Author Topic: Anybody ever use a TSDSON-8 package?  (Read 3572 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline AcHmed99Topic starter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 35
  • Country: 00
Anybody ever use a TSDSON-8 package?
« on: October 27, 2011, 10:33:11 pm »
I'm
« Last Edit: November 28, 2016, 07:03:33 pm by AcHmed99 »
 

Offline amspire

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3802
  • Country: au
Re: Anybody ever use a TSDSON-8 package?
« Reply #1 on: October 27, 2011, 11:32:59 pm »
The 60C/W is with the 6cm2 copper on the drain on a 40mm x 40mm board.

I didn't see any Junction to Ambient for the device on its own.

It looks like the devices themselves are amazing - if you can cool the case down to 25 C, they can dissipate 60W!

So for 300mW, you will probably need 2 - 3 cm2 of copper on the drain, as long as the device is not right next to other hot parts.

Richard
 

Offline mikeselectricstuff

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 13987
  • Country: gb
    • Mike's Electric Stuff
Re: Anybody ever use a TSDSON-8 package?
« Reply #2 on: October 27, 2011, 11:49:49 pm »
The 60C/W is with the 6cm2 copper on the drain on a 40mm x 40mm board.

I didn't see any Junction to Ambient for the device on its own.

It looks like the devices themselves are amazing - if you can cool the case down to 25 C, they can dissipate 60W!

Which you will of course never manage, except for very short periods.
Quote
So for 300mW, you will probably need 2 - 3 cm2 of copper on the drain, as long as the device is not right next to other hot parts.

Richard
Sounds about right.
There isn't typically much difference in thermal resistance between devices in similar package sizes, so if you can find data on something similar that is better speccecd it won't be to far off. 
Youtube channel:Taking wierd stuff apart. Very apart.
Mike's Electric Stuff: High voltage, vintage electronics etc.
Day Job: Mostly LEDs
 

Offline amspire

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3802
  • Country: au
Re: Anybody ever use a TSDSON-8 package?
« Reply #3 on: October 28, 2011, 12:36:50 am »
I see it now. That 62C/W is a very odd spec. If it were true, then the 6cm2 of copper is almost totally useless - which I do not believe. It does look like a typo.

You really do not need much to get rid of 300mw. If you had as little as 1cm2 of copper near the device, it would probably be fine, as the copper is not just radiating the heat, but is is also dumping the heat into the bulk of the PCB. I am pretty confident that 2 cm2 would be very safe.

Richard
« Last Edit: October 28, 2011, 01:25:12 am by amspire »
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf