trobbins wrote:
Did you measure the 1V drop (ie. 16V to 15V) for a single successful crank start of your Astro van engine?
I acquired and initially tested these supercaps several years ago, and I don't have that diary handy.
As I recall, I used a single 80F string equalized to the vehicle battery at rest (ie 12.5-ish V).
I usually got 2 successful starts bofore falling to 11V.
I could successfully start at 10V (just once before recharging back to battery voltage).
It was awesome to observe very little voltage sag during cranking.
I was convinced that 2 or 3 strings in parallel would be satisfactory for my vehicle.
The self-discharge will be max when the cap is sitting at 16V.
I suspect the caps have increased internal resistance since they were new.
As well, I might have heat-damaged one string while attempting to solder balance leads to the intermediate tabs.
The middle cell has increased leakage; it makes a good test case for the balance circuit.
I'll be doing renewed testing when I'm done with the balance circuit.
Btw these are series of 5 x 400F@3V cells = 80F@15V bank (Amperics Inc);
The datasheet for the discrete cells specified 3.1V absolute max while the datasheet for the 5X module specified 14V max; guess they left a little breathing space for cell imbalance.
These modules are rated a tad too low for alternator charging... but the price was right and they were adequate to get me going on a proof-of-concept.
Your first post indicates the supercap is in parallel with the battery. But you refer to the ESM product (but a reduced capacity version). Can you confirm the battery is effectively in parallel with the supercap B+ or charge terminal, and the starter motor circuit is across just the supercap cap output (ie. will vary from circa 16V down to whatever the starter motor will discharge it to if it were to keep cranking).
The Maxwell ESM is a 3-terminal device with B(attery), S(tarter) and G(round) terminals. The internal supercap bank and starter are isolated from the battery by (presumably) a boost charging circuit and backflow block, while the starter is hard-wired to the supercap bank. See 'Supercap Starter'/'Smart Start' (Fig 2) in
https://www.eenewspower.com/content/extending-battery-life-transportation-and-mobile-applications-supercapacitors.
The 'ESM' in my topology is a 2-terminal device without supercap+starter isolation. It corresponds to the 'Direct Parallel" supercap installation method in the above article (Fig 1). That is simply the battery and supercap bank in parallel hardwired to the starter. As such, there is no boost charger to bring its voltage up to 16V, nor does it retain the full 14.4(+/-)V from the alternator. When the vehicle is parked the supercap bank voltage will track the battery's voltage as it settles to 12.5V at rest.
I made the comparison to the commercial product without intending this level of detail. I likened the two based on the broader concept of using supercaps to start a vehicle. Perhaps I overreached by referring to my supercap bank as an 'ESM'.