You can also get a 350Mhz 12 bit scope for 3400€ (SDS2354X HD), I can't imagine that you would launch your own scope at twice the price without being sure that it can compete with it.
And that a larger screen alone is not enough.
(emphasis mine)
I think that pretty much nails it.
Whatever. A new player in the scope market certainly is welcome news to many (incl. myself).
I'm glad to see this thread active again and I probably (and unfortunately)
did derail it somewhat but I had no ill intentions whatsoever. In fact, while feeling innocent (in terms of intentions) I recognize that my merely telling what I think and after that simply responding to others seems to have had a negative effect. And for that I sincerely apologize. I certainly wish no harm whatsoever to Batronix.
Even more ironically: although their first video is very critical of the RTM's roll mode implementation, it didn't stop Afug from using the RTM (in roll mode!!!) when explaining PWM in a different video
Talking about Afug I went to youtube and watched a relatively recent video about a Benning current clamp.
And lo and behold! - what did I see there? A Micsig scope!
As you seem to be keen to interpret her/them using this or that scope for this or that purpose, let's look at what that newer video tells us. Maybe, shock and awe, it means that the RTM was, matching the findings of their review/test video series, found to be unsatisfactory and replaced by a Micsig scope?
In other words: I get it, you work at and for R&S, and not surprisingly tend to defend them. That's OK and normal.
BUT:
Never ever smear or belittle a benevolent reviewer (not payed, serving "the community")!
Maybe politely hint at a (e.g. procedural) error such a reviewer might make, that's OK, nobody expects a company to hold still when someone erroneously "puts them in a bad light". But do not do what you did - such "irony" is bound to turn against you in the long run.
Friendly regards