Author Topic: Tektronix 466 oscilloscope HF response  (Read 11538 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline David Hess

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 16618
  • Country: us
  • DavidH
Re: Tektronix 466 oscilloscope HF response
« Reply #25 on: May 13, 2017, 08:56:46 am »
I asked about the input resistance; so the oscilloscope inputs are completely normal and not damaged.

I have never even heard of a probe modified like that before.
 

Offline lyonskTopic starter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 21
  • Country: sk
Re: Tektronix 466 oscilloscope HF response
« Reply #26 on: May 13, 2017, 05:20:14 pm »
This is something that I was unaware of and does not seem to be factored into the Tek diagram of the probe,

Why do you think the pdf is titled "The Secret World Of Probes".  :)
There's lots of links to probes stuff in tggzzz's sig. above.

If we make it bigger the voltage should go up so I tend to agree with StillTrying - it should get worse.

I'm glad somebody does!

Before you condem or dismantle the probes, get yourself a 1M resistor, connect directly between the 1kHz and the BNC input's center, and measure the 0% to 63% risetime of the edge to check the scope is ~20pF.

I'll post my attempt when I find it. - Found one.

I adjust the Y amplitude so that the height of the wave covers exactly 6 divisions and I can then judge the 63% amplitude position from the 4th up 66% grid line.

8.6us / 0.5M = 17.2pF which is close enough to the 17-18pF specs. for me!
You can also 'measure' the capacitance of probes this way.


I tried this approach and result is 12ns -> 12ns/0.5M = 24pf. That should be fine considering that I don't have anything to check the time base calibration with.

Now to get my paws on sime nice function gen...

Thank you guys for all your help.
 

Offline StillTrying

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2850
  • Country: se
  • Country: Broken Britain
Re: Tektronix 466 oscilloscope HF response
« Reply #27 on: May 13, 2017, 10:33:20 pm »
12ns/0.5M = 24pf

us  24pF is in the right ballpark!

I can't think what device would have had 1M+~80pF of input impedance either.

This thread has provided me with an interesting insight into probes!

Did you see my attempts to make a DIY X1 High BW Passive Scope Probe, it's a "work in (slow)progress". :)
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/beginners/diy-x1-high-bw-passive-scope-probe/

.  That took much longer than I thought it would.
 

Offline David Hess

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 16618
  • Country: us
  • DavidH
Re: Tektronix 466 oscilloscope HF response
« Reply #28 on: May 14, 2017, 03:07:26 am »
I can't think what device would have had 1M+~80pF of input impedance either.

A really good voltmeter input could have that low of an input capacitance.  The highest capacitance 1 megohm instrument inputs I have seen are 47pF and operate up to 1 MHz although they could be faster.

Maybe we are thinking about this the wrong way.  What if the probe was intended for a different input resistance yielding a different attenuation factor?
 

Offline StillTrying

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2850
  • Country: se
  • Country: Broken Britain
Re: Tektronix 466 oscilloscope HF response
« Reply #29 on: May 14, 2017, 11:52:19 pm »
Maybe we are thinking about this the wrong way.  What if the probe was intended for a different input resistance yielding a different attenuation factor?

I think the LF and HF would be matched on a 3M/20pF scope giving a X3 probe.
Maybe all the extra HF capacitance was to be used on a very long probe cable of 10m 35ft, someone thought that was just a misprint and put the probes and boxes on a 1.2m 3.5ft cable!
After much googleing the purpose of the mod is still a mystery.
.  That took much longer than I thought it would.
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf