Wind turbines have a problem when there is no demand for their output. They can be feathered and shut down, but I understand there are consequences for that. There are situations where its better for them to pay to keep their turbines somewhat loaded, if nobody wants the energy. There are no similar issues with solar. If nobody wants it, just just don't output it. Why would anyone pay a cent for the privilege of supplying useless solar power? Is that the whole purpose of negative solar tariffs? So that people ensure their output truly goes to zero when there is no market for it?