06:55:06 pm »
well I finished it, here are some pictures:
https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/922916198956544070/1023304717293604954/image0.jpg?width=329&height=439
https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/922916198956544070/1023304718006616084/image1.jpg?width=329&height=439
https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/922916198956544070/1023304718627381298/image2.jpg?width=585&height=439

after winding it I now have many reconsiderations, for example the transformer bobbin and core I used was trash, brittle crappy plastic bobbin and theres so few plates that make up the whole thing.
I should've not terminated the primary windings, would've been better to just use them as the hookup wires for less wire resistance leading to losses.
and probably should've used less turns and thicker wire, would be less lossy and I probably dont need the low end response anyway.

but that's just speculation, I've yet to build the ribbon part of the mic.

messured the DC resistance of the windings, the primary is around 0.2ohms, the secondary is around 70ohm (end to end)
so it probably wouldn't be ideal to drive a 300 ohm input, with like 45% insertion loss
« Last Edit: September 25, 2022, 05:49:52 am by ELS122 »
 

Offline NBryanBlack

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 1
  • Country: us
Re: Winding a ribbon mic transformer
« Reply #6 on: June 27, 2023, 08:15:23 pm »
Your transformer does not need a center tap to be balanced.  If this winding is to be connected to a normal mic circuit via XLR, I would recommend against putting in a center tap, or, if you do, do not ground it via pin 1!  This would put 48 volts through your transformer winding if phantom power was turned on, even by accident.  Not worth the risk in my opinion. 

 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf